I saw this as soon as I got home.

The Mount Vernon Statement

Constitutional Conservatism: A Statement for the 21st Century

We recommit ourselves to the ideas of the American Founding.  Through the Constitution, the Founders created an enduring framework of limited government based on the rule of law. They sought to secure national independence, provide for economic opportunity, establish true religious liberty and maintain a flourishing society of republican self-government.

These principles define us as a country and inspire us as a people. They are responsible for a prosperous, just nation unlike any other in the world. They are our highest achievements, serving not only as powerful beacons to all who strive for freedom and seek self-government, but as warnings to tyrants and despots everywhere.

Each one of these founding ideas is presently under sustained attack. In recent decades, America’s principles have been undermined and redefined in our culture, our universities and our politics. The selfevident truths of 1776 have been supplanted by the notion that no such truths exist. The federal government today ignores the limits of the Constitution, which is increasingly dismissed as obsolete and irrelevant.

Some insist that America must change, cast off the old and put on the new. But where would this lead — forward or backward, up or down? Isn’t this idea of change an empty promise or even a dangerous deception?

The change we urgently need, a change consistent with the American ideal, is not movement away from but toward our founding principles. At this important time, we need a restatement of Constitutional conservatism grounded in the priceless principle of ordered liberty articulated in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

The conservatism of the Declaration asserts self-evident truths based on the laws of nature and nature’s God. It defends life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It traces authority to the consent of the governed. It recognizes man’s self-interest but also his capacity for virtue.

The conservatism of the Constitution limits government’s powers but ensures that government performs its proper job effectively. It refines popular will through the filter of representation. It provides checks and balances through the several branches of government and a federal republic.

A Constitutional conservatism unites all conservatives through the natural fusion provided by American principles. It reminds economic conservatives that morality is essential to limited government, social conservatives that unlimited government is a threat to moral self-government, and national security conservatives that energetic but responsible government is the key to America’s safety and leadership role in the world.

A Constitutional conservatism based on first principles provides the framework for a consistent and meaningful policy agenda.

  • It applies the principle of limited government based on the
    rule of law to every proposal.
  • It honors the central place of individual liberty in American
    politics and life.
  • It encourages free enterprise, the individual entrepreneur, and
    economic reforms grounded in market solutions.
  • It supports America’s national interest in advancing freedom
    and opposing tyranny in the world and prudently considers what we can and should do to that
    end.
  • It informs conservatism’s firm defense of family, neighborhood,
    community, and faith.

If we are to succeed in the critical political and policy battles ahead, we must be certain of our purpose.

We must begin by retaking and resolutely defending the high ground of America’s founding principles.

February 17, 2010

The site for this statement is found at the site The Mount Vernon Statement.  You can go and sign the statement yourself there.

Visit Conservative Hideout RapidFire for all of your Conservative news, opinion, and blogging needs.

Google+LiveJournalTechnorati FavoritesTumblrStumbleUponRedditYahoo BookmarksNewsVineFacebookFriendFeedTwitterShare

Matt

MattI believe that future generations should have the same opportunities that myself, and those that came before me, had. My parents taught me that I could do anything I wanted to do. I don’t want to have to tell my daughter, “You can do whatever the government tells you to do.” We are at a crossroads in this country; are we going to be free, or are we going to be slaves to the nanny state. I choose freedom.
Comments
  • uberVU - social comments February 17, 2010 at 8:01 pm

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by MrEvilMatt: The Mount Vernon Statement http://ff.im/-g73Nh...

  • Ron Russell February 17, 2010 at 8:22 pm

    This Mt Vernon statement appears to be a good idea. Good in that many see a need for such a thing at this time. If things were running smoothly none would have to step forward with this. Its a sign of the times as much as anything else. Many liberties, many principles have fallen by the wayside and need to be restored for the sake of the republic!

    • Matt
      Matt February 18, 2010 at 2:52 am

      Well said Ron.

