Oklahoma Senate Passes Unborn Child Protection From Dismemberment Abortion Act


Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

 photo life is beautiful_zpsnbcfeuni.jpg

Hat/Tip to Christine Rousselle at TownHall.com.

What a sad commentary that we even need a law like this…

Oklahoma is about to join Kansas and become the second state to pass a bill banning the dilation and evacuation (D&E) abortion technique. The Oklahoma Senate voted yesterday on the Unborn Child Protection from Dismemberment Abortion Act as well as a bill that required a 72-hour waiting period for an abortion.

D&E abortions are performed in the second trimester of pregnancy, when the fetus is between the age of 12 and 24 weeks. It consists of removing pieces of the fetus with forceps.

But abortion is supposed to be quick and painless…

It is expected that Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin (R) will sign the bills. Oklahoma previously had a 24-hour waiting period before an abortion could be performed.

South Carolina and Missouri are also considering bills to ban D&E abortions in their states.





Pro-Abortion Group Goes After Republicans for Supporting a Bill Against Human Trafficking!


Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Apparently, it is better to just kill humans rather that allow them to be trafficked.  Just ask the democrats!

An abortion advocacy group is running television commercials attacking Republican members of the U.S. Senate who put helping sex trafficking victims ahead of abortion funding.

As LifeNews reported, Democrats voted a total of five times to block a bill to help sex trafficking victims in order to attempt to fund abortions with federal funds. The only Democrats to join Senate Republicans in supporting sex trafficking victims over abortion funding were Sens. Bob Casey, Pa.; Joe Donnelly, Ind.; Heidi Heitkamp, N.D.; and Joe Manchin, WV.

Now, NARAL is attacking those lawmakers who put women ahead of abortion politics:

NARAL Pro-Choice America rolled out TV ads this week against four Republican senators up for reelection in 2016, targeting them for an anti-trafficking bill that stalled over a fight on abortion.

The group launched TV spots against GOP Sens. Mark Kirk (Ill.), Kelly Ayotte (N.H.), Ron Johnson (Wis.) and Richard Burr (N.C.).

The 30-second ads suggest that the Republicans support the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act because of abortion language.

“A Senate bill would help survivors of sex trafficking to get their lives back on track,” the ad says in Illinois. “But Sen. Kirk refuses to support it, unless survivors are denied access to abortion care. Call Sen. Kirk and tell him it’s wrong to use survivors as political pawns.”

The ads will air for a week on Fox News, MSNBC and CNN in each of the senators’ states.

Leading pro-life advocates are furious that pro-abortion Democrats continue holding up vital legislation meant to help women victimized by the grisly sex trafficking trade.

“Ppro-abortion Senators are filibustering legislation that would aid victims of human trafficking for one reason: It does not include federal funding of abortion on-demand,” says Marjorie Dannenfelser of the Susan B. Anthony List, a pro-life women’s group. “That’s right: Federal funding to abort babies is so important to Harry Reid and his pro-abortion colleagues that they’re even willing to throw victims of human trafficking under the bus.”

And who exactly is using them as political pawns?  If the democrats truly cared about women, they’d pass this in a heartbeat.  However, instead of helping women, they are withholding it because the legislation doesn’t fund the killing of babies.

But it’s us Conservatives that are waging a war on women, right?


Feminist Admits Aborting Baby Because He Was a Boy: States She Didn’t Want to Bring Another “Monster Into the World”


When we say that feminism isn’t based on equality, but on hate, we are ridiculed.  The following shows why we are correct, via Weasel Zippers…

Via Pundit Press

In a stunningly evil and disgusting article, a feminist only willing to identify herself as “Lana” has described her decision to abort her child, based solely on the fact that he was a boy.

Lana begins her article by explaining that “the patriarchy has been well entrenched since the dawn of time,” and continues by writing about an argument she had with a man on an airplane, while she was pregnant, to summarize what she deemed “extreme patriarchy.”

The description of the argument is straight forward: Lana was flying to San Francisco to participate in an Occupy Wall Street rally. When the person sitting next to her found out about it, he swore at her, to which Lana responded by screaming at the top of her lungs “ASSAULT.”

After “contemplating” lying to the flight attendants and telling them that the man struck her, Lana decided to tell the truth. The flight attendants told her that they couldn’t force the man to move in response. And in response to that, Lana decided that she “could no longer depend on men to be an ally of the cause.”

