Conservative Hideout 2.0 Rotating Header Image

Articles of Impeachment for Libya 2.0, the Syria Chapter

Share

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta made some pretty unconstitutional statements during a session of the Senate Armed Services Committee. The committee was discussing options to address the genocide occurring in Syria, and Panetta said that if the Obama administration decides to attack Syria, it would inform Congress after any decision has been made.

Here are his remarks, emphasis mine:

Our goal would be to seek international permission and we would come to the congress and inform you and determine how best to approach this,” Panetta said. “Whether or not we would want to get permission from the congress, I think those are issues I think we would have to discuss as we decide what to do here.” – Source

Conservative stalwart, Jeff Sessions, GOP Senator from Alabama said that Panetta’s remarks left him ‘breathless‘ when he heard the Secretary of Defense make such a bold statement:

“I am all for having international support, but I am really baffled by the idea that somehow an international assembly provides a legal basis for the United States military to be deployed in combat,” Sessions said. “They can provide no legal authority. The only legal authority that is required to deploy the United States military is of the congress and the president and the law and the constitution.”

World Net Daily reports that Rep. Walter B. Jones Jr., R-N.C., has introduced a resolution declaring that shoudl the president use offensive military force without authorization of an act of Congress, “it is the sense of Congress” that such an act would be “an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor.”

Let the president be duly warned.

Specifically, Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution reserves for Congress alone the power to declare war, a restriction that has been sorely tested in recent years, including Obama’s authorization of military force in Libya.

In an exclusive WND column, former U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo claims that Jones introduced his House Concurrent Resolution 107 in response to startling recent comments from Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta. – Source

“Well, I’m almost breathless about that,” Sessions responded, “because what I heard you say is, ‘We’re going to seek international approval, and then we’ll come and tell the Congress what we might do, and we might seek congressional approval.’ And I just want to say to you that’s a big [deal].”

Asked again what was the legal basis for U.S. military force, Panetta suggested a NATO coalition or U.N. resolution.

Sessions was dumbfounded by the answer. – Source

Here is the exchange:

Amazing, just amazing. Here is the full wording of H. Con. Res. 107, which is currently referred to the House Committe on the Judiciary.

Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a president without prior and clear authorization of an act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution.

Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the territory of the United States, the use of offensive military force by a president without prior and clear authorization of an act of Congress violates Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under Article I, Section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution. – Source

What is going on here is this: Obama is slipping in the polls and the biggest complaint that the American citizens is that he has no leadership skills; he lacks a backbone.

What better way for Obama to get some “street cred” with voters, than by blowing a way a tiny little country. I have no doubt that in the coming weeks, we will hear the press make the case against Syria and for US military action.

The bump in the polls that Obama would get, right before the elections could very well be crucial enough to get the job done.

So there you have it, the ends justifying the means, and this President doesn’t care one whit want branch he uses to further his agenda. And remember this also about Obama: He is always, ALWAYS looking out for his own best interest.

This is just another in a looooooooong chain of Constitutionkll

Share
  • http://www.manhattaninfidel.com Infidel de Manahatta

    It seems that it has become respectable in “intelligent” circles to regard the Constitution as an outdated impediment.

    Truly a scary phenomenon.

  • http://www.Bunkerville.wordpress.com Bunkerville

    It is pretty late in the day for Congress now to complain. We had Libya, Egypt, now soldiers in 4 African countries that no one is talking about, we have drones killing U.S. citizens. and Congress? Barely a murmur.

  • http://conservativehideout.com Matt

    This is rather stunning. It seems that they’ll do or say anything they want.

  • http://rightwingtheocrat.blogspot.com.au/ Right Wing Theocrat

    This is entirely in line with progressive thinking, they see the US not as a nation that stands strong and proud, but rather as one that is subservient to unelected UN bodies.

    It speaks volumes about obamas respect for the American people that he will ask permission from the UN or Nato but not from his true masters, the people.

    Off course the UN and/or Nato will only be happy to authorize military action by America, it means they can sit on their fat asses while you do the work and if you dare to make a mistake, all those scumbags will shuffle out to the podium to tut-tut at those boorish Americans.

    obama and his gaggle of arrogant fools are not bit to lead America, kick them out America, tell them to shove off to the UN or some other toothless, morally bankrupt outfit. obama and co will be perfectly at home there.

  • http://americaswatchtower.com Steve Dennis

    The Congress let him get away with it in Libya and now he thinks he can do whatever he wants to. This should serve as a little reminder that he does have to answer for his actions. I hope the Congress doesn’t back down this time they way it did in Libya.

  • Pingback: Right Wing Extremists: March 13, 2012 | REPUBLICAN REDEFINED()