Some Thoughts on #FreeStacy, Twitter, SJW’s, Censorship. and All Around Evil

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

too much to think

I wanted to briefly interrupt my blogging retirement to discuss #FreeStacy, Twitter, and censorship.

Imagine that you go to a restaurant, and the following happens…

  • The chef intentionally under-cooks your food
  • The waiter intentionally doesn’t turn in your order
  • The server announces to all the other patrons that you are a racist
  • The pastry chef posts your address, pictures of your children, and your employers home address on the front door of the establishment
  • The dishwasher creates a fake social media account in your name and posts racist content to it
  • The busboy calls the police and states that you harassed him, even though you’ve never seen him before
  • The owner kicks you our before you get your meal for “abuse,” even though you’ve done nothing but speak about the news of the day.

Now, imagine that you not only pay your bill at this restaurant, but you also return every day for the next round!

Well, if you have a Twitter account, and are a Conservative and/or Christian, you might be experiencing this on an increasing basis. And for some inexplicable reason, you continue to go back.

When I was on Twitter, I followed Stacy McCain.   At no point in time did he target or harass others. However, while Stacy had the absolute nerve to call out people for lying, or stalking others. Or, he was a regular critic of feminism, quoting feminists and giving his take on their ideas. At the same time, SJW’s on Twitter were posting people’s addresses, encouraging others to harass them, and even posting pictures their target’s children. We’ve seen the use of scripts to encourage bans, attempts to target sexual abuse victims and their families, the filing of false claims of harassment, and swamping accounts with fake followers. None of the aforementioned SJW’s were banned for their actions, however, Stacy McCain was.

Now, rather than “boo-hoo” and state that it’s “so unfair,” I’ll say we should expect this. Given the SJW’s totalitarian impulse, and their attraction to evil, we should not be surprised when evil people do evil things. The fact is simple; liars lie, cheaters cheat, stalkers stalk, and then laugh at the misfortune of their victims. They are the “crybullies,” who stalk, harass, and otherwise try to destroy the lives of others. However, when they are confronted with their own words and actions, they quickly claim to be the victim and call down the powers that be upon their target. It is a fairly predictable and easily observed pattern. And, when the playing field is Twitter, should we be surprised when this happens? Of course not, all the parties are acting within their own nature.

The real question is; why do Conservative play their game-on their playground?

The recent changes at Twitter have made a bad situation even worse. It was bad when I was on the platform, and even worse since. Since the formation of their “Ministry of Truth,” Conservatives have been banned, had their blue checkmarks removed, and “shadowbanned.” Their sin? Not being SJWs. Or, even worse, telling the truth about SJW’s.

So then, what is the freedom loving, truth telling segment of the population to do?

Before I answer that, let’s take a look at Twitter’s business model. Twitter sells targeted ads that appear in user’s feed…

Twitter (TWTR) earns 85% or more of its revenue from advertising. In the second quarter of 2014, Twitter posted an advertising base of $277 million, which was more than double the amount of revenue the social media site brought in during the same time in 2013. Twitter uses promoted tweets, promoted accounts and promoted trends. Twitter sells promoted tweets to marketers, and these then appear in users’ Twitter feeds. The company creates tailored advertising opportunities by using an algorithm to make sure promoted tweets make it into the right users’ timelines. 

Twitter makes additional money through data licensing. From the first six months of 2012 to the first six months of 2013, Twitter’s data licensing revenue increased by 53% to $32.2 million. Twitter has named four companies “official data resellers,” and these companies have direct access to all tweets. Each company has developed algorithms for data mining that measure consumer response to everything from brands to movies.

Twitter also made a profit in the last quarter, albeit a small one…

Twitter executives and investors would probably like to forget 2015 on the whole, but things aren’t looking much better for the social media company heading into the new year.

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Gone are the heady days of 2013, when the San Francisco-based company was signing up new users at a brisk pace and was, literally, the talk of the town. Twitter’s share price soared following its initial public offering to more than US$60 on the New York Stock Exchange on expectations that it would become the next Facebook – an online advertising juggernaut with upwards of a billion users.

Two years later, the company has instead stalled at about 300 million users, with anaemic growth punctuating 2015. Twitter added only four million users in its most recent quarter, which helps explain its share price spiral to about $22 to close out the year, well below its IPO debut of $44.90.

The company fired the chief executive, Dick Costolo, in June and replaced him with Jack Dorsey, its founding chief executive who had himself been axed from the job in 2008. Upon his return, in October, Mr Dorsey had the pleasure of overseeing more than 300 layoffs.

Yet Twitter hasn’t been in free fall. The company finally became profitable last year, posting net income of $7 million in its most recent quarter. Revenue garnered from advertisers has also been climbing steadily, to $569m in the third quarter, up 58 per cent compared with a year earlier.

But, it’s growth has stagnated.

