Oklahoma Senate Passes Unborn Child Protection From Dismemberment Abortion Act

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

 photo life is beautiful_zpsnbcfeuni.jpg

Hat/Tip to Christine Rousselle at TownHall.com.

What a sad commentary that we even need a law like this…

Oklahoma is about to join Kansas and become the second state to pass a bill banning the dilation and evacuation (D&E) abortion technique. The Oklahoma Senate voted yesterday on the Unborn Child Protection from Dismemberment Abortion Act as well as a bill that required a 72-hour waiting period for an abortion.

D&E abortions are performed in the second trimester of pregnancy, when the fetus is between the age of 12 and 24 weeks. It consists of removing pieces of the fetus with forceps.

But abortion is supposed to be quick and painless…

It is expected that Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin (R) will sign the bills. Oklahoma previously had a 24-hour waiting period before an abortion could be performed.

South Carolina and Missouri are also considering bills to ban D&E abortions in their states.


.

.

.

Share

Left Pushing To Replace Andrew Jackson On $20 Bill With Baby Killer And Genocidal Enviro-Statist

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

stanton-elizabeth-cady

 

Hat/Tip to Warner Todd Huston at Publius’ Forum.

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Hell bring the $2 bill back and put someone with female genitalia on that…

There is a new campaign afoot that is tickling the interests of the mainstream media. It is an effort to kick President Andrew Jackson off the $20 bill and replace him with a woman. Sadly at least three of the candidates do not belong on the list. One is a famous hater of men, another can only be termed a mass murderer, and the third was an important supporter of the genocide of African Americans. How is it these three women deserve to be celebrated on the $20 bill is anyone’s guess.

The campaign called Women On The 20, is, the group says on its website, is an effort to “compel historic change by convincing President Obama that NOW is the time to put a woman’s face on our paper currency.”

The group hopes to have the change on the money made by the year 2020, which happens to be the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment, the one that gave women the right to vote.

One of the ways that proponents of the new face on the 20 hopes to achieve their goal is to have Americans sign a petition that would “force” Obama to take notice and make a decision on the proposal.

So, Iran is close to getting nukes, ISIS is damn near committing genocide, Putin is building up Russia’s military, as is Red China and these folks think THIS is what our President needs to be focused on??!!

The group has also proffered a list of 15 candidates from which website visitors may chose their top three. The list of candidates, though is in many cases little else but a cavalcade of leftists some of whom celebrated things that should disqualify them as the sort of Americans whom people should respect.

Here is the full list:

  • Alice Paul (1885-1977): Woman’s suffragette
  • Betty Friedan (1921-2006): Radical feminist
  • Shirley Chisholm (1924-2005): Politician
  • Sojourner Truth (1797-1883): Former slave and abolitionist
  • Rachel Carson (1907-1964): Environmentalist
  • Rosa Parks (1913-2005): Civil rights activist
  • Barbara Jordan (1936-1996): Politician
  • Margaret Sanger (1879-1966): Eugenecist
  • Patsy Mink (1927-2002): Politician
  • Clara Barton (1821-1912): Founder of the American Cross
  • Harriet Tubman (1822-1913): Former slave and abolitionist
  • Frances Perkins (1880-1965): FDR’s Labor Secretary
  • Susan B. Anthony (1820-1906): Abolitionist and women’s sufferage leader
  • Eleanor Roosevelt (1884-1962): First Lady and human rights activist
  • Elizabeth Cady Stanton (1815)-1902): Women’s rights leader

Now, most of these candidates are personages worthy of being included in a list of candidates for famous American women. But three of the candidates are not famous, but are infamous and do not belong on this list of worthies.

Namely, Betty Friedan, Margaret Sanger, and Rachel Carson.

Rachel Carson is famed as the author of the thinly researched and now thoroughly debunked envirowacko book Silent Spring. Carson’s faux “work” led to the banning of the insecticide DDT. Carson claimed it was a carcinogen and an environmentally disastrous. The the facts are that DDT helped kill mosquitos and save the lives of billions who otherwise would have died from malaria. Since its banning tens of millions have kept dying, most of them in underdeveloped nations. Rachel Carson is guilty of mass murder for her lies.

Next up is the unworthy Margaret Sanger. She is famed for coining the term “birth control” and is an icon for lovers of infanticide everywhere. But one of the dirty little secrets that the pro-abortion lobby refuses to accept is the fact that she worked in her chose field of eugenics in order to cleanse America of the black race. Sanger was little else but an advocate of the genocide of blacks in America.Sanger wanted to use abortion and sterilization to cull from the population a list of “undesirables” that mirrors the list the Nazis used to purify Germany. She wanted, for instance, to eliminate the mentally retarded and blacks from the gene pool of the country.Sanger was a disgusting, murder-supporting eugenicist that should be reviled.

Lastly is Betty Friedan, one of the founders of the women’s rights movement, wrote the famed book The Feminine Mystiquein 1963, a book that sparked a massive movement for women’s rights. But ultimately Friedan proved to be merely a man hater, some charge a racist, but most certainly a major liar.

Read the full story here.

.

.