The “cause,” in her mind, is feminism. Soon after, she went to the doctor and was told that she was pregnant with a boy. Her immediate response, she writes, was “my body had betrayed me even worse than the misogynistic suit jockey on the airplane so many months before. I was in shock, I started crying, weeping at the thought of what I was about to curse the world with.”

Over the course of several days, she decided that she could not bring another male into this world. She explains, “I couldn’t bring another monster into the world. We already have enough enemies as it is.”

While I think this is pretty typical for feminists, and it don’t think it need to expound on it,  Feminism was never about equality-it has always been about hate.  If anyone out there doubts that, I fear that there is little I can do for you.

I would really like to point out the section in which she was “contemplating” lying to the flight attendants.  This is typical liberal behavior.  How many fake hate crimes have been exposed?  Remember the false rape claims repeated by Rolling Stone?  Or what of the “Mattress Girl?”  Or what of, “if you like your plan. you can keep it.”  Or, for that matter, that the Earth is hotter every year?   I could write a book chronicling liberal lies.   The point is simple; whether you call is progressivism, liberalism,   communism, fascism, or any of the other titles, their beliefs and policies are all based on lies.  And, when they logical results of those policies come to light, they lie about those too.

Then again, they are following the father of lies, so I guess we shouldn’t be surprised.


UK Mom Threatened for Showing Children a Pro-Life Video


In the nanny regressive state, the state is father, and the state is mother.  And, if you dare go against the state, you can expect bad things to happen to you.  A mother in the UK found that out recently, where she dared to teach her son’s that killing babies was wrong.  Live Action News has more…

A few days before Christmas, a U.K. mother of two reached out to Christian radio show program Stand Up For Truth with a plea for prayers and support. She had been notified that Child Protection Services would be contacting her because she had permitted her children to watch the pro-life documentary 180.

The controversy began when the mother (who wishes to remain anonymous) included Gospel tracts and a card advertising the 180 movie in party favor jars for a Christmas fair. She distributed these favors at the Church of England Primary School her children attend, and where she was employed at the time. The U.K. mother noted in her letter to the radio program:

I was immediately suspended and told not to reveal any of the details to anyone. I was made to attend an investigative meeting with strict instructions that no legal representation was allowed. The school leadership and the HR representative were pressing…that the film “180” was horrific, had it been watched by a child, even a child who is 10 to 11.

The mother turned in her resignation, but that did not end the investigation. The school’s Board of Directors allegedly equated the parental discretion of showing the pro-life film – which displays nothing more graphic than what one would see on the History Channel – with potential child abuse.

… I was officially informed that because in the course of the meeting I had revealed to them that my children had seen the child inappropriate “180” film, they have notified the Child Protection Services and that they will be contacting me shortly.

We do not watch violent films in our household, but I feel it is important to bring up children, teaching them what is right and wrong, even if the subject is a bit heavy (like the Holocaust and abortion). When my sons were about 10 and 8, I explained to them what those things meant, and the reason I did so is because the sex-ed starts here in U.K. very early …

This show the state exerts control over the populace.  The state will attack people, using every arm at it’s disposal.   You go against policy, you lose your job.  If you teach your children right from wrong, they might be taken from you.

As I think of it, this only happens if you’re a Christian.  In the UK, it’s OK to run child-rape gangs if you are of another religion.  In fact, in that circumstance, the state will actually assist you!  But I digress.

This is coming to the US, if it isn’t here already.


Pro-Abortion Activists Steal Signs from Students


In their ongoing effort to always “keep it classy,” an apparent pro-abortion supporter decided that no other opinion than his own is permitted, and took the normal liberal action…

On February 4, 2015, Created Equal’s young pro-life demonstrators were attacked outside Beechcroft High School. Video of the incident reveals a homeowner crossing the street to berate the activists before stealing, destroying their signs.

The homeowner crossed the street to the public sidewalk outside the school where Created Equal had set up. He shouted, “Get ‘em out of here or I am going to break ‘em.” He proceeded to knock over and steal signs, wrenching them out of the hands of Jami Beer, Created Equal’s Director of Campus Outreach.

A police report was filed, and Created Equal is pressing charges.

“In a culture killing its children, unfortunately sometimes abortion advocates act violently against those who defend the children. Nevertheless, we refuse to be intimidated into silence.”—Mark Harrington, Executive Director, Created Equal

Mr. Harrington nailed it.  If they are willing to support the killing of babies, there isn’t a whole lot left off the table in terms of actions against those that resist the killing of said babies.


