Traitor Or Idiot: You Decide–Bob asked a simple question.
Traitor Or Idiot: You Decide–Bob asked a simple question.
Setting aside the legal criteria required to hold the office of the President, it doesn’t much matter whether a man was born in Oahu or Lower Slobbovia. The essence of being American means subscribing to a set of principles on governorship as codified in the U.S. Constitution. By that measure — which is the only one that really counts — Barack Obama (and by extension, the modern Democratic Party) is as anti-American as it gets.
“President Obama has strengthened Israel’s defense in concrete and unprecedented ways …”— White House blog
“They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch?” — Zbigniew Brzezinski, Former national security advisor to Jimmy Carter
The Bethlehem-based news agency Ma’an has cited a Kuwaiti newspaper report Saturday, that US PresidentBarack Obama thwarted an Israeli military attack against Iran’s nuclear facilities in 2014 by threatening to shoot down Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran. Following Obama’s threat, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu was reportedly forced to abort the planned Iran attack. According to Al-Jarida, the Netanyahu government took the decision to strike Iran some time in 2014 soon after Israel had discovered the United States and Iran had been involved in secret talks over Iran’s nuclear program and were about to sign an agreement in that regard behind Israel’s back. The report claimed that an unnamed Israeli minister who has good ties with the US administration revealed the attack plan to Secretary of State John Kerry, and that Obama then threatened to shoot down the Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran. (Report: Obama Threatened to Shoot Down IAF Iran Strike)
“I told you guys the Senate GOP would screw us over on DHS funding, but even I had no idea Mitch McConnell would capitulate so easily. I assumed he’d do a major song and dance first, but instead he just went all Ned Beatty in Deliverance the moment Barack Obama looked at him funny.” –Eunuch Mitch McConnell Squeals Like a Pig
“This is a total victory for the Obama position,” said a GOP senator unhappy with McConnell’s plan
“Counterfeiters use the reputation of a trademark, which brand manufacturers have built up on the basis of the quality of their products, to fool consumers about the true origin and quality of the goods.” — Wikipedia
Last November, Americans voted out the turkeys. The noxious policies of Obama and the
Socialists Democrats were given the old heave-ho, like holiday giblets gone gamy. The Grand Old Party was handed both houses of Congress in the kind of landslide victory seen about as often as Halley’s Comet. Rejoicing was heard throughout the land — at least, that part of the land which still subscribed to old fashioned notions like the rule of law. Little did we realize that we’d voted in counterfeits, cheap knock-offs that looked good in the display case, but fell apart once they got in the rain.
Two months in, and the GOP has retreated more often than the Royal Italian Army. If these are the mutts we’re looking to for salvation, it’s time to head for the shelters. Republicans under the direction of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker John Boehner have surrendered to the Democrats on every issue, from immigration to net neutrality. They’ve rubber-stamped Obama’s new attorney-general nominee, Eric Holder Light. If we don’t need a new army, we sure as hell need some new generals to run the old one.
After going to the Senate floor and slamming Obama’s executive amnesty in November, McConnell hoisted the white flag of surrender … Obama attacked the time-honored American tradition of separation of powers with his executive amnesty and for that reason alone, House Speaker John Boehner and Mitch McConnell should’ve gone to the mat and done everything necessary in their power to overturn it. However, the GOP leadership and “establishment” don’t really want to change how Washington works. There’s something wrong with a party that can be frightened with just a dirty look into not shutting what is one of the most useless departments of the Federal government and at the same time, claims to be for Constitutional and limited government. This is why the American people and conservatives are angry at them and don’t trust them.(After The Latest Mitch McConnell Surrender, Why Should Conservatives Even Bother Supporting Republicans)
People love to hear themselves talk, particularly if they have nothing to say. In fact, the less they have to say, the more often they tend to say it. This is true of most people, but most especially those incorrigible swindlers that a negligent electorate unaccountably installs into the seats of power. Anyone announcing a desire to run for office should be immediately disqualified from doing so. The 114th United States Congress proves the point.