When you look at the business model, Twitter’s primary income comes from ads. Looking at this a bit realistically, you see that being able to publish 140 characters for the privilege of being stalked by SJW’s (and later being banned for it) is not actually Twitter’s product. The users themselves are the product! Twitter sells access to its 300 million users to advertisers, who get to present their ads. Also, they allow data mining for all users and Tweets.  Your abuse is just a bonus-you are the product!

In other words, if you are “Tweeting while Conservative,” not only are you being potentially abused in an environment that clearly does not like or want your company, you are actually feeding it.

Twitter is a private company. As such, they can do as they please. However, this also means that no one is obligated to use Twitter. And, in fact, why would you want to contribute to a business that seeks to harm you?   Twitter is making it clear that truth is not wanted there. They don’t want to hear us. They don’t want us there. They already allow regressive users to target and stalk Conservatives, so why go there at all?

My suggestion is clear. Conservatives are not welcome on Twitter. If Twitter wants to be the SJW hugbox of hate, leave them to it. Stacy McCain cannot go back. Adam Baldwin has already left. Milo has been unverified for being too fabulous. Many others have been banned or are leaving. If you want to call their advertisers and state your dissatisfaction, go for it. But leaving Twitter, and then abandoning to the cold hands of the free market is the best move. If they fail, they fail. If they manage to continue, they can be the regressive zoo of the internet. Just like Stacy McCain critiques Tumblr Feminazis, the regressives of Twitter could be a display of child-like, censorious, totalitarian evil, much like a forensic psychiatric ward of the internet.

Or, consider the old Klingon proverb; “Only a fool fights in a burning house.”

By the way, I don’t have a Twitter account. So the only way this gets on Twitter is for someone else to put it there. And, I’m not keeping the comments open on this, as I don’t have time to moderate. I’ll be getting back to my retirement, and studies, so God bless, and stay away from Twitter.

Matt
And for some informative reading, here are some links…

The #FreeStacy Story: Why Was My @rsmccain Account Suspended?

#FreeStacy: ‘A Girl’s Name’

#FreeStacy: @rsmccain ‘Will Not Be Restored’; @SexTroubleBook Suspended

The Hateful Lies of Feminism

 

 

 

Share

What If The World Held A Rally Condemning Radical Islam And The United States Didn’t Show Up?

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Paris Unity Rally_Obama, Biden, Kerry or  Holder DO NOT ATTEND
World Leaders Attend Rally Condemning Radical Islamic Terrorism, US Conspicuously Absent

Hat/Tip to Christine Rousselle at TownHall.com and Nickarama at WeaselZippers.

Remember back in 2006 when he penned these words about Muslims?

“…they need specific reassurances that their citizenship really means something, that America has learned the right lessons from the Japanese internments during World War II, and that I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction. – Barack Obama, from The Audacity of Hope, p. 261.

Yes, he wrote them (well THAT is still up for debate), but none-the-less those are our President’s words.

And yes, he was speaking about feelings towards Muslims in the United States following the 9/11 terror attacks. But one can’t help but wonder if he also feels that way in a broader sense of the word.

It’s not in dispute that Radical Islamic Extremists committed a cowardly, savage terror attack on a French magazine, killing 12 people because of some cartoons. And it’s also not in dispute that the world views this act with the same repulsion and horror that all other atrocities committed in the name of allah are viewed.

So when world leaders decided to give a show of support to the French people, and denounce Radical Islamic Terrorism; who doesn’t show up?

You guessed, the United States of America had NOT ONE high-ranking official there to join in the rally.

So are these similar “political winds” that Obama wrote of? Is this his way of standing with the Muslims – by NOT participating in the Unity Rally in France?

Today, a large “Unity Rally” occurred in Paris to condemn the atrocities that occurred in the city earlier this week. The rally was attended by thousands, including French President Francois Hollande, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, British Prime Minister David Cameron, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. Notably absent? Any major official from the United States, including Attorney General Eric Holder, who was in Paris for a terrorism summit.

The New York Daily News had this to say:

The U.S. did send Attorney General Eric Holder to attend a pre-march terrorism summit convened by French President Francois Hollande.

Holder, 63, joined with Hollande in condemning the recent Paris attacks in the strongest possible terms and said the U.S. will hold another terrorism summit in D.C. in February.

But his support apparently stopped there — because he wasn’t seen at the emotional “Je Suis Charlie” rally afterward that attracted 1.3 million. Across France, nearly 4 million people turned out in similar demonstrations.

As chanting spectators filled the Place de la Republique, the only U.S. dignitary present was the U.S. Ambassador to France Jane Hartley.

Well, maybe President Obama and Vice President Biden were so busy attending to matters of State that they couldn’t get away…

Fine, let’s check. From the White House’s own website, whitehouse.gov, here is President Obama’s schedule for January 11th:

 

obama schedule january 11

 

Having trouble reading that? Well, here is a close-up view of his schedule as posted on the official White House website:

 

obama schedule januray 11 closeup view

 

Well, let’s give Vice President Biden the benefit of the doubt on this, and see what important matters he was tied up with, once again we’ll check with whitehouse.gov for his schedule:

biden schedule january 11

And once again, that’s a bit hard to read, so let’s zoom in:

biden schedule januray 11 closeup view

 

So both of them had open schedules.

Hmmm….

Here’s how the New York Daily News is presenting this whole fiasco…

.

.

That about sums it up…
.
.
.

 

Share

Obama’s Pen Is Mightier Than Any Sword: It’s Filled With An Ink Called Tyranny

Share

It’s not news to anyone who isn’t sleeping 24/7 that President Barack Obama has little regard for the constitution, court orders, or laws of the land. It’s also not news that this president uses Executive Orders (EO) to bypass Congress and do whatever he pleases. Here, however, are two things that may be news to you.

1.White House guts the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) in 2009

Don’t feel bad if you weren’t aware of this. The White House didn’t want to make a big deal out of it. It only came to light when Cause of Action, a watch dog group that monitors government transparency and accountability, got a hold of an April 15, 2009, memo from then-White House Counsel Greg Craig instructing the executive branch to let White House officials review any documents sought by FOIA requestors that involved “White House equities”.

What are “White House equities”? That’s a good question. Mr. Craig did not to define the term and you won’t find the term anywhere in the Freedom Of Information Act. As it turns out, a “White House equity” is anything of interest to the White House, which means all documents requested under FOIA must first go to the White House for review and redacting. Bruce McQuain of Questions and Observations writes:

What this effectively does is stop federal agencies from answering FOIA requests which might include “White House equities” within the 20 days required by law.  There is no apparent limit to the review time the White House can take with its “review” of such requests.  Since the White House gets to decide what are “White House equities” and how long it will take to review requests which include them, the change effectively neuters the intent of the FOIA law.  This gives the White House the ability to delay release of such information until it is politically beneficial for them to do so (or, in reality, not at all):

The Washington Examiner chimes in with this:

The equities exception is breathtaking in its breadth. As the Greg memo put it, any document request is covered, including “congressional committee requests, GAO requests, judicial subpoenas and FOIA requests.”

And it doesn’t matter what format the documents happen to be in because, according to Greg, the equities exception “applies to all documents and records, whether in oral, paper, or electronic form, that relate to communications to and from the White House, including preparations for such communications.”

So much for the Freedom of Information Act. So much for the most transparent administration ever! With the stroke of a White House pen, our rights under FOIA were nullified.

2. Obama usurps  the power of the UN Security Council

I’m serious! How else do you explain the President’s most recent EO placing sanctions on eleven Russian citizens because they may have some how, some way had something to do with the people of Crimea voting to become part of Russia? Did the people of Crimea break some US  law? Did Russian President Putin break some US law for accepting to take in the Crimea? Do the actions of the people of Crimea and Putin pose an  imminent threat to the security of the United States? By what US law did President Obama justify this EO? Aren’t these kinds of sanctions usually authorized by the UN Security Council?

My good friend, 5etester, has a must read post up at his Spellchek blog on this latest Executive Branch overreach. He includes all of the pertinent sections of Mr. Obama’s EO titled  ”Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine”. Please take time to read it. For now let me share with you a couple of excerpts.

Of course, all of this legalese wordsmithing had to come about because our President has no legal authority to seize private property from foreigners. Fact is, you won’t find any language in U.S. law outlining the fact that these 11 random individuals targeted by the Obama Administration are a threat to the interests of the United States and therefore we are justified in seizing their assets. This is important because an EO is supposed to clarify law in order to assist its execution. You can’t clarify what never existed, so in this case you just make it up.

{…}

Utilizing vested authority due to acts of war on our interests abroad could be extrapolated to anyone, anywhere. Same goes with national defense. Our “interests” can literally mean anything. We may view a referendum vote, such as in Crimea, as invalid. Yet these types of votes occur across the globe all the time. North Korea anyone? Venezuela? Cuba? Where are the EO’s condemning those votes? Why aren’t we seizing assets there?

{…}

The longer the Executive Branch goes unchecked, the greater the likelihood they will misuse that power. We’ve already extended the battlefield to include the entire globe. These types of EO’s extend our potential adversary’s to include all Americans as well. Russia may be employing Cold War tactics, but Obama is employing globalist new world order tactics. It is tyrannical.

The Emperor may have no clothes and the world may view President Obama as a wimp, but he has a mighty pen from which tyranny flows. He is but a more polished version of the president of the country where I live.

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. _Ronald Reagan

Well, that’s what I’m thinking. What are your thoughts?

Original Post: Asylum Watch

Share

Virginia Democratic Candidate Proposes the Enslavement of Doctors-Forcing Them to Accept Medicare and Medicaid Patients

Share

If you ask someone that has worked in the medical profession, they would tell you that there is a reason that so many doctors do not accept Medicare and Medicaid patients.