GOP Runs Scared, Pulls Bill Banning 20 Week Abortion


Abortion Kills

If there is one thing I have run out of, it is patience with the GOP. This started after the abysmal showing in the Presidential election of 2012. Since that time, we have seen a continual slide towards the acceptance of amnesty for illegal immigrants. That, along with other pandering, was aimed at Hispanic voters. The GOP seemed set on the idea that 2012 was lost because of alienation of Hispanics. Never mind that so many conservatives stayed home because they didn’t want to vote for Mitt Romney. This shows a complete lack of conviction on the part of the GOP leadership and a lack of nerve to follow whatever convictions they may happen to have. That lack of conviction has again been placed on display for everyone to see.

For two years, certain members of the GOP have been working on a bill that would criminalize virtually every abortion performed after 20 weeks, with some exceptions for rape or incest. It appeared to be headed towards certain passage in the House of Representatives, until last week. That’s when grumblings started to surface. Some members of the GOP were afraid passing the bill would alienate women voters.

Fox News – The failed bill, which reflected the idea that a fetus can feel pain at 20 weeks, would have criminalized virtually all abortions for pregnancies of 20 weeks or longer. It would offer some exceptions, including for victims of rape that have already been reported to authorities.

But some Republicans, including female members of Congress, objected to that requirement, saying that many women feel too distressed to report rapes and should not be penalized. A 2013 Justice Department report calculated that just 35 percent of rapes and sexual assaults were reported to police.

The issue becomes, we’re questioning the woman’s word,” Rep. Renee Ellmers, R-N.C., said earlier Wednesday. “We have to be compassionate to women when they’re in a crisis situation.”

There were also objections to the bill’s exemption for minors who are victims of incest and have reported the incident.

“So the exception would apply to a 16-year-old but not a 19-year-old?” said Rep. Charles Dent, R-Pa. “I mean, incest is incest.”

There was concern that the bill would have looked bad for the Republican Party as it struggles to court female voters in the 2016 presidential and congressional elections, and primary and general election candidates could have turned the vote around on the Republicans. The GOP also wants to demonstrate that it can focus on issues that matter to voters and not get bogged down in gridlock.

Abortions performed after 20 weeks are considered to be late-term abortions. The unborn infant is able to feel pain and can react to stimuli from outside the womb. Even the most hardened of hearts should be able to see what a travesty abortion really is, especially after 20 weeks. It’s not about a woman’s choice to kill her unborn child, but rather about giving that child the opportunity to be born and live its life. It is about protecting the lives of our most vulnerable of God’s creation. Instead of doing that, the GOP is running scared of how it may affect the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election. To that, I would like an answer to this question. What good is winning the White House if our party is unwilling to take a stand and prevent as many murders of unborn children as possible?

I understand that this bill had little chance of becoming law, due to a sure veto by President Obama. He will certainly refuse to sign any legislation that contains anything that remotely resembles a restriction on abortion. But, iss something like this not worth taking a stand for? If not, then when do we stop backtracking on everything we believe in and start taking that stand? Do we need to allow abortion all the way until the pregnancy is full term, lest we alienate women voters? Please understand, I am not against women’s rights. I am not against them obtaining health care or any other service they need. This is not about that, or their right to privacy. It is about protecting as many unborn children as possible.

David Harsanyi points out that the placing limits on abortion has a broad support across a variety of different polls. And he isn’t not nearly as tactful as I am about pointing out how the GOP has failed by pulling the bill.

Human Events – Evidently, Republicans don’t feel competent enough to make a case against infanticide. Why else would the GOP pull its 20-week abortion limit bill?

Here’s a short list of things that are less popular than banning late-term abortions: “Acting” on climate change. “Free” community college. Taxing the wealthy. Building the Keystone XL pipeline. President Barack Obama. Future President Hillary Clinton. Every Republican who’s thinking about running for president.

A new Marist poll finds that 84 percent of Americans favor some level of further restrictions on abortion. And regardless of their feelings about the legality of the procedure, 60 percent believe it to be “morally wrong.” If you aren’t keen on that poll — it was sponsored by the Knights of Columbus, after all — you can take your pick of others.

A Quinnipiac poll found that 60 percent of women support limiting abortions to the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. A CBS News poll found that 60 percent of Americans think abortion “should not be permitted” or available only under “stricter limits.” A CNN poll found that 58 percent of Americans believe abortion should be legal only in a “few circumstances” or “always illegal.”

Yet the GOP caves on a bill that would prohibit most abortions after 20 weeks and promises instead to pass another worthless ban on taxpayer-funded abortions — which we all know can be ignored by hiring an accountant.

Polls change. Polls don’t make you right. I know. But this week marks the 42nd anniversary of Roe v. Wade. And while the media continue to treat every Obama non-starter and crowd-pleaser as a genuine policy idea, the 20-week abortion ban was predictably framed as another divisive play by zealous conservatives. Controversial. Republican leaders helpfully confirmed this perception by abandoning the only bill their party has come up with in years that has been widely supported.

David Harsanyi is right. Polls do not necessarily may a position right or wrong, but it is clear how much support placing limits on abortion has in America. You should read the rest of his post on Human Events. It is worth taking your time to read and he is very frank about his disappointment at what has happened.

Of course, the media was already loading their guns for when the bill was passed by the GOP. They were ready and willing to paint anyone who voted for this bill as a hater of women and any other inaccurate term they could coin. It is possible this played a role in decision by the GOP to pull the bill from consideration. It is worth noting that the Democrats tried to do this with the 2014 election. They tried every tactic in the book to describe the GOP as haters of women. As you can see from the result, that didn’t work out so well for them.

What amazes me is how turncoat some Republicans have been on this issue. Again, from Human Events.

A big part of that attack was focused on abortion. It stopped working. So someone needs to inform House Republicans of this. Because the most mystifying aspect of the GOP’s retreat on the 20-week ban is that the 20-week ban is not new. Most of these same Republicans voted on the same legislation before the midterm elections, including some of the same representatives who reportedly withdrew their support for the bill. Nearly every GOP candidate running in the midterms publicly backed the idea, even in high-profile races in which Democrats made abortion the central issue of their campaign.

Why support the bill during the election, or at least the idea of the bill, and then, after you have won your election, turn your back on it? It just makes no sense to me, especially when it is clear that most Americans support the measure. The only answer I can come up with is the same one put forth by David Harsanyi.

This is about politics. Tragically incompetent politics. Even though a veto was imminent, you have to wonder: If the party representing the pro-life position, a party with a sizable majority, can’t pull together a vote on an issue as unambiguous and risk-free as this one, what are the chances of it coming to a consensus and offering compelling arguments on issues such as health care and tax reform? Very little, I imagine.

How true that paragraph is. President Obama is well known for his stance on abortion. He wants women to have 24-7 access to abortion, all the way to the end of the pregnancy. No restrictions, lest we infringe upon their right to choose. If the GOP is unable to articulate an argument against such freely available abortion and for placing limits on this barbaric practice, especially when so many Americans want that to happen, then I have to wonder what good are they actually doing in Washington.






 photo ABORTION-TERMINATES_zpsb95f2306.jpg

Imagine a world where 57,762,169 unborn children weren’t sacrificed on the altar of feminism. Imagine a world where the charnal houses of Planned Parenthood stood as silent as the ovens of Auschwitz, grim reminders of depravity, defanged. Imagine a world where the life of an unborn child is as precious as the life of a pig or a bird.

Imagine a world where our representatives had the guts to protect the unborn.

House Republican leadership tonight abruptly dropped a bill that would ban elective abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy.

According to news reports, female GOP lawmakers raised concerns on the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, prompting party leaders to realize they did not have the votes to pass the bill.

Prominent Republican members who rallied against the plan to limit late-term abortions include Reps. Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania, Renee Ellmers of North Carolina and Jackie Walorski of Indiana.

I’ll defer comments on their cowardice to my wife, who posted this on Facebook earlier today:

I am so saddened by this news. 18,000 preemies are murdered each year, 18,000. How can such a wonderful nation support these murderers. We act so compassionate for mental health, those bullied, beheading across the world, shootings of innocents, MIA, KIA, and wounded warriors. But those who passed this ‘right’ to allow such atrocities be damned. My heart is broken for those 18,000 preemies housed in a warm womb for 6 months, only to be brutally killed and disposed of like garbage. What are those who opposed this bill and those 18,000 mothers each year thinking? Moreso, what are those doctors, nurses, and caregivers, and insurance companies think they are doing for society at large? I am just so sad.

What can I add to that? Somewhere, Satan is smiling. And Jesus is weeping.

Today is the annual March For Life. It’s been 42 years since the holocaust of abortion was “legalized” by the forces of evil. 57,762,169 souls snuffed out before they could be born.

Pray with Pope Francis, pray that the hearts of our leaders will be opened.



60 percent of Americans support enacting a 20 week abortion ban. It’s inconceivable that anyone could be so callous as to not feel the suffering of these innocent babies.

And yet, abortion is the holy sacrament of feminism. A woman isn’t really liberated until she’s had one, or so I’m told.

I’ll leave you with the wisdom of President Reagan:

“I’ve noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born.” – Ronald Reagan, September 21, 1980



Planned Parenthood Chief Cecile Richards: “We Proudly” Kill Babies…


 photo cecilerichards_babykiller_zps3c41a35c.jpg

Hat/Tip to WeaselZippers.

Cecile Richards is the President of Planned Parenthood and she recently said she’s proud to kill babies.

Well, truthfully, not in so many words, but she DID say this:

“We proudly provide safe and legal abortion.”

Here is the video from that event. Then down below that is a video of an interview in which she was pressed to state when she thought life began.

As said above, the next video is from an interview and it shows Cecile Richards trying desperately to avoid the question of when life begins. On the Fusion TV program, America with Jorge Ramos, he finally pins her down to say that she believes life begins when the baby is born. So evidently Ms. Richards believes that on the last day before the end of the pregnancy, it is okay to end a baby’s life.

Margaret Sanger would be proud…





Planned Parenthood Brags About “Explosion Of” 327,653 Dead Babies In 2014


planned parenthood logo


Hat/Tip to Penny Starr at CNSNews.com.

In the letter in their 2014 Annual Report from their Chair and President, Planned Parenthood literally bragged about the “explosion of engagement among the next generation”. They went on in their report to brag about reducing teen pregnancy to a “twenty year low”.

One can only wonder if that huge number of 327,653 abortions had anything to do with lowering teen pregnancy…

Planned Parenthood clinics did 327,653 abortions in its fiscal year 2014 (which ran from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014), according to Planned Parenthood Federation of America’s newly released annual report.

That works out to an average of 37 abortions per hour or nearly 1 every 90 seconds.

And even though taxpayer dollars are NEVER supposed to fund abortions, guess what?

Planned Parenthood also received $528.4 million from government grants and reimbursements, which equaled 41 percent of its revenue.

The federal government is prohibited from paying directly for abortions through Title X family planning grants and reimbursements, however, federal funds do pay for Planned Parenthood operations, including the clinics where abortions are performed.

Remember that little fact the next time a far left loon tries to say Planned Parenthood doesn’t get tax dollars for abortions. And if they try to say that PP “focuses on contraceptives”, not abortive services.

Throw this at them. They provided MORE abortions in 2014 than they did the year before and they provided LESS contraceptives in ’14 than the previous year.

The 327,653 abortions Planned Parenthood reports that it did in its organizational fiscal 2014 exceeds by 487 the number of abortions it did the previous year.

The report also reveals that Planned Parenthood actually provided fewer contraceptives — 3,577,348 patients in fiscal 2014 compared to 3,724,558 in fiscal 2013.


 photo obamacecile_zps9bb2a7bd.jpg
Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards


Talk about your 1-percenters!

According the latest 990 form filed with the IRS for 2013, Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards’ base compensation was $396,138. Including retirement funds and other benefits, Richards’ total compensation was $492,200.

Read the full story here.
Talk about your 1-percenters!



Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards: Killing My Baby “Wasn’t A Difficult Decision”…


Obama and Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards.

Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards with President Barack Obama


Hat/Tip to WeaselZippers.

It never fails to just flabbergast me how the left can be so casual about murdering babies. Cecile Richards said that it wasn’t a difficult decision to kill her baby. I wonder, did anyone consult the baby on that decision?

Coming from the head of America’s largest abortion mill, why am I not surprised?

Via LifeNews:

The head of the nation’s biggest abortion business disclosed today that she herself had an abortion and apparently it was no big deal to take the b  life of her unborn child.

Planned Parenthood does over 330,000 abortions on an annual basis and Richards opened up about her own abortion in an essay published in Elle on Friday, writing that she thinks of more women share their abortion decisions it will stop the “stigma” surrounding abortion.

I had an abortion. It was the right decision for me and my husband, and it wasn’t a difficult decision,” Richards writes. “Before becoming president of Planned Parenthood eight years ago, I hadn’t really talked about it beyond family and close friends. But I’m here to say, when politicians argue and shout about abortion, they’re talking about me — and millions of other women around the country.”

Richards doesn’t provide the details surrounding her abortion — how old the baby was at the time of the abortion or why she ended her baby’s life rather than carrying the pregnancy to term or considering adoption.

