Playing God with the Earth's Population

In my post on October 29, called “The Road to Global Governance”, I wrote about Agenda 21 and listed some of the principles they present in the agenda.  Here is what I wrote about Principle #8:

“Principle 8 – To achieve sustainable development and a higher quality of life for all people, States (countries) should reduce and eliminate unsustainable patterns of production and consumption and promote appropriate demographic policies.

(Demographic – vital or social statistics of a human population, as the number of births or deaths).

In the book “Stumbling toward Sustainability” on page 99 it talks about that phrase “promote appropriate demographic policies” and says:  “One might wonder why the United States should care about population growth.  After all, the population ‘problem’ has traditionally been described solely as an issue for developing countries, particularly for countries with over a billion inhabitants such as China or India or wracked by poverty such as Bangladesh.  As this Chapter explains, population growth should be of major concern to Americans for reasons both global and local.  Population size and growth are a root cause of a wide range of pressing environmental problems, from climate change and ozone depletion at the global level to local concerns such as air and water pollution, traffic congestion, sprawl, and loss of local environmental amenities”.

At the United Nations, there is a Department of Economic and Social Issues.  Within this department is a division called the Population Division.  (http://www.un.org/esa/population/unpop.htm).  Another way to access their website is through http://www.unpopulation.org/.  I know ‘un’ here probably means United Nations, but when you consider that they want to reduce the population of the earth, maybe ‘unpopulation’ is more appropriate.

In this division of the United Nations, they provide support for intergovernmental bodies within the United Nations and all countries of the world.  They support the implementation of the recommendations in the Programme of Action adopted by the International Conference on Population and Development.  This conference was held on September 5 – 13, 1994.  Delegates from various governments (including then President Clinton), UN agencies, non-governmental organizations and the media met to discuss issues regarding population such as birth control, family planning, immigration and infant mortality.

At the Population Division website you can bring up data reports regarding world mortality, population, migration, fertility, and contraceptive use.  Under publications, there is an alphabetical list with numerous reports.  Some that caught my eye were, “Abortion Policies: A Global Review”, “Fertility, Contraception and Population Policies”, and “Completing the Fertility Transition”

One of the things I do on a daily basis is subscribe to the newsletters, reports, and daily emails of the Council on Foreign Relations (keep your friends close and your enemies closer).  One of the articles in its latest newsletters is entitled, “The New Population Bomb”.  I learned about The Population Division at the United Nations through this article.

The article points out that according to the U.N. Population Division, global population growth will nearly halt by 2050 and that the world population will have stabilized at 9.15 billion people.  It is currently 6.83 billion.

When you play God with the human population you have undesired consequences and with these consequences (which constitutes a ‘crisis’), you have powers urging a global government to take care of the crisis.  Here is what the article pointed out about the consequence of population control:

4 historic shifts will fundamentally alter the world’s population over the next four decades:

1. The relative demographic weight of the world’s developed countries will drop by nearly 25 %, shifting economic power to the developing nations.  Because the developed countries have been using contraceptives and abortion to reduce their population growth, a larger percentage of the population will over time be concentrated in developing nations.
2. The developed countries’ work forces will substantially age and decline, constraining economic growth in the developed world and raising the demand for immigrant workers.  As your population growth declines due to lower birth rates, your average population becomes older.
3. Most of the world’s expected population growth will increasingly be concentrated in today’s poorest, youngest, and most heavily Muslim countries, which have a dangerous lack of quality education, capital and employment opportunities.  This will cause them to migrant to developed countries for jobs and opportunities.
4. For the first time in history, most of the world’s population will become urbanized, with the largest urban centers being in the world’s poorest countries, where policing, sanitation, and health care are often scarce.  With urbanization in developing countries comes the danger of more international terrorism.

The last paragraph in this section of the article says, “Taken together, these trends will pose challenges every bit as alarming as those noted by Paul Ehrlich in his book “The Population Bomb”.  Coping with them will require nothing less than a major reconsideration of the world’s basic global governance structure.”

I hope you see how all of this fits together with the ‘green’ agenda 21.  The powers (whoever they are) are pushing for global government and are using global warming and sustainable development to create crisis in order to usher it in.

As Americans, we need to keep the pressure on Congress and the President to maintain American Independence from foreign control.  The balance of power could shift with the next crisis.

Faithful in Prayer

Watch video:

David Rockefeller Speaks Out About Population Control