1.  Poor re-reimbursement rates-essentially, you lose money with ever patient.

2.  Increased overhead in the form of more regulation.

3.  (Particularly with Medicaid) Very high no-show rate.  In other words, not only do you lose money with each appointment, but nearly 50% of those appointments are not kept at all, complicating the losses immensely.

4. (Particularly with Medicare) Medicare hired companies to investigate claims and “recover” false claims.  However, by their definition, a false claim is nothing more than an undotted “i,” or an uncrossed “t.”  The mafia outfits that charge seniors for 15 jazzies only get caught due to coincidence.  Oh, and did I mention that these companies get a percentage of the “false claims?”

5.  The Obama administration took hundreds of billions out of Medicare to fund ObamaCare.

6.  The insurance that denies more claims than any other?  Medicare!

In other words, for most doctors, Medicare and Medicaid is a losing proposition.  Mainly because they are government run, and therefore are terrible to deal with.

So, in order to prevent doctors from escaping the “suck,” democratic state delegate candidate, Kathleen Murphy, proposes that the state enslave doctors…

The Mason Conservative reported:

FYI last night at the Great Falls Grange debate, Democrat delegate candidate Kathleen Murphy said that since many doctors are not accepting medicaid and medicare patients, she advocates making it a legal requirement for those people to be accepted.

She did not recognize that the payments are inadequate to cover the doctors’ costs. She also did not recognize there is a shortage of over 45,000 physicians now and that it is forecast to be 90,000 in a few years.

Democrats appear to want to make physicians slaves of the state, but Democrats don’t admit they would just drive more doctors out of practice into retirement and other occupations. The Obamacare law and regulations are causing millions of people to lose their health insurance, drop many doctors and hospitals. The HHS internal forecast is 93 million Americans would lose their health insurance due to the Obamacare law and rules about adequacy of insurance.

Many more people will be uninsured. The penalties for being uninsured start at $95 per year, but the penalties can’t be collected by the IRS if a person does not have a tax refund to attach.
The out of pocket costs required by Obamacare’s Silver Plan for a non-smoking mother and father with two children making a gross before income taxes of $50,000 (roughly average salary for VA) would be $13,765 per year including the deductible of $10,400. That’s 28% of their gross income — not very affordable and about the same as guidelines for a mortgage payment. For such a family making $100,000 of gross income, The cost would be $21,431 including the deductible of $12,700, or 21% of gross income.

In other words, she wants to build a legislative “wall,” took make sure the doctors don’t escape.

Of course, that will just lead a bunch of them to either leave the state, or retire outright.  Of course, the democrats will blame that on someone else.

Share

President Knows-Nothing

Share

He's Mad

Report: Obama Unaware NSA Spied On World Leaders (The Hill)

HHS Chief: President Didn’t Know Of Obamacare Website Woes Beforehand (CNN)

Obama Doesn’t Know Number Of People Who’ve Gotten Insurance Through Exchanges (Politico)

Obama Says He Didn’t ‘Know Anything’ About Probe Into IRS Targeting (Fox News)

Obama Denies Knowing Benghazi Terror-Attack Survivors Have Been Forbidden From Talking To Congress (Mail Online)

Obama: ‘I Didn’t Set a Red Line’ on Syria (Weekly Standard)

Carney: Obama Didn’t Know About Fast & Furious Until He Saw It In Media (Real Clear Politics)

White House: ‘No Knowledge’ Of DOJ Look Into AP Records (Politico)

Obama Claims He Didn’t Know About the Petraeus Investigation (Weekly Standard)

Obama: No Knowledge Of Ayers’ Terrorist Past (NY Post)

On Letterman, Obama Says He Can’t Remember The National Debt (Washington Examiner)

Senior Adviser Robert Gibbs – No ‘Knowledge’ Obama Campaign Pressured Gallup (Washington Times)

Obama Had No Knowledge of Jay-Z + Beyonce’s Cuba Trip (Pop Crush)

Obama Says He Didn’t Know About Minister’s Statements Until Recently (CBS News)

Further exposition is unnecessary.  Barack Obama is either a world class charlatan or the most incompetent buffoon to ever occupy the Oval Office.  Well, maybe he’s both.

Related articles

Original Post:  Be Sure You’re Right, Then Go Ahead

Share

ObamaCare Damage: Nearly Half of NY Doctors Saying ‘Nyet Comrade” to ObamaCare

Share

obamacareexplained

How long before the “so great that you have to be forced to enroll” applies to doctors?  It seems that the doctors out there are not feeling the love for ObamaCare, which means eventually, they’ll have to be punished for it.  Here is the current situation, via Doug Ross…

Ain’t central planning awesome?

New York doctors are treating ObamaCare like the plague, a new survey reveals.

A poll conducted by the New York State Medical Society finds that 44 percent of MDs said they are not participating in the nation’s new health-care plan.

…Only 23 percent of the 409 physicians queried said they’re taking patients who signed up through health exchanges.

“This is so poorly designed that a lot of doctors are afraid to participate,” said Dr. Sam Unterricht, president of the 29,000-member organization. “There’s a lot of resistance. Doctors don’t know what they’re going to get paid.”

…“Obama Care wants to start right away, but who see all these new patients???? Not me,” e-mailed one doc.

Another said, “I plan to retire if this disaster is implemented. This is a train wreck.”

“I refuse to participate in the exchange plans! I am completely opposed to this new law,” said a third respondent.

One doctor recycled the mantra used to attack addictions: “The solution is simple: Just say no.”

Now, instead of listening to doctors, who actually TREAT PATIENTS, the Obama administration will respond as governments do, they will eventually use force, citing the crisis of their own creation as the rationale.  Of course, ObamaCare really isn’t about treating patients-it’s about control.

 

Share

Insurance Industry Threatened With ‘Retribution’ if They Talk About ObamaCare Problems, Including People Not Keeping Plans

Share

ObamaCare is causing a ton of problems.  Unless you’re under a rock, or watch MSNBC for your daily dose of Kool Aid, you know that.  But, the government doesn’t want you to know, and they’re trying to make people stop talking about it.  Today’s target is the insurance industry, who is being forced to cancel people’s plans because they are no longer compliant with ObamaCare’s myriad of regulations.  Believe it or not CNN has more…

Are even the lefties in the MSM giving the Obama administration some payback for being rough with them on message control?  Who knows, but these random acts of journalism are becoming less random.

Don’t worry, I’m not getting my hopes up.

On a side note, the insurance industry has been dealing with government for decades, and as the report notes, they do a ton of business with government funded plans.  Did they really think they could do that forever without being “bit?”  Government is force; if you play with fire,eventually, you’re going to g3et burned.  Big insurance is learning this now.  And, if the MSM keeps on telling the truth, they’re in for a smack too.

H/T:  Weasel Zippers

Share

Dems: “The Gulag For Thee, But Not For Me”

Share

Hope and Derange

“I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you’re not patriotic, and we should stand up and say, ‘We are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration!’” – Hillary Clinton

Times have changed since Shrillary’s anti-Bush tirade in 2003. The Democrats won. Disagreement with their administration will now identify you as a ‘domestic enemy’ and probably cause you to be placed under NSA surveillance.

“Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out.”

The motto of David Horowitz’s Front Page Magazine has never been more evident than in the wake of the recent ‘shutdown’ of the federal government.  From Poughkeepsie to Portland, apoplectic Stalinists … er, progressives … are clamoring for  the incarceration (or worse) of anyone with the temerity to oppose Barack Obama’s ongoing sovietization of their former country.  Much of this venom is being aimed at Ted Cruz, a Republican so depraved that he actually believes in the Constitution of the United States, an antiquated document that incites the holy wrath of both Redbirds and RINOs:

The man under FBI investigation for making violent threats against Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz was inspired to encourage violence by Democratic Party messaging efforts. (Daily Caller)

____________________

 • Democrats are openly calling for the arrest of Sen. Ted Cruz “for sedition”. Never mind the Constitution explicitly grants the power of the purse to Congress, not the President. Never mind that James Madison himself described that the House could, in fact, shut down any program it wanted to. Never mind all that: the Constitution doesn’t matter to these hard left sixties retreads. They don’t want any political opposition. They want you gone. They want you silent, or in prison, or dead (what do you think Obamacare is really about?).

 • MSNBC plainly calls lawful dissent “sedition”, presumably punishable by death.

 • Democrat Congressman Steve Cohen (TN) labels conservatives “domestic enemies”, alluding to presidential actions to secure the country from the Tea Party, veterans, and Constitutional conservatives.

 • A public MoveOn.org petition calls for the arrests of Republicans in Congress by the Holder DOJ.(Doug Ross @ Journal)

____________________

Ted Cruz has recently … well you know what he’s been up to recently. Former Massachusetts. Governor and Republican establishment stalwart John Sununu, on the other hand, has recently been busy on Capitol Hill lobbying on behalf of the business interests of Castro’s Cuba, an official “State-Sponsor of Terrorism.” So which Republican is taking all the heat—and from the Republican establishment?(Townhall)

Let’s start calling it like it is: “Progressive” is the polite term that communists use to describe themselves.  And whenever and wherever they have gained power, they have filled countless jails and graveyards with their political opponents — 149 and a half million of them worldwide, by one estimate.  Ted Cruz is on their list.  And if you’re reading this, so are you.

PTG

Original Post: Be Sure You’re Right, Then Go Ahead

Share

Liberals Stating That Dissent it Sedition: Calls For the Arrest of Those That Disagree With Totalitarianism

Share

Nazi Germany, Soviet Union, ChiComs, Chavez’s Venezuala, Cuba, Vietnam, to name a few, all had something in common; punishing dissent.

History is filled with regimes that made dissent a crime.  Prisons, concentration camps, gulags, and even psychiatric facilities were filled with people that simply disagreed with the ruling regime.  In fact, it still goes on today.  The reasoning is rather simple.  When the regime is based on socialism, it fails-and to cover up that failure, opponents must be blamed, and punished.  Then, when the opponents are jailed (or killed outright), the failure continues, and other people are then blamed for the ongoing failure.  After all, it has to be someone else’s fault! Any effort to point out the failure, let alone do something to change or prevent the failure, is branded as treason, or sedition.  In other words, to a liberal, you telling the truth is a crime.  Doing your job, and trying to fix the problem amounts to sedition.

Doug Ross (no relation) has quotes from liberal sources that indicate that is some had their way, a lot of us would be sent to some “camps.”

If Democrats regain control of the House, rest assured that your Second Amendment rights will be eviscerated as they very nearly did following the mass shooting by the lunatic in Sandy Hook. Dianne Feinstein — the loathsome and brazen crook from California — had her gun ban bill in place, just waiting for a nice, bloody tragedy to exploit.

These are some truly frightening portents.

Democrats are openly calling for the arrest of Sen. Ted Cruz “for sedition”. Never mind the Constitution explicitly grants the power of the purse to Congress, not the President. Never mind that James Madison himself described that the House could, in fact, shut down any program it wanted to. Never mind all that: the Constitution doesn’t matter to these hard left sixties retreads. They don’t want any political opposition. They want you gone. They want you silent, or in prison, or dead (what do you think Obamacare is really about?).

MSNBC plainly calls lawful dissent “sedition”, presumably punishable by death.

Democrat Congressman Steve Cohen (TN) labels conservatives “domestic enemies”, alluding to presidential actions to secure the country from the Tea Party, veterans, and Constitutional conservatives.

A public MoveOn.org petition calls for the arrests of Republicans in Congress by the Holder DOJ.

These are some dangerous times, my friends.

Larry Jackson, from Political Realities, has some rather insightful commentary…

The first thing that comes to mind is Hillary Clinton and her famous diatribe against George W. Bush.

I’m sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and disagree with this administration, somehow you’re not patriotic. We need to stand up and say we’re Americans, and we have the right to debate and disagree with any administration.

Funny thing, this debate and disagreement stuff. It applies to every administration, no matter if the man in the White House is Democrat or Republican. That right is guaranteed us by the United States Constitution, but you can’t tell it by listening to the liberals. The rhetoric and tactics in which they engage should serve as a warning to the rest of us. They have no qualms about attacking someone who disagrees with them, aka Brett Kimberlin. If it doesn’t make you wonder exactly what they are capable of, ie. what they are willing to do to further their agenda, then you might as well stop reading now.

Larry hits it right on the nose.  We have to wonder how far they are will to go, and what measures they are will to tale to reach their goals.  History is a very uncompromising teacher, and it shows, very clearly, that when people or groups state vile intentions, they most often try to follow through on them.  It is up to us, as students of history, to point out these intention, lest people be surprised when they come to fruition.

Make no mistake.  The only thing that separates our regressives from the Nazis and Bolsheviks is the speed at which they operate.  Our regressives have worked for decades at ruining our moral and economic systems.  Rather than a bloody coup de main, they have resorted to a slow process of subversion.  They have met success.  But even though they have operated for decades, violence will still have to be part of their final seizure of power.  then, once their seizure of power  is complete, and their system fails, more violence will be necessary to maintain it.  Any totalitarian system must suppress it’s population.  The regressives will. therefore. follow their fellow travelers.

I know, I don’t pain a pretty picture, but if we shy away, stay silent, and disengage, the bad guys will win, and we will be the first to the wall.


Share

Americans Storm Lincoln Memorial Park Police Mass To Remove Then

Share

It seems that in this government shutdown, the Park Police some how has the money to have more police to keep people out than they ever had to let them in.  Funny, isn’t it?  Well, some Americans decided to ignore the democrat shutdown by going over, or through, the “barrycades” around the Lincoln Memorial. Here is some news footage…

It is said that the Park Service amassed a “small army,” and ran off the intruders.  That, of course, begs the question, if the have that many park police on duty, why aren’t the monuments open in the first place?

The answer is obvious.  Barak Obama is a petulant narcissist who is unworthy of his office, and is a laughing stock all over the planet.

H/T: Weasel Zippers

 

 

Share

Christine O’Donnell’s Tax Information Allegedly Leaked to Deleware State Goverment the Day She Declared: No Penalities for Violating Law

Share

Once you start looking at the overall pattern, you see that Obama administration must think that they can do whatever they want.

MORE ANTI-TEA-PARTY ACTIVITY: IRS Admits It Leaked Christine O’Donnell’s Tax Records To Opposition Day She Announced:

On March 9, 2010, the day she revealed her plan to run for the Senate in a press release, a tax lien was placed on a house purported to be hers and publicized. The problem was she no longer owned the house. The IRS eventually blamed the lien on a computer glitch and withdrew it.

Now Mr. Martel, a criminal investigator for the Treasury Department’s inspector general for tax administration, was telling her that an official in Delaware state government had improperly accessed her records on that very same day.

Beyond that, Ms. O’Donnell and Senate investigators who have tried to help her have run into a wall of silence, leaving more questions than answers about whether abuses of the IRS system extend to private individuals and not just the tax-exempt groups already identified as victims.

I will take the opportunity to remind everyone that this was supposed to be the “most transparent administration ever.”  In actual practice, they have they have consistently abused government power for political ends, and instead of being  being transparent, they have pursued whistle blowers, and stonewalled requests for information.  They have used private, or secret, email addresses in order to evade oversight.   In other words, they used transparency as a motto, but in reality, they act like a police state.

Share

Facsist Friday: Missouri Democrat, Jeff Roorda,Wants to tell Businesses When They can Open

Share

fascist friday

When a Democrat doesn’t like something, they either try to ban it, or they make it impossible to do without banning it.  In this case, they are going with the direct ban.  It seems that a Missouri Democrat, Jeff Roorda, wants to tell businesses when they can start their Black Friday sales.  The Missouri Torch has the details…


Sorry, you’re too stupid to decide whether or not you should go shopping or not, so this great regressive democrat will decide for you.

Share

Fascist Friday: Eleven Year old Earns Suspension for Talking About Gun

Share

fascist friday

That’s right, all a child needed to do was to mention a gun, and he earned a ten day suspension.  Here is the story, from WMAL…

OWINGS, MD — The father of a middle schooler in Calvert County, Md. says his 11-year-old son was suspended for 10 days for merely talking about guns on the bus ride home.

Bruce Henkelman of Huntingtown says his son, a sixth grader at Northern Middle School in Owings, was talking with friends about the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre when the bus driver hauled him back to school to be questioned by the principal, Darrel Prioleau.

“The principal told me that with what happened at Sandy Hook if you say the word ‘gun’ in my school you are going to get suspended for 10 days,” Henkelman said in an interview with WMAL.com.

So what did the boy say?  According to his father, he neither threatened nor bullied anyone.

“He said, I wish I had a gun to protect everyone. He wanted to defeat the bad guys. That’s the context of what he said,” Henkelman said. “He wanted to be the hero.”

The boy was questioned by the principal and a sheriff’s deputy, who also wanted to search the family home without a warrant, Henkelman said. “He started asking me questions about if I have firearms, and [the deputy said] he’s going to have to search my house.  Search my house?  I just wanted to know what happened.”

No search was performed, and the deputy left Henkelman’s home after the father answered questions in a four-page questionnaire issued by the Sheriff’s Office.

So, the kid mentioned guns in the context of protecting others, and he gets suspended?  And, how is it that law enforcement can demand to search a home without probable cause or a warrant?   This is a prime example of knee-jerk reactionary nonsense.  Emotional thinking leads to stupid decisions, and this is a prime example.

H/T: Protein Wisdom

Share

According the DHS and CIAC, We Christians are Taking God and the Bible “too Seriously”

Share

And, the war on Christians continues to ramp up.  The Clash Daily has printed a letter from a Colorado law enforcement officer, who claims to have attended a training provided by CIAC, which is a “fusion center.”  These centers exchange information between state and local law enforcement agencies, and DHS.  We looked at how these centers work back in 2009, when the infamous DHS report was preceded by the equally offenseive MIAC report.  Here is the letter…

From: rtrowbridge@prowerscounty.net To: forknown@hotmail.com Subject: CSP Training Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 10:30:22 -0600

On April 1, 2013 I attended training in La Junta, Colorado hosted by the Colorado State Patrol (CSP).  The training was from 12:00 pm to 4:00 pm and covered two topics, Sovereign Citizens, and Outlaw Motorcycle Gangs.  I was pretty familiar with motorcycle gangs but since we often deal with the so-called sovereign citizen groups I was interested to see what they had to say.  The group consisted of police officers, deputies, and CSP troopers.  There were about 20 people in attendance.

Trooper Joe Kluczynski taught a 2-hour section on sovereign citizens.  Kluczynski spent most of his two hours focusing on how, in his view and apparently the view of Homeland Security, people turn to the sovereign citizen movement.  Kluczynski started off by saying there are probably some sovereign citizens in this room and gave a generalized list of those groups that have sovereign citizen views.  Among those groups, Kluczynski had listed, were those who believe America was founded on godly principles, Christians who take the Bible literally, and “fundamentalists”.  Kluczynski did not explain what he meant by “fundamentalists” but from the context it was clear he was referring again to those who took the Bible literally or “too seriously.”

While Kluczynski emphasized that sovereign citizens have a right to their beliefs, he was clearly teaching that the groups he had listed should be watched by law enforcement and should be treated with caution because of their potential to assault law enforcement.  Kluczynski explained why he believed these groups were dangerous saying they were angry over the election of a black president.  When someone in the group suggested the failing economy was probably much more to blame, Kluczynski intimated that those who are not going along with the changes in America will need to be controlled by law enforcement.  Kluczynski even later questioned some of the troopers present if they were willing and prepared to confiscate “illegal” weapons if ordered to.