No, it never fails to flabbergast me, and it always disgusts me how the left values life so little.

Read the full story here.




NJ Medical Board Revokes Late-Term Abortionist Steven Chase Brigham’s License

Steven Chase Brigham in of his mugshots

It’s good to know that some things are beyond the pale even for the ultra-liberals in New Jersey. Steven Chase Brigham fancied himself as a cross between notorious late-term abortionists George Tiller and Kermit Gosnell, and he has the dead babies in his freezer to prove it.

Yesterday his medical license was finally revoked.

The state’s physician disciplinary board tonight revoked the license of Steven C. Brigham, a controversial doctor accused of skirting state rules by starting the process of late-term abortions with five women in his South Jersey office, and ordering them to drive to his Maryland clinic where the procedure was finished.

Finding several counts of gross negligence, deception and official misconduct against him, the state Board of Medical Examiners also ordered Brigham to pay $140,000 in penalties. At a future hearing, the board will decide how much of the state’s court costs he will be ordered to pay; the tab is expected to exceed $500,000.

The board suspended Brigham’s license in 2010 after the Attorney General’s Office argued he used the two-state process to evade New Jersey’s requirement that terminating pregnancies must take place in a hospital or licensed health care facility after 14 weeks. Brigham did not have hospital privileges at the time and is not an obstetrician or a gynecologist.

From his main office in Voorhees, Brigham inserted a device, Laminaria, to expand his patients’ cervixes, and administered a shot of Digoxin to cause “fetal demise.” At his instruction, his patients later drove to drive to a clinic in Elkton, Md. where the fetus would be surgically removed would by another doctor in consultation with Brigham.

Brigham was not licensed to practice medicine in Maryland, but his lawyer said he thought he was following Maryland law that allowed its doctors to consult with out-of-state physicians.

Totally on the up and up, right? Because his shill in Maryland was 87 years old and had never actually performed an abortion. No sane person would let these 2 clowns perform any other surgery, why let them kill babies? Oh, right, emanations of penumbras and stuff.

Brigham’s attorney Joseph Gorrell described his client as a devoted physician who felt compelled to fill the void for late-term abortion services after George Tiller, a family doctor in Kansas, was shot to death in May 2009. Tiller had been the only physician east of Colorado willing to perform late-term abortions in the country.

What a humanitarian!

And if a poor immigrant woman happens to die in the process, hey, abortion is like a feminist sacrament or something and it can’t be restricted no matter what.

So for more than 20 years Steven Chase Brigham botched abortion after abortion, and left a trail of misery in at least 8 states. Because that’s Women’s Health Care!

No one wants to admit it, but Brigham’s operation is far from unique. It’s the norm for how abortionists do business. They’re cold-hearted killers, working in the shadows, because what they do is too hideous to be seen in the light of day. And sadly, far too many “pro-choice” Americans don’t really want to know the gory details of their “choice” anyway. To them it’s all hearts and flowers and rainbows and grrl power. Feminist dogma glosses over the very real and very dead baby whose life isn’t considered worth remembering and besides who are we to intrude on a woman’s right to not be inconvenienced by motherhood?

Yesterday the forces of darkness were dealt a blow. It’s a small victory, but I’ll take it. Meanwhile, pray for the innocent victims of abortion, 55 million souls, consigned to Purgatory through no fault of their own.


Dem Sen. Mark Udall Says He Supports Abortion During the Eighth Month of Pregnancy


Mark Udall

Hat/Tip to WeaselZippers.

The GOP has a ‘War on Women’ and it includes attacking every woman’s right to kill her unborn child…

But don’t worry, it’s still those crazy Republicans who hold extremist views on abortion.

Via Weekly Standard:

At the outset of the Denver Post‘s senatorial debate on Tuesday night, a moderator asked Democratic senator Mark Udall the following question: “We know that you support a woman’s right to choose, but given the advances in scientific understanding of fetal development, where pregnant mothers know at which week babies grow fingernails and can swallow, would you support a ban on late-term abortions and if so at what week?”

Udall replied by citing the case of a woman who discovered during the eighth month of pregnancy that her child had a severe brain deformity. “To demand that that woman carry that child to term would be a form of government intervention that none of us want to see happen. We ought to respect the women of Colorado and their point of view,” Udall said.

Read the full story here.


Supposedly Pro-Life Senator Votes to overtun Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby Ruling

Barack Obama has Joe Manchin's ear, it would seem.
Barack Obama has Joe Manchin’s ear, it would seem.

Hat/Tip to WeaselZippers.

“Pro-life” Senator Votes To Overturn Hobby Lobby Ruling

In 2010, Joe Manchin (D-WV) was elected to the United States Senate. Like all politicians, he promised a lot. Here is an ad he ran for that election cycle.

“I’ll take on Washington, and this administration to get the federal government off of our backs and out of our pockets. I’ll cut federal spending and I’ll repeal the bad parts of ObamaCare.” – Joe Manchin, 2010.

Well evidently not the part where Hobby Lobby is concerned because he voted to overturn the recent Supreme Court ruling that allowed businesses to not be forced to offer or pay for abortifacients as birth control.

So it looks like Senator Manchin is just another far leftist pretending to be a “blue dog Democrat,” who gets his marching orders from some low level flunky in the White House.

Via Townhall

West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin (D) has some explaining to do. Although the senator has proclaimed to be pro-life, his recent support of a Democratic bill to overturn the Supreme Court’s ruling on Hobby Lobby v. Burwell, suggests otherwise. This failed legislation would have reversed a decision that protects the Christian company’s religious freedom and avoid providing employees abortion-inducing drugs.

Manchin explained his support for the bill as such:

“Today, I voted in support of overturning the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision that ruled for-profit companies can opt out of providing contraceptives to their employees because of religious beliefs,” Manchin said. “As Governor and U.S. Senator, I have always fought to protect the sincerely-held religious views of non-profit organizations, like soup kitchens, colleges, hospitals and similar non-profit organizations. However, for-profit corporations do not have the same legal privileges as non-profits, and therefore they should not have the same protections as non-profits recognized by law as being a religious organization. This legislation strikes a balance between allowing non-profit organizations to hold onto their religious views while ensuring that Americans have access to safe, affordable and reliable preventative health benefits.”

I don’t understand how someone who considers himself pro-life can add his name to this bill. The drug ella, one of the four contraceptives Hobby Lobby refused to offer employees, can cause the demise of an embryo already implanted in its mother’s womb, according to the Family Research Council. It should not fall under the term “health benefits.” Clearly, the pro-life movement is overwhelmingly on the side of Hobby Lobby, who is simply trying to avoid violating its religious convictions by offering drugs that could cause abortions.

We’re waiting for an explanation, Mr. Manchin.


Planned Parenthood caught giving award for most abortions



Hat/Tip to WeaselZippers.

Planned Parenthood Gives Worker Award For “Exceeding Abortion Visits”…


Former Planned Parenthood director, Abby Johnson was shocked to see that her employer would have quotas on the number of abortions performed. Yes, the same Planned Parenthood which in the past said it wants abortions to be safe, rare and legal.


Via former Planned Parenthood director Abby Johnson:

Ever since I left Planned Parenthood, I have been talking about the abortion quotas that are established inside abortion facilities.  Many abortion supporters refused to believe it, citing that surely Planned Parenthood wants abortion to be safe, legal and RARE.  If they want something to be RARE, they certainly wouldn’t have quotas, right?

We recently had a clinic worker leave the affiliate, Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains.  This affiliate runs the 2nd largest Planned Parenthood facility in the U.S.  At this clinic in Denver, they give out various awards to their satellite clinics and post these awards on a bulletin board for everyone to see.

When our former worker saw this award on public display, it really started to change her thinking about Planned Parenthood’s motivation.  This award was given to their Aurora clinic for “exceeding abortion visits first half of fiscal year 2012 compared to first half of fiscal year 2013.”

Keep reading…


Kermit Gosnell … One Year Later



It’s been a year since the conviction of Kermit Gosnell. He is the late term abortionist who made millions of dollars murdering new born babies, “providing a service needed by women” as one liberal contended in the comments section of one of my posts last year. I think that Karnamaya Mongar would disagree with that lunacy, but she isn’t available for comment.

Anyway, before I get off into a rant about how the liberal argument and those who put them forth are ignorant beyond belief I’m just going to highlight some of the “services” Mr. Gosnell was providing …

Via: LifeNews.com

1) A young woman who worked at Kermit Gosnell’s abortion clinic as a teenager testified that she saw a baby’s chest move even after the gruesome snipping procedure Gosnell used to end the baby’s life. “The chest was moving,” she testified. The baby was so large that another worker even took a cellphone picture of it. Prosecution experts, based on the picture, say the baby was well past 24 weeks, the legal limit for abortion in Pennsylvania.