  • T Christopher February 17, 2010 at 8:59 pm

    I must ask this one question… Do we really need a “statement” to reaffirm our commitment to the Constitution or would we be better served simply stating it plainly. I fail to see how this “statement” does anything more than restate that commitment with situational expediency in that it only reaffirms the portions “important” to token conservatives. I fail to see how these reaffirmations of 80-100 men are truly representative of the conservative voice as a whole or the true intentions of our Founders.. I respect the effort and I do not begrudged them for trying, but I believe it is extremely arrogant to pick and choose which portions of the Constitution we humbly purport to adhere to. How about the whole thing. We support the Constitution. That’s our statement. End of Story…

    • Matt
      Matt February 18, 2010 at 2:50 am

      I’ll restate what I posted at your place: It’s a symbolic act. People are re-affirming and refocusing. Many find this meaningful. I compare it to when people renew their wedding vows. They already know that they’re married, but they do that to reaffirm and refocus. It helps rally and strengthen the troops, so to speak. It won’t be meaningful to everyone, but that’s OK.

      I think folks are reading a bit too much into this.

      Thanks for the comment. It’s good that we can discuss crap without attacks, unlike our adversaries.

      • T Christopher February 18, 2010 at 3:28 am

        I see no need for attacks or even in-fighting. We’re all on the same side. I tell people daily that conservative politics is just like family. We all want to choke one another 364 days a year but every one of us to a man would kill to defend our family from someone outside the familial ranks. I may not love this “statement” but its still far better than anything I’d find anywhere else.

  • Tracy Coyle February 17, 2010 at 9:53 pm

    I find it to be bland at best.

    • Matt
      Matt February 18, 2010 at 2:51 am

      They could have started it out with,” It was a dark and stormy night…” :D

  • Don February 17, 2010 at 9:59 pm

    I liked this part the best…

    “It informs conservatism’s firm defense of family, neighborhood,
    community, and faith.”

    Good find, but it is restating the obvious. However I would take this form of mission statement over ANYTHING from the left on ANY day of the week.

    • Matt
      Matt February 18, 2010 at 2:52 am

      I liked it too, but I think T. Christopher has a better take on that part at his place.

      • T Christopher February 18, 2010 at 3:23 am

        Much appreciated.

      • T Christopher February 18, 2010 at 3:29 am

        Very much appreciated.

      • thatsright February 18, 2010 at 3:55 am

        T usually does.

        My take?

        It’s stupid.

        That’s all my small mind can conjure about this nonsense.

        • Matt
          Matt February 18, 2010 at 4:00 am

          How come? (And I’m not asking about your mind)

          • thatsright February 18, 2010 at 8:56 pm

            I’m just not a fan of “manifestos” and the like that serve only to boost the images of the drafters rather than elevate the ideas. Like T said, we don’t need it. Any new manifesto should be no more than three words:

            Learn the Constitution.

            That’s it. This is a Port Huron Statement for the Tea Party and I for one am not a fan.

  • theCL February 18, 2010 at 10:56 pm

    I feel everyone’s pain … Especially considering it was done by establishment (so-called) conservatives. But …

    Matt’s got it right! Don’t read too much into it. This is America! You don’t have to vote for or support anything you don’t like. Period. There’s no gun to your head telling you you have to go along and get along. The right needs to embrace individualism!

    I agree with T. Christopher too, that we’re all on the same side. We don’t have to agree on everything. The in-fighting (bumper sticker politics among ‘we the people’) is stupid, but I do think healthy debate is in order on the right, if we’re ever going to get anywhere significant.

    Leave the Hive Mind mentality to the Left … where it belongs.

    • Matt
      Matt February 19, 2010 at 12:12 am

      These discussions are good. We didn’t agree, but this wasn’t that big of a thing. I posted it because many people will be encouraged by it. Some folks function symbolically. It will be meaningful for them.

      Getting Conservatives to agree is sometimes like herding cats. We’re not hivemind, as we are individuals. We look at our own thought processes, not the group. We will hash these things out-sometimes it isn’t pretty, but we hopefully learn.

   
© 2011 Conservative Hideout 2.0 Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE