Conservative Hideout 2.0 Rotating Header Image

Great Moments in Civil Discourse: Rosanne Barr Channels the Weather Underground, Calls for "Re-Education Camps" and Beheadings

Share

I know what you’re problably thinking, “who would possibly think what Rosanne Barr says is to be taken seriously?”  On her own, and on the surface, that would be a fair question.  After all, no one takes any of her moonbattery seriously, however, she is repeating a familiar communist meme.  First off, however, lets take a look at what she said.  Here is an excerpt from Steve, over at America’s Watchtower.

In the interest of setting the new tone of civility–and using words that heal and not harm–Roseanne Barr called for beheading of bankers and rich people who she feels make too much money.

“I do say that I am in favor of the return of the guillotine and that is for the worst of the worst of the guilty.

“I first would allow the guilty bankers to pay, you know, the ability to pay back anything over $100 million [of] personal wealth because I believe in a maximum wage of $100 million. And if they are unable to live on that amount of that amount then they should, you know, go to the re-education camps and if that doesn’t help, then being beheaded

I gave Roseanne Barr the benefit of the doubt when I read those words, after all some people think that she is a comedienne, but once I watched the video it was evident that she was serious about this. She condones setting a maximum wage which a person can earn while sending people to re-education camps if they do not agree with her position, and if that doesn’t work: “Off with their heads!”

Again, this is moonbattery typical of Hollywierd types such a Rosanne Barr.  But, a pack of communists had been suggesting things along similar lines.  Here is a video featuring Larry Grathwohl, a FBI informant that infiltrated the Weather Underground.  This is from a CH 2.0 post from June of 2010.

 

 

Pajamas Media  interviewed Grathwohl in October of 2008.

Pajamas Media: You stated in your interview in No Place to Hide that you wanted us to “imagine sitting in a room with 25 people, most of which have graduate degrees, from Columbia and other well-known educational centers, and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people.” A lot of people have now had the opportunity to listen to you, and contemplate the horrors these people planned. Can you recall who these people are by name, and who the ringleaders of this plan were?

Larry Grathwohl: Conversations regarding this occurred in Cincinnati, Detroit, Flint, and Buffalo. Participants included Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Mark Rudd, Linda Evans, Jeff Jones, and many others.

Pajamas Media: Was this merely an academic matter to them, or were they serious about killing 25 million Americans that would not bend to their political will?

Larry Grathwohl: I suppose you could consider this a purely academic discussion in that the Weathermen never had the opportunity to implement their political ends. However, I can assure you that this was not the case. There was an absolute belief that they, along with the international revolutionary movement, would cause the collapse of the United States and that they would be in charge. Nixon was of great concern and how his end would be conducted. This may sound absurd in today’s context, but the Weatherman believed they would succeed.

Pajamas Media: Did they ever devise a cover story to explain to the rest of America how roughly one in ten disappeared?

Larry Grathwohl: When I suggested that this might be a difficult proposition they looked at me like I had three heads. They would be in charge! They would be in control! Who would oppose them? Lambs to the slaughter I guess.

Pajamas Media: Were any of those Weathermen involved in concocting this plan particularly excited or enthusiastic about the death camps, or was it merely a means to an end?

Larry Grathwohl: Of course they were enthusiastic as it was representative of the success of “the revolution.”

Pajamas Media: Scattered news accounts on the Internet note that you were instrumental in foiling Weather Underground attacks in February  of 1970, in Detroit. The Weathermen built two bombs targeting the Detroit Police Officers’ Association (DPOA) building and the 13th Precinct. Were the goals of these attacks symbolic property damage as were some other Weathermen attacks, or were these targets selected to kill police officers?

Larry Grathwohl: The instructions I received from Billy Ayers was that the bombs to be used in Detroit must have shrapnel (fence staples, specifically) and fire potential (propane bottles). The intention was to kill police officers.