“Ex-NYC mayor Rudolph Giuliani’s statement that Barack Obama was influenced by communists in his youth and doesn’t love his country isn’t nearly as fascinating as the reaction to it.” – Selwyn Duke
“In Obama [the media] see themselves. What he wants to carry out is what they want and they are going to do what they can to make sure these last two years he gets to do just that, the consequences be damned. So whether it is going after Rudy Giuliani or going after a Congressional staffer for a slight against the Obama daughters, the media is going to be out to defend Obama at all costs. That’s what the palace guard does … ‘They fight for his successes. He cannot fail.’”– Jay Caruso
“Was it that what Giuliani said was demonstrably false? Was it that Barack Obama is supposed to be considered innocent until proven guilty? Anyone who simply looks at the factual evidence as to whether Obama loves America, or does not, will find remarkably little to suggest love and a large amount of evidence, over a long period of years, showing his constant close association with people fiercely hostile to this country.” – Thomas Sowell
Does Barack Obama love his country? I suppose the answer to that depends on which country is actually his. One thing’s for sure: our national media will never bother to find out. These ersatz scriveners of ours are as malodorous as an outdoor privy in July. Instead of determining the veracity of Giuliani’s charges, our domestic dung beetles rush to attack his character, his motives, his very sanity. This is what passes for mainstream journalism in 21st century America. If you’re looking for investigative reporting (unless you’re investigating a conservative), you’d better look online — and you’d better do it fast. Because Obama and the Democrats are about to shut down their critics.
Critics of President Obama’s “net neutrality” plan call it ObamaCare for the Internet. That’s unfair to ObamaCare. Both ObamaCare and “Obamanet” submit huge industries to complex regulations. Their supporters say the new rules had to be passed before anyone could read them. But at least ObamaCare claimed it would solve long-standing problems. Obamanet promises to fix an Internet that isn’t broken.(From Internet to Obamanet)
The real problem isn’t with what Giuliani said; it’s that he didn’t say enough.
“[Obama‘s] but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more: it is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
– President Obama, America’s Nero
“At the risk of being melodramatic, it must nonetheless be said: We are in a war for civilization itself, and Barack Obama is not on the right side.” — Quin Hillyer
“It appears that by a three to one margin presidential scholars are now convinced that Barack Obama has been the worst president ever. For as far left as most in academia are, this is quite a shock, really.” –Most Presidential Experts Agree: Obama is Worst President In History
“I tried new positions
I learned his friends names
I made myself sit through football games
Oh, Been jilted
Been jilted again” – The Puppini Sisters
That old Lucky Strike advertising slogan well describes America as a whole as we enter Year Six of Obamunist mis-rule: It’s Toasted. There are no do-overs in presidential elections, so despite the fact that millions of Obama voters are belatedly realizing that they made two horrible mistakes, they (and we, and the rest of the world) are gonna have to live with the long-term ramifications of the worst decisions the American (or any) electorate ever made.
“Who’s the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him?” – Obi-wan Kenobi
“Obama gave his direction to the FCC in back in early November and lo and behold, the FCC majority has put together President Obama’s plan for Internet regulation …Obama’s plan marks a monumental shift toward government control of the Internet. It gives the FCC the power to micromanage virtually every aspect of how the Internet works … Obama’s plan to regulate the Internet is an unlawful power grab.” – FCC commissioner Ajit Pai
“The Fairness Doctrine was a policy of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, that required the holders of broadcast licenses to both present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was, in the Commission’s view, honest, equitable and balanced.” — Wikipedia
“Think of the press as a great keyboard
on which the government can play.”
? Joseph Goebbels, Reich Minister of Propaganda
Make no mistake: Barack Obama, not the FCC, is the one pulling the strings here. So-called “net neutrality,” as envisioned by Barry and the
Socialists … uh, Democrats, is no more than a thinly disguised attempt to abrogate free speech rights as guaranteed by the 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
“…the movement behind net neutrality—from President Barack Obama to New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, and reportedly to New York Senators Charles Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand—is coming from the left for political reasons. As liberal dominance of the media has waned under the shadow of FOX News, conservative talk radio and websites such as the Drudge Report, some in the Democratic Party have been looking for creative ways to maintain, or regain, the “mainstream media’s” liberal clout. Net neutrality is one way to attain their goal of dominating the media.” — Forbes
Obama supporters, useful idiots who would gleefully support the stoning of infants and puppy dogs if they thought it would help Dear Leader in his campaign against capitalism, are all in favor of so-called “net neutrality,” which they see as a large thumb in the eye of the telecom giants instead of what it really is: a sucker kick to the cojones of American freedom.
See more unbridled narcissism here: Which image of Obama mugging for BuzzFeed’s cameras diminishes the presidency the most, ranked
The dwindling number of America’s Obamunists are wont to defend such unseemly presidential preening as mere horseplay. No argument here. In what other kind of play would a horse’s ass indulge?
“For the last six years, Obama has acted as if the biggest threat to American security in that part of the world is the Israeli government…” – Charles Krauthammer
“Obama followed up his recent probing and informative interviews with YouTube celebrities by granting an interview to liberal blog Vox, during which he claimed the terror attack on a Paris kosher deli was “random.” It isn’t clear what the president means by calling the attacks “random.” The deli shooter, Amedy Coulibaly, had previously pledged support for ISIS, and his wife even recently filmed a propaganda video for the group calling for more terror attacks on France. Furthermore, the choice of target was far from random. Porte de Vincennes was a kosher deli servicing the local Jewish community. All four of Coulibaly’s murdered hostages were French Jews…“ — Yahoo Finance
“Obama has sparked some widespread fury over his recent comments to Vox about the Jewish individuals who were brutally killed by terrorists in Paris — specifically, he labeled them “a bunch of folks” who were randomly shot … Obama went on, seeming to place the blame for terrorist attacks at the feet of the United States.” —Washington Times
“Amedy Coulibaly said openly and proudly that he was targeting Jews. No one disputes this, except for Barack Obama … And we know he’s perfectly comfortable denouncing crimes committed in “in the name of Christ” no matter how ancient they may be. But crimes in the name of Allah must not be named as such — or at all.” — Jonah Goldberg
Had the Bataan Death March been orchestrated by Muslims instead of the Imperial Japanese Army, Barack Obama would have labeled it a random act of hiking.
Not much explanation needed. The President of the United States is either a Muslim or the best imitation anyone’s ever seen of one.
“[Castro] has been a mythological figure to the left-wing press since the 1950s. For 40 years they’ve chosen to ignore the repressive nature of this Stalinist regime that has done so much to try to harm America.” – Brent Bozell
“Obama’s dirty deal with Raul [Castro] will make the worst president in American history Castro’s new best friend … This was not a prisoner exchange. This was a Communist bailout … The Castro regime is on its last legs. Its sponsors in Moscow and Caracas are going bankrupt due to failing energy prices. The last hope of the Butcher of Havana was a bailout from Washington D.C. And that’s exactly what Obama gave him.” –Daniel Greenfield
“Obama is a tyrant the same way FDR was a tyrant. He has a view of presidential power that states: the government is in control of the country, and the president is in charge of the government. He’s taken an imperial view of the presidency.” – David Mamet
Who knows, maybe the old Soviet Union will make a comeback and Obama can re-establish diplomatic relations with them too. First Fidel, then the heirs of ol’ Nick Kruschchev, then missiles aimed at Miami. What the heck, he’s already helping the Iranians aim theirs.
Our befuddled media mavens, ideological descendants of the same ’50s scriveners who refused to admit that Castro was a commie until he admitted it himself, are naturally wetting their “unbiased” pink panties over Obama’s Cuban initiative. They, of course, are the same noisome crew who crowed “We’re All Socialists Now!” in 2009, as Red Barry prepared to boldly go where no U.S. president had gone before — on his first global apology tour. Six years later, with an unbroken string of domestic and foreign policy disasters on the presidential rap sheet, you’d think they’d know better than to continue to put their faith in the man who handed much of the Middle East over to a gang of crucifixated, decapitating goat molesters, unilaterally laid a welcome mat over our southern border, refused to enforce any law he found ideologically suspect, and ran our already untenable national debt up by $7 trillion or so dollars. Which is a lot of moola, even if a buck today will only buy you what 4 cents did in 1914.
Unless you like overpriced cigars, this is bound to be a bad deal for Americans.
“John Boehner has just squandered the election results before the Republicans even are sworn in.” – Rush Limbaugh
“$2.5 billion for illegal immigrants and Obamacare is funded through the fiscal year, that’s a conservative speaker? I don’t think so. It’s a sad day that John Boehner doesn’t realize that there was an election … he is everything that’s wrong with Washington. He’s a Democratic Party-lite … He should not be the speaker. He should be replaced.” – Sean Hannity
“I think he ought to be able to pick up some Democratic votes for speaker this time.” – Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas)
Barack Obama might consider John Boehner to be his own personal Santa Claus, but for those folks who believe that amnesty and Obamacare are roughly as desirable as an outbreak of herpes in a nunnery — in other words, most of America — the House Weeper is the Grinch who stole Christmas.
The Obama/Boehner bill is a piece of pork-laden profligacy so atrocious that even a pair of demented hard-core leftists like Nancy Pelosi and the Cherokee Bolshevik from Massachusetts opposed it — and anytime a statist duo like that turns its back on a trillion-plus dollars in proposed federal spending, you know something stinks worse than a road-killed polecat on the 4th of July. Pelosi and Red Lizzie Warren, of course, are never against spending per se, just on who is permitted to do it. This places them, for once, on the same side of the wire as El Rushbo:
[Campaign finance] limits have practically been obliterated, which means that corporate donors can just start giving left and right. It used to be a limit of $37,000. Now it’s $737,000, something. It’s incredible. But the point of it, do you know why it’s in there? You know why? The Republicans put it in. You know why it’s in there, folks? This is how corporate America’s gonna defeat the Tea Party … it’s a Republican establishment ploy that kind of dovetails nicely with Obama sicking the IRS on the Tea Party to basically eliminate them as a viable threat by relaxing a registration in Dodd-Frank that pretty much permits corporations to spend any kind of money they want on politics … Obama and John Boehner want a bill that the bases of their respective parties reject.
Red Liz, on the other hand, has built a career on bashing Wall Street, a pastime popular since the halcyon days of old Jay Gould (“I can hire one-half of the working class to kill the other half.”). Not that some of those sticky-fingered stock swindlers and felonious financiers don’t deserve a decent bashing now and again. But, just as not every Democrat is a communist agent (there’s probably one or two socialists), not everyone in the financial markets makes their living by stealing bread from the mouths of widows, orphans, and disabled war veterans. In fact, without Wall Street, America might well be Mexico without the high standard of living. In which case, we’d all be sneaking across their border.
Meanwhile, Boehner-clone Mitch McConnell and the beady-eyed pickpocket, Harry Reid, have professed surprise that Ted Cruz and Mike Lee are holding up the vote on the Cromnibus in the Senate:
[…] the two Republican lawmakers demanded a vote on a proposal to cut funds from the bill that could be used to implement President Obama’s new immigration policy, ending any chance the measure could clear the Senate and be sent to the White House with a minimum of fuss … Senate Republican leaders have pledged to challenge Obama’s immigration policy early in the new year, after the GOP takes control of the Senate. But Cruz suggested they shouldn’t be entirely trusted to keep their pledge. “We will learn soon enough if those statements are genuine and sincere,” he said, in a clear reference to Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell and Speaker John Boehner.
Why in the world would Ted think that? Maybe because every time McConnell and Boehner enter the ring, they throw up their hands and holler “NO MAS!” before the bell sounds for Round One.
“Unlike earlier immigrants who came to our shores for religious freedom, freedom from political oppression, or for jobs, we now have poorly educated, low-skill immigrants who have chosen to snub their noses at the U.S. immigration laws and come in illegally to receive billions in U.S. entitlements…” – Carole Hornsby Haynes
“The man who will oversee President Obama’s new temporary amnesty said Tuesday that part of the reason for the program was to get the illegal immigrants working on the books, making it economically impossible for them ever to be deported by a future president.” — Stephen Dinan
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday morning that the Democrats’ key to success in 2016 is to “embrace” the very same government that a majority of Americans utterly loathe. – Red Alert Politics
“Now, does that mean everybody is going to listen to me on the other side? Not necessarily. They’re pretty sure I’m an illegal immigrant.” – Barack Obama
Lizzie Warren, that erstwhile Cherokee from Harvard U, may be an ersatz Indian, but her harebrained politics are only too real. And, since she’s a natural-born lefty, she won’t have to worry when Obama replaces his domestic opponents with undocumented Democrats from Mumbai and Mexico, a process that’s well underway, aided and abetted by the very Republicans the American people elected to stop it.
Right after Obama’s executive amnesty announcement, the White House confirmed to the Washington Post that illegal aliens who get amnesty from Obama—paid for by Boehner, and any Republican who votes for this omnibus bill—will have access to Social Security benefits. (Breitbart)
Actually, House Speaker Boehner and his Congressional co-conspirators won’t be paying one thin dime. The amnesty tab, like the invoice for Obamacare, will be picked up by the bleeding taxpayer, assuming he has any flesh on his bones after his “representatives” get done flogging him. Happy Holidays!
Speaking of the winter celebration whose Name-May-No-Longer-Be-Uttered, it appears that our less-than-American President is — Fa la la la la, la la la la — trolling the ancient Yuletide Carol for partisan purposes. And he’s mangling the story of the Nativity in order to justify by Scripture what he cannot justify by the Constitution:
Obama was on the road quoting the Bible again. This time he was equating Mary and Joseph to illegal aliens and strangers.
Liberals love to quote the Bible when it suits them. They denounce the Bible because of its very clear stand against same-sex sexuality, but claim that it teaches a form of economic socialism, and in that case, we should follow it. Every Christmas season, liberals make some socialistic appeal to Scripture in an attempt to support their arguments for bigger government. (Obama Says Christmas Story is About Illegal Aliens)
Next thing ya know, he’ll be donning his gay apparel and telling us that the three wise men were really Marx, Lenin, and Billy Ayers. These days, there’s more Red in the White House than in Rudolph the Reindeer’s nose.
“It is said that power corrupts, but actually it’s more true that power attracts the corruptible. The sane are usually attracted by other things than power.” – David Brin
“She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.” – Jerry Zeifman, Retired General Counsel & Chief of Staff of the House Judiciary Committee
“When in public, Hillary smiles and acts graciously. As soon as the cameras are gone, her angry personality, nastiness, and imperiousness become evident.” – Ronald Kessler
“Hillary, like her husband, has a mouth that would embarrass a sailor.” – Capitol Hill Blue
“F**k off! It’s enough I have to see you shit-kickers every day, I’m not going to talk to you too!! Just do your G*damn job and keep your mouth shut.” –Hillary to her State Trooper body guards after one of them greeted her with “Good Morning”
“The Clinton mode of production, then, is running for office or serving in office. That is the material basis for the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton lifestyle and the whole Clinton institutional structure. In order to keep this mode of production from breaking down, the Clintons–one of them, at any rate–must be at least potentially in the running for a powerful office at all times.” – A Marxist Analysis of Hillary
“The idea of a man-hating, pants-suit-wearing, oyster-gobbling woman sitting in the Ovary Office should make any right-thinking American male’s testicles retreat slightly up into his body.” — Jim Goad
Hillary Clinton, former Arkansas cattle futures baroness, self-proclaimed co-presidentduring the randy reign of her philandering spouse, carpet-bagging U.S. senator, faux New York Yankees fan, and the Secretary of State who engineered both the infamous Russian “reset” and the deadly blunders of Benghazi, is the likely choice to replace the current Jackass in the White House when said Jackass’s term of office blessedly expires. But the misguided socialists who believe this overrated battleaxe possesses the makings of a chief executive must have their skulls full of top-shelf ganja. Hillary’s major attributes have always been a vindictive nature, a foul mouth, a ruthless disregard for the U.S. Constitution, and a dearth of testicles. The latter qualifies her only as the standard bearer for America’s disgruntled legions of lesbians and feminists, while the former identifies her as a modern Democrat. Come to think of it, so does the latter.
As for the persistent rumors regarding Hillary’s own amorous preferences, would it really matter if she were, to put it in the vulgar argot of sailors and longshoremen, a clam-licker? Not as much as one might think … In the sake of fairness and accuracy and discretion, it is first prudent that I review whatever evidence may exist that Clinton has indulged in rank carnality with members of her own gender … compelling is Clinton’s lifelong predilection for wearing pants suits. No heterosexual woman in her right mind would be caught dead wearing those things in public.
The rumor-mongers suggest that Clinton first developed a taste for vagina during her radical younger days at Wellesley College, where she roomed for four solid years with confirmed lesbian Eldie Acheson, a woman whose face is butch enough to saw lumber. And this photo of a young, pre-Clinton-era Hillary Rodham standing alongside college president Ruth Adams is more lesbian than a pile of Ellen Degeneres’s unwashed laundry. (Does it Matter if Hillary Clinton Is a Carpet-Muncher?)
Since being given the bum’s rush by Premier Obama, the Arkansas Traveler has occupied her leisure time by fabricating a memoir (most copies of which were remaindered the same week they went on sale), and in obsessively padding an already pudgy bank account by speaking at a number of public universities for around $300 grand a pop. All in the name of charity, of course — hers:
Clinton has attempted to tamp down the uproar over her greedy cash grab from a number of public universities with the claim that she donated all of her speaking fees to charity — the charity of course being the Clinton Foundation. That likely means she is able to keep the money close and still write it off as a charitable tax deduction.(Hillary Clinton’s $275K Speaking Fee Comes with Diva Demands)
The old termagant has a helluva racket going.
[…] Clinton received $225,000 to speak at the [October 13 UNLV]fundraiser, a discount from her initial $300,000 asking price. But the fee was only the first of Clinton’s many stipulations. The former Secretary of State insists on staying in the ‘presidential suite’ of a luxury hotel of her staff’s choice, with up to five other rooms reserved for her travel aides and advance staff. Clinton also reportedly requires that the Foundation provide a private plane. However, the jet can not be any private plane; only a $39 million, 16-passenger Gulfstream G450 “or larger” will do the job. (Hillary Clinton requires ‘presidential suite,’ stenographer for speaking engagements, report says)
Despite Hillary’s relentless quest for power (or perhaps because of it), her nomination as the next president is not quite as certain as it was before she began sticking her foot in her foul mouth on college campuses across the country.
Is the market in Hillary Clinton futures collapsing? Quite possibly so. A year ago Clinton seemed likely to become the next president … Things look different now … over the course of 2014, Clinton’s favorability ratings have declined. Her memoir of her Cabinet service had a curiously defensive title — “Hard Choices” — and her book tour was something like the opposite of a ringing success. Sales were slim, and readership probably even slimmer.The prospect of a Clinton presidency may thrill a few aging feminists, but few others seem to find her very interesting. (Latest polls paint Hillary as yesterday’s story)
The derailment of Hillary’s ambition is bound to have consequences, especially for those unfortunate enough to be in her immediate proximity. “It is better to live in a corner of the roof than in a house shared with a contentious woman.” (Proverbs 25:24):
[Hillary] is notorious for her explosive temper. As a child, she punched a classmate when he accidentally bumped his bike into hers. She also punched her friend in the nose for giving away a baby rabbit (from a warren that she told him to guard) … Her explosive temper would continue through her political days. When Bill Clinton was starting on his political career, a staff member told her that she was rumored to be a lesbian, and to deny rumors. She replied “it’s nobody’s God d**n business.” When the staff member persisted that she deny the rumors, she then replied “f**k this s**t!”
After Bill was elected President, Hillary’s temper tantrums continued. Bill and Hillary were said to have referred to each other as “f***ing jerk” and “f***ing b***h” prior to the inauguration. Hillary was said to have thrown objects at Bill and/or Secret Service agents, ranging from lamps to the Bible. At one point she called Bill a “stupid mother f***er”. On another occasion, she burst into a room in the White House and asked a Secret Service agent “where’s the miserable c***sucker?” As a result, she became the most feared woman in the Clinton Administration. And she could turn her wrath on and off in a heartbeat. (Hillary Clinton’s State of Mind)
This is not the person whose finger you want on the nation’s nuclear trigger. Or, for that matter, on anything else.
“Hands up, don’t shoot” — all while the Obama administration is fleecing the taxpayers. – Allen B. West
“In an average year, about 16,000 Americans are murdered, so police killings are maybe two percent of that number. Over half of all murder victims are African-Americans, and almost all of them are killed by other African-Americans. Overall, African-Americans commit murder in the United States at a rate seven times their share of the population … One might think that the far larger murder toll that does not involve police would be a much bigger story than the few controversial cases of white cops killing black civilians. That this is not the case reflects the role of today’s media, which feeds off of the white cops killing black civilian stories almost as much as they love hurricanes and tornadoes and airplane disasters.” – Israel, Ferguson and the global Left
“You [demagogues] are like the fishers for eels; in still waters they catch nothing, but if they thoroughly stir up the slime, their fishing is good; in the same way it’s only in troublous times that you line your pockets.” –Aristophanes
In the aftermath of the Missouri riots and the unruly protests in Comrade DeBlasio’s Big Red Apple, the admonition found in Exodus 23:2 is as applicable now as it was back in Moses’ day, when no one had ever heard of Molotov or his cocktail: “You shall not follow a crowd to do evil.”
It stands to reason then that incitements to the mob, such as those presented by Barack Obama and his retiring henchman Eric Holder are also condemned from on High. From now on, those two should probably stay indoors during electrical storms.
Obama has continually undermined police departments around the country, and his demand for more training fits that pattern. In 2009, he jumped to the conclusion that Cambridge, Massachusetts police “acted stupidly” when they arrested Henry Gates. He personalized the Trayvon Martin investigation in a way that to many implied the murder was radically motivated. And yet again last week, he emphasized that the anger to the verdict was “an understandable reaction” and blacks’ distrust of police is “rooted in realities.”
Nevertheless, whatever Obama implies, there was absolutely no evidence Officer Darren Wilson was motivated by race and he did exactly what he should have done. Brown’s robbery of the convenience store, his decision to reach into the police car and punch Wilson while trying to take his gun, and finally Brown’s decision to charge Wilson was what caused the teen’s death.
The communist and racist New Black Panther Party plotted to bomb St. Louis’ Gateway Arch and assassinate local law enforcement officials, but the Justice Department so far has limited its prosecution of the group to an indictment of two members on minor gun charges. The soft treatment for activities that normally would have brought federal terrorism charges appears to be part of efforts by Attorney General Eric Holder and the Justice Department to “go soft” on the racist group, according to former Justice official J. Christian Adams.
“I have always been perplexed why these guys get special treatment,” said Adams, who worked in the Justice Department Civil Rights Division and noted a similar conciliatory legal treatment of New Black Panther Party members in a 2008 case of voter intimidation by the group in Philadelphia. In the earlier case against the Panthers, voter intimidation charges were dropped by the Justice Department against the Panthers, and charges were downgraded against one group member, King Shabazz, in what critics say was an effort to show official favoritism toward the group.
And while the rubes and the pundits are busy watching this game of racial 3-Card Monte, Obama and his gang continue to undermine our friends in order to play footsie with our enemies:
Senior White House and State Department officials have recently met to discuss the possibility of imposing sanctions on Israel in an effort to stop housing construction projects in eastern Jerusalem …
“If these reports are true, this would mark a new era of unprecedented hostility from the White House against our strongest ally in the Middle East,” a senior congressional aide stated. “It’s impossible not to notice the irony of the administration mulling sanctions on Israel while threatening to veto new sanctions against Iran.”
The White House has officially rejected a ‘We the People’ petition calling for the U.S. Government to declare the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization after more than a year and 200,000 signatures …
“We have not seen credible evidence that the Muslim Brotherhood has renounced its decades-long commitment to non-violence.”
The United States must use “all of the tools at our disposal” to deal with the threat posed by Americans and other Westerners who go to Syria and Iraq to fight with ISIS, a State Department official told Congress on Tuesday. But so far, that does not include revoking the passports of U.S. citizens who have traveled to Syria to fight with ISIS.
Meanwhile, it’s being reported that Obama has been hospitalized for a sore throat brought on by acid reflux disease. It’s only fair. He’s been giving Real Americans heartburn since 2008.
“In a desperate email sent to Obama supporters this morning, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee suggested that unless liberals show that they are ‘still standing with President Obama,’ their beloved leader could end up in the slammer.” – Joe Miller
It gets a bit tiresome railing about Barack Obama. On the other hand, there’s so much to rail about. The man’s elevation to an office he had no business entering unless it was to empty the ashtrays has been a catastrophe of the first order — and if you don’t think so by now, then you’re probably either gay and proud, a newly legalized illegal alien, or a hardcore member of the destructive party that foisted him on us in the first place. America would be better off with genital warts than Democrats. Think I’m kidding? Ponder, if you will this excerpt from the New York Post:
Obama likes to claim he’s been forced into rogue executive actions, laying the blame on an intransigent Congress. In fact, his lawlessness is coldly calculated, dating back to his days as a Chicago community organizer… Learning to run around American law was his main purpose in attending Harvard Law School, where he quickly sidled up to Professor Derrick Bell, who bashed the Constitution as a form of “original sin.” There was no reverence in studying the founding documents and the system they created, no desire to work within America’s legal framework and enforce existing law. No, Obama didn’t study federal statutes to defend them. He studied them to game them, sabotage them. To abdicate them.
Then consider this recent performance during the Ferguson riots:
… [Obama] insisted, “We have to try to understand” the anger of those who demanded nothing less than a murder charge absent an ounce of evidence as an “understandable reaction” from people who believe “the law is being applied in a discriminatory fashion.” Where did those people get that belief? Leave it to Obama to omit that critical information — the same President Obama who met with protest leaders and Sharpton on Nov. 5 at the White House. It was at that unscheduled meeting the president was ostensibly “concerned about Ferguson staying on course in terms of pursuing what it was that he knew we were advocating,” according to Sharpton. “He said he hopes that we’re doing all we can to keep peace.” One is left to marvel at one of two realities. Either we have a president so utterly naive he believes a hoax-perpetrating, riot-inciting Al Sharpton, who denigrated the grand jury process, pre-organized protest rallies in 25 American cities, and uses his MSNBC platform to fire up racial unrest, is a man of peace. Or the president, who once urged his Latino followers to “punish our enemies,” remains as wedded to the same racial “us against them” mentality as America’s foremost racial arsonist. Is it really possible to believe the former?(Obama and the Roots of the Ferguson Rage)
It’s classic Cloward-Piven strategy. First you foment a crisis, and then you rush in with a left-wing cure. That is exactly what the president did during an interview on ABC’sThis Week with George Stephanopoulos … During theCloser Look segment, Barack Obama weighed in on how to fix what he helped break. As the public awaited the grand jury decision as to whether or not to indict Ferguson, Missouri Police Officer Darren Wilson for the shooting death of black teen Michael Brown, the typically anarchistic Obama saw it as an opportunity to impart guidance to law enforcement on how to profile black teenagers. That’s right – Barack Obama, who, when it comes to himself, regularly contravenes the rules and regulations, is now suddenly an expert on how law enforcement should comport themselves in tense situations. (The American Thinker)
On maybe you’d rather ruminate about what your kids are being taught in Obama’s little Red schoolhouses:
[…] the Obama White House is now urging public schools (with YOUR tax dollars no less) to honor Michael Brown with classroom memorials as a way of forming “classroom solidarity.” It is a blatantly disgusting act of divisive lies being used to manipulate students into conforming with the far left, anti-American ideals of this Age of Obama. The troubled young man who was Michael Brown is being turned into a far left caricature meant to help spread the meme of a deeply flawed and racist United States, when in fact it is Barack Obama and his race baiting cohorts like Al Sharpton who have more deeply divided America against itself. An effort that is apparently being vigorously supported by leading Communist organizations in America as well whose primary goal is the total destruction of this nation’s socio-political foundation. (Obama White House Pushes Public Schools To “Honor” Mike Brown)
There’s no doubt about it. We’ve hired a weasel and his brood to guard the hen house.
“I am sorry for a fellow when, every time he goes off by himself, he is in the worst company he was ever in in his life.” – Sam Jones
“The President’s unconstitutional action is a direct threat to our Republican system of government and will have catastrophic consequences for the American people. It must be stopped.” – Sen. Jeff Sessions
“Anyone who believes that the GOP will have a newly chastened Obama to deal with in 2015 must be living in one of those states where marijuana was recently legalized … his idea of compromise was for the Republicans to tell him which of his bills and policies they were ready to support.” – Burt Prelutsky
“The only group the GOP leadership is not afraid of fighting are the grassroots conservatives in their own party.” – Jeff Crouere
The official Republican response to the latest Obama usurpation? A few blustery statements of faux outrage followed by a quick trip out of town for the Thanksgiving holiday. If resistance like this had been the standard in 1776, we’d be pledging allegiance to the queen — and given this president’s lunatic obsession with institutionalizing the LGBT agenda, that’s not too far off. Even the Obama Justice Department has branded their boss a rogue:
The Secretary of Homeland Security and the Counsel to the President directed the Justice Department to investigate whether the president had the authority to take contemplated actions with regard to illegal immigrants via executive order. In a letter dated 19 November, they found he did not. On 20 November, he did it anyway.
Justice Department attorney Karl Thompson, writing for the White House Office of Legal Counsel, said:
“The Executive cannot, under the guides of exercising enforcement discretion, attempt to effectively rewrite the laws to match its policy preferences. An agency’s enforcement decisions should be consonant with, rather than contrary to, the congressional policy underlying the statutes the agency is charged with administering.”
Barack Obama has used his time in office to peddle prevarications from Timbuktu to Kalamazoo. It’s cost him the goodwill of the American people, of course, but thecommunists and the New York Times still love him. And those are the only two redlines about which he’s ever really cared.