2) Another former employee described how she heard a baby scream during a live-birth abortion. “I can’t describe it. It sounded like a little alien,” he testified, telling a judge and Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas jury that the body of the child was about 18 to 24 inches long and was one of the largest babies she had seen delivered during abortion procedures at Gosnell’s clinic.

3) Stephen Massof, who does not have a medical license, described how he jabbed medical scissors into the backs of babies’ necks to kill them. He assisted Gosnell in “snipping” the spinal cords of babies, calling it, “literally a beheading. It is separating the brain from the body.”

4) According to a news report, Massof told the jury that women were often given drugs to speed up delivery of the baby so the abortion/infanticide could take place: He testified that at times, when women were given medicine to speed up their deliveries, “it would rain fetuses. Fetuses and blood all over the place.”

5) One day after a former employee described how she heard a baby scream during a live-birth abortion, another worker at the Kermit Gosnell “House of Horrors’ abortion clinic testified that she saw a baby “jump” when she snipped her neck in an abortion. “It jumped, the arm,” she said, showing the jury by raising her arm.

6) Another Gosnell clinic worker testified that she took photos of one particularly large baby, referred to by prosecutors as “Baby A,” with her cell phone that was estimated to be about 30-weeks gestation. Baby A had been delivered alive into a toilet where she cut the baby’s throat.

7) Baby A was described as being so large that his feet and arms hung out over the sides of the shoebox they put him in. Gosnell actually joked about the baby’s size saying, “This baby is big enough to walk around with me or walk me to the bus stop.”

8) Prosecutors have cited the dozens of jars of severed baby feet as an example of Gosnell’s idiosyncratic and illegal practice of providing abortions for cash to poor women pregnant longer than the 24-week cutoff for legal abortions in Pennsylvania. In her opening statement to the Common Pleas Court jury, Assistant District Attorney Joanne Pescatore mused that the jars of feet were some kind of bizarre “trophy” Gosnell kept.

9) Gosnell’s sister-in-law testified that it was it was part of her cleaning duties to dispose of the large bottle on the suction machine that would fill with blood and fetal remains. She would pour the blood and baby parts into the sink and grind them up using the garbage disposal.

10) It was revealed that on the night patient Karnamaya Mongar died the emergency exit was found to be locked and down a hallway crammed full of broken office furniture and other debris. Workers could not find the key as emergency personnel sought a way to get their Code Blue patient out of the facility and into an ambulance.

If Mr. Gosnell doesn’t find a place of repentance, I hope he burns in the lowest and hottest bowels of hell.

Original Post:  Cry and Howl


Insane Feminist Amanda Marcotte: Compares Babies to Cavities, States They Are ‘Time-Sucking Monsters’


If there is anything positive about the slide of our society into complete degeneracy, it is that the leftists are less inclined to hide their agenda, or the thinking behind it.  Here is what deranged feminist, Amanda Marcotte, has to say about it. 

Lest there be any doubt, Amanda Marcotte really hates pro-lifers. In a two-part rant posted March 14 and 17 on Raw Story, the morally challenged feminist writer attacked pro-lifers as “consummate liars,” “anti-choice kooks” with “boring,” “half-baked nonsense” and “shit arguments.”

But Marcotte’s hate doesn’t stop at pro-lifers. It extends to the babies they want to protect.

“Either way, what she [the woman]wants trumps the non-existent desires of a mindless pre-person that is so small it can be removed in about two minutes during an outpatient procedure. Your cavities fight harder to stay in place.” Did she just compare an unborn child to a cavity?

Marcotte then goes on a seriously mature rant about the reasons she does not want a child: “ I don’t particularly like babies. They are loud and smelly and, above all other things, demanding. No matter how much free day care you throw at women, babies are still time-sucking monsters with their constant neediness.”

On the topic of adoption, Marcotte sums up her feelings simply:  “Adoption? Fuck you, seriously.” That’s a heck of an argument.

Marcotte then argues against forced adoption, “forcing women to donate babies is reprehensible.” Wait, since when did the U.S. have required adoptions?

Abortion is a no-brainer choice for Marcotte: “This is why, if my birth control fails, I am totally having an abortion.” She calls a growing life to “a lentil-sized, brainless embryo that has half a chance of dying on its own anyway.”

At second thought, I owe Amanda Marcotte an apology.  She isn’t insane, or deranged.  she knows exactly what she is doing.

She’s actually evil.