Kluczynski’s assignment with the CSP was an Analyst for the Colorado Information Analysis Center, (CIAC).  CIAC is funded by Homeland Security funds and run by the CSP.  Kluczynski said he gets his information from the Department of Homeland Security.  Kluczynski said he was leaving the CSP at the end of that week (March 29, 2013) to begin his new career with Homeland Security.  I thought he was perfect for the job.

Ron Trowbridge
Undersheriff
Prowers County Sheriff’s Office

The linked article at the Clash Daily, linked above, has much more information, and I recommend you check it out.

So, this shows all the hallmarks of the last report.  There are targets to be smeared.  The smear is to link normal patriotic Americans with hate groups, racists, and extremists.  Then, when the time comes to round up the enemies of the state, authorities are properly and sufficiently propagandised to ignore the truth and follow orders.  Then again, planting the seed in law enforcement’s heads that Christians might be interested in assaulting them might make officers want to “shoot first and ask questions later.” At least that’s the idea.  Our leftists tend to underestimate the strength and determination of real people, so many will remain solidly on the side of law.  Hopefully there will be enough.

And, as I predicted in 2009, how long will it take before DHS is echoing the CIAC  training materials?

Share

Pro-Choice Woman Destroys Pro-Life Signs, Slips and Reveals Genocidal Agenda

Share

Regressives are slipping more and more as of late.  Perhaps with Obama in charge, and having won re-election, they figure it doesn’t matter what they say or do, because the MSM will never cover it. Or, maybe its that they’ve lived and studied in the unreality bubble for so long that they think everyone agrees with them.  Or, maybe they’re  just elitist a**holes that think they smarter than the rest of us us cretins.  I’ll go with the third option, by the way, but here is a short video showing the latest slip regarding a genocidal agenda.

Now, if someone at a Tea Party event did that, it would be front page news, and basis for claims 0f racism.  But, for a regressive to call for the death of people that are born addicted to a drug that their parent ingested, or just because they are poor?  Well, that’s OK.  Remember this?

Yes, the young lady in the first video has taken the regressive blood-lust, and made it a bit more sophisticated, and a hell of a lot cheaper.   You see, you don’t need camps with a “humane gas,” you just kill the “undesirables” before they are born.

And just to remind all of you, the vast majority of Planned Parenthood facilities are located in minority neighborhoods.  But let’s not let the genocidal agenda get out, mmkay?

Planned Parenthood

Just saying.

H/T: Right Scoop


You can support the work of the CH 2.0 with your Amazon purchases, at no expense to yourself!

Share

Two Christians Were Beheaded by Muslim: National Media Silent

Share

If seems that  more and more good people  are being set upon by all sides.   Christians are being persecuted in schools, in universities, in hospitals, and via ObamaCare.  Now, add to the fray the Muslims, for  two Christians were beheaded by a Muslim in New Jersey.  And, as usual, the MSM is taking a pass on covering it.  The Western Center for Journalism has the video…

Then again, the Book tells us that this sort of thing is going to happen.  But the MSM is performing its function and not reporting on it.  However, if a Tea Party member were caught jaywalking, it would be a national story.  In fact, maybe NBC will just make it up and report it!

Linked by America’s Watchtower, Thanks!

 

Share

Hitler was a Socialist, by his own Admission

Share

Doug Ross has found yet another example of how Adolph Hitler was a socialist, and this time, in his own words…

Daniel Hannan cuts through the disinformation routinely spewed by the pundit class to reveal the true historical nature of fascism, albeit as it pertains to British politics. The lessons, however, are applicable here as well.

I am a Socialist,’ Hitler told Otto Strasser in 1930, ‘and a very different kind of Socialist from your rich friend, Count Reventlow’.

No one at the time would have regarded it as a controversial statement. The Nazis could hardly have been more open in their socialism, describing themselves with the same terminology as our own SWP: National Socialist German Workers’ Party.

Almost everyone in those days accepted that fascism had emerged from the revolutionary Left. Its militants marched on May Day under red flags. Its leaders stood for collectivism, state control of industry, high tariffs, workers’ councils. Around Europe, fascists were convinced that, as Hitler told an enthusiastic Mussolini in 1934, ‘capitalism has run its course’.

Doug (no relation) has even more.  The main point is this-to detach from the genocide of the holocaust, leftists have not only disowned the fascists (and especially the Nazis) they have gone to the trouble of pinning them to the right.  Of course it’s a complete lie, and that’s why the left defends it so savagely.  Anyone that points out the truth is attacked in massive fashion.  It’s like the drunk that doesn’t want to be confronted with that they did on their last bender.  They have no desire to be confronted with their past, even though it’s closely related to their present (abortion, and especially Planned Parenthood’s ongoing “negro project”), and their proposed future (population control).   But, as always, the truth ends up being a rather stubborn thing.

Share