.

Share

Feminist Admits Aborting Baby Because He Was a Boy: States She Didn’t Want to Bring Another “Monster Into the World”

Share

When we say that feminism isn’t based on equality, but on hate, we are ridiculed.  The following shows why we are correct, via Weasel Zippers…

Via Pundit Press

In a stunningly evil and disgusting article, a feminist only willing to identify herself as “Lana” has described her decision to abort her child, based solely on the fact that he was a boy.

Lana begins her article by explaining that “the patriarchy has been well entrenched since the dawn of time,” and continues by writing about an argument she had with a man on an airplane, while she was pregnant, to summarize what she deemed “extreme patriarchy.”

The description of the argument is straight forward: Lana was flying to San Francisco to participate in an Occupy Wall Street rally. When the person sitting next to her found out about it, he swore at her, to which Lana responded by screaming at the top of her lungs “ASSAULT.”

After “contemplating” lying to the flight attendants and telling them that the man struck her, Lana decided to tell the truth. The flight attendants told her that they couldn’t force the man to move in response. And in response to that, Lana decided that she “could no longer depend on men to be an ally of the cause.”

The “cause,” in her mind, is feminism. Soon after, she went to the doctor and was told that she was pregnant with a boy. Her immediate response, she writes, was “my body had betrayed me even worse than the misogynistic suit jockey on the airplane so many months before. I was in shock, I started crying, weeping at the thought of what I was about to curse the world with.”

Over the course of several days, she decided that she could not bring another male into this world. She explains, “I couldn’t bring another monster into the world. We already have enough enemies as it is.”

While I think this is pretty typical for feminists, and it don’t think it need to expound on it,  Feminism was never about equality-it has always been about hate.  If anyone out there doubts that, I fear that there is little I can do for you.

I would really like to point out the section in which she was “contemplating” lying to the flight attendants.  This is typical liberal behavior.  How many fake hate crimes have been exposed?  Remember the false rape claims repeated by Rolling Stone?  Or what of the “Mattress Girl?”  Or what of, “if you like your plan. you can keep it.”  Or, for that matter, that the Earth is hotter every year?   I could write a book chronicling liberal lies.   The point is simple; whether you call is progressivism, liberalism,   communism, fascism, or any of the other titles, their beliefs and policies are all based on lies.  And, when they logical results of those policies come to light, they lie about those too.

Then again, they are following the father of lies, so I guess we shouldn’t be surprised.

Share

Pro-Abortion Activists Steal Signs from Students

Share

In their ongoing effort to always “keep it classy,” an apparent pro-abortion supporter decided that no other opinion than his own is permitted, and took the normal liberal action…

On February 4, 2015, Created Equal’s young pro-life demonstrators were attacked outside Beechcroft High School. Video of the incident reveals a homeowner crossing the street to berate the activists before stealing, destroying their signs.

The homeowner crossed the street to the public sidewalk outside the school where Created Equal had set up. He shouted, “Get ‘em out of here or I am going to break ‘em.” He proceeded to knock over and steal signs, wrenching them out of the hands of Jami Beer, Created Equal’s Director of Campus Outreach.

A police report was filed, and Created Equal is pressing charges.

“In a culture killing its children, unfortunately sometimes abortion advocates act violently against those who defend the children. Nevertheless, we refuse to be intimidated into silence.”—Mark Harrington, Executive Director, Created Equal

Mr. Harrington nailed it.  If they are willing to support the killing of babies, there isn’t a whole lot left off the table in terms of actions against those that resist the killing of said babies.

Share

GOP Runs Scared, Pulls Bill Banning 20 Week Abortion

Share

Abortion Kills

If there is one thing I have run out of, it is patience with the GOP. This started after the abysmal showing in the Presidential election of 2012. Since that time, we have seen a continual slide towards the acceptance of amnesty for illegal immigrants. That, along with other pandering, was aimed at Hispanic voters. The GOP seemed set on the idea that 2012 was lost because of alienation of Hispanics. Never mind that so many conservatives stayed home because they didn’t want to vote for Mitt Romney. This shows a complete lack of conviction on the part of the GOP leadership and a lack of nerve to follow whatever convictions they may happen to have. That lack of conviction has again been placed on display for everyone to see.

For two years, certain members of the GOP have been working on a bill that would criminalize virtually every abortion performed after 20 weeks, with some exceptions for rape or incest. It appeared to be headed towards certain passage in the House of Representatives, until last week. That’s when grumblings started to surface. Some members of the GOP were afraid passing the bill would alienate women voters.

Fox News – The failed bill, which reflected the idea that a fetus can feel pain at 20 weeks, would have criminalized virtually all abortions for pregnancies of 20 weeks or longer. It would offer some exceptions, including for victims of rape that have already been reported to authorities.

But some Republicans, including female members of Congress, objected to that requirement, saying that many women feel too distressed to report rapes and should not be penalized. A 2013 Justice Department report calculated that just 35 percent of rapes and sexual assaults were reported to police.

The issue becomes, we’re questioning the woman’s word,” Rep. Renee Ellmers, R-N.C., said earlier Wednesday. “We have to be compassionate to women when they’re in a crisis situation.”

There were also objections to the bill’s exemption for minors who are victims of incest and have reported the incident.

“So the exception would apply to a 16-year-old but not a 19-year-old?” said Rep. Charles Dent, R-Pa. “I mean, incest is incest.”

There was concern that the bill would have looked bad for the Republican Party as it struggles to court female voters in the 2016 presidential and congressional elections, and primary and general election candidates could have turned the vote around on the Republicans. The GOP also wants to demonstrate that it can focus on issues that matter to voters and not get bogged down in gridlock.

Abortions performed after 20 weeks are considered to be late-term abortions. The unborn infant is able to feel pain and can react to stimuli from outside the womb. Even the most hardened of hearts should be able to see what a travesty abortion really is, especially after 20 weeks. It’s not about a woman’s choice to kill her unborn child, but rather about giving that child the opportunity to be born and live its life. It is about protecting the lives of our most vulnerable of God’s creation. Instead of doing that, the GOP is running scared of how it may affect the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election. To that, I would like an answer to this question. What good is winning the White House if our party is unwilling to take a stand and prevent as many murders of unborn children as possible?

I understand that this bill had little chance of becoming law, due to a sure veto by President Obama. He will certainly refuse to sign any legislation that contains anything that remotely resembles a restriction on abortion. But, iss something like this not worth taking a stand for? If not, then when do we stop backtracking on everything we believe in and start taking that stand? Do we need to allow abortion all the way until the pregnancy is full term, lest we alienate women voters? Please understand, I am not against women’s rights. I am not against them obtaining health care or any other service they need. This is not about that, or their right to privacy. It is about protecting as many unborn children as possible.

David Harsanyi points out that the placing limits on abortion has a broad support across a variety of different polls. And he isn’t not nearly as tactful as I am about pointing out how the GOP has failed by pulling the bill.

Human Events – Evidently, Republicans don’t feel competent enough to make a case against infanticide. Why else would the GOP pull its 20-week abortion limit bill?

Here’s a short list of things that are less popular than banning late-term abortions: “Acting” on climate change. “Free” community college. Taxing the wealthy. Building the Keystone XL pipeline. President Barack Obama. Future President Hillary Clinton. Every Republican who’s thinking about running for president.

A new Marist poll finds that 84 percent of Americans favor some level of further restrictions on abortion. And regardless of their feelings about the legality of the procedure, 60 percent believe it to be “morally wrong.” If you aren’t keen on that poll — it was sponsored by the Knights of Columbus, after all — you can take your pick of others.

A Quinnipiac poll found that 60 percent of women support limiting abortions to the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. A CBS News poll found that 60 percent of Americans think abortion “should not be permitted” or available only under “stricter limits.” A CNN poll found that 58 percent of Americans believe abortion should be legal only in a “few circumstances” or “always illegal.”

Yet the GOP caves on a bill that would prohibit most abortions after 20 weeks and promises instead to pass another worthless ban on taxpayer-funded abortions — which we all know can be ignored by hiring an accountant.

Polls change. Polls don’t make you right. I know. But this week marks the 42nd anniversary of Roe v. Wade. And while the media continue to treat every Obama non-starter and crowd-pleaser as a genuine policy idea, the 20-week abortion ban was predictably framed as another divisive play by zealous conservatives. Controversial. Republican leaders helpfully confirmed this perception by abandoning the only bill their party has come up with in years that has been widely supported.

David Harsanyi is right. Polls do not necessarily may a position right or wrong, but it is clear how much support placing limits on abortion has in America. You should read the rest of his post on Human Events. It is worth taking your time to read and he is very frank about his disappointment at what has happened.

Of course, the media was already loading their guns for when the bill was passed by the GOP. They were ready and willing to paint anyone who voted for this bill as a hater of women and any other inaccurate term they could coin. It is possible this played a role in decision by the GOP to pull the bill from consideration. It is worth noting that the Democrats tried to do this with the 2014 election. They tried every tactic in the book to describe the GOP as haters of women. As you can see from the result, that didn’t work out so well for them.

What amazes me is how turncoat some Republicans have been on this issue. Again, from Human Events.

A big part of that attack was focused on abortion. It stopped working. So someone needs to inform House Republicans of this. Because the most mystifying aspect of the GOP’s retreat on the 20-week ban is that the 20-week ban is not new. Most of these same Republicans voted on the same legislation before the midterm elections, including some of the same representatives who reportedly withdrew their support for the bill. Nearly every GOP candidate running in the midterms publicly backed the idea, even in high-profile races in which Democrats made abortion the central issue of their campaign.

Why support the bill during the election, or at least the idea of the bill, and then, after you have won your election, turn your back on it? It just makes no sense to me, especially when it is clear that most Americans support the measure. The only answer I can come up with is the same one put forth by David Harsanyi.

This is about politics. Tragically incompetent politics. Even though a veto was imminent, you have to wonder: If the party representing the pro-life position, a party with a sizable majority, can’t pull together a vote on an issue as unambiguous and risk-free as this one, what are the chances of