Leftist Professor is Booed for Condemning Arizona Law

Here is a video of a liberal professor being booed for attacking the Arizona Immigration law.

Note that she repeats the tired lie that the law about the law being about racial profiling.  I wonder if she read it, or is she simply lying?  Did you notice that her speech consisted of mostly meaningless liberal double talk?

Here is some more analysis on this event from Campus Reform.

It seems a major disconnect exists between the students at Arizona — as evidenced by the Soto video — and the student senate. The student government voted 9-1 to pass the bill denouncing the Senate Bill 1070, yet students voiced their opposition to Soto’s derision of the bill in a manner not conforming to the view that all University of Arizona students are opposed to the sane law passed by the state.

Nationwide polls show 65-70 percent of American’s favor what Arizona is doing and 70 – 75 percent of Arizona residents polled favor the bill. The student senate at the University of Arizona appears to be run by left-wing zealots who would have joined in standing with the Democrats who clapped for the Mexican President as he lambasted the new Arizona law in Washington DC.

This whole ordeal shows that apathy and indifference to the left on college campuses is the reality, not that students are inherently leftist. When left to their own devices, students would rather enjoy time with friends then engage in politics.

However, when students no longer fear for their grades by conforming to their teachers leftist views, moments like the one Soto found herself confronted with are the norm.

It seems that there are some weaknesses in the indoctrination machine.   I’d say that is some good news.  It also got me thinking of this in terms of the “big picture.”  We know that public education, from government pre-school to government universities, are all set up for indoctrination.  This system is designed so throughout a young person’s life, they will get a steady dose of government sponsored propaganda.  The final product, so to speak, is intended to be an unquestioning, dumbed-down drone, suitable for subservience to a top-down controlled state.

The snag that the “progressives” face is that they haven’t eliminated the free flow of information.  In a state that denies the citizenry the ability to speak and get information for multilple sources, none of the people in that audience would have been able to read the bill.  They wouldn’t know that the POTUS, Janet Napalitano, or the professor here, were lying through their teeth.  They would have no access to information that shows the damage that illegal immigration causes.  They would know nothing more than what the government told them. They would be little more than bleating sheep (mmm, mmm, mmm).

Still wondering why Cass Sunstein and Mark Lloyd were hired?  Their disdain for free speech is openly stated.  If they had their way, the “progressives” would have their utopia; in which AGW was “real,” there would be no death panels (even though granny died awful young), and any information that proved the elites wrong would disappear down the memory hole.