Pajamas Media: One of the Detroit bombs was to be placed on the side of the DPOA building, and the blast was likely to cause damage to the adjacent Red Barn Restaurant, which had mostly African-American customers. Who ordered the attack, and what did he say when you told him that innocent civilians would be killed?

Larry Grathwohl: When I objected to Billy Ayers that more innocent people would be killed in the restaurant, he replied, “Innocent people have to die in a revolution.” Billy also acknowledged during a criticism session in Buffalo that Bernadine placed the bomb at the Park Police Station which resulted in the death of Police Officer McDonnell.

Pajamas Media: Bill Ayers came out of hiding around 1980, became an college professor, and has served on numerous boards and foundations. Do you think he’s changed in his radicalism?

Larry Grathwohl: Has Billy changed? I hardly think so.

Pajamas Media: If conditions permitted, do you think Ayers would still engage in violence to further a political agenda?

Larry Grathwohl: He has acknowledged his support of anti-American groups and stated he felt that the Weathermen hadn’t done enough.

Pajamas Media: Do you consider Bill Ayers an attempted mass murderer?

Larry Grathwohl: I’m not certain Billy is a mass murder; his ego just wants him to be in charge. Note that Billy never does anything that involves risk. He has no problem allowing his women to do the evil task, Diane Oughton and even Bernardine, but never him. As for what he might do, hasn’t he said he doesn’t rule out the possibility of future bombings? [Ayers said he didn’t “want to discount the possibility” in this New York Times article from  September 11, 2001. — Ed.]

Pajamas Media: Would you let your children attend a college or university class taught by Ayers or his wife, Bernadine Dohrn? What would you tell parents who have had their children exposed to Ayers’ academic programs, like the Small Schools Workshop?

Larry Grathwohl: As for Billy’s ideas on education, isn’t it apparent? Reading, writing, and arithmetic aren’t important! Radicalism is what’s important. Fits right in with the Billy Ayers view of creating mindless soldiers to follow his commands — where best to lay the foundations of a revolution than with the young?

Pajamas Media: Do you think there is there any way that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama could not have known that Bill Ayers was a domestic terrorist? Is there any reason that the American people should accept Barack Obama’s newest excuse about his relationship with Bill Ayers, where Obama claimed that he thought Ayers was “reformed”?

Larry Grathwohl: If we are to believe Mr. Obama, he just didn’t know Billy was as radical as he apparently is. Really? Just like he didn’t know the Rev. Wright was as radical as he is? Obama is a politician and he wants me to believe that he never discussed politics with the Rev Wright or Billy Ayers?

So, while Rosanne, in and of herself, is an irrelevant has-been, her statements point to larger problem with our leftists.  While they claim tolerance and diversity, they all too often advocate or participate in violence.  Also, quite a few of them advocate for Communism, and we all know that Communism results in deaths by the millions.  When pressed, it seems that at least some of them openly advocate killing those that oppose them.  Should we  be concerned with this?  We should consider that history teaches us when such rhetoric is ignored, it can often be translated into action.  So, it up to us to monitor and expose this for what it is, an advocacy of  tyranny.

Share
  • http://americaswatchtower.com Steve Dennis

    Thanks for the link Matt. I wouldn’t take what she said serious either on its own but, as you said, this is how many on the left feel and when you look at these “Occupy Wall Street” protests you see a communist revolution in the making. This is exactly how most communistr revolutions begin; people in power creating class warfare by pitting the classes against one another while claiming to be the party of the working class. This is what is happening right now and that is why I think Roseanne’s words are of importance.

  • http://www.bunkerville.wordpress.com Bunkerville

    It is just more of the constant drumbeat of anarchy. Right out of Ann Coulter’s book Demonic which describes this action exactly in every revolution.

  • http://www.manhattaninfidel.com Infidel de Manahatta

    Typical of leftists. They are cowards and will have others do their dirty work.

    Also, have these idiots figured out that when the revolution happens they will be among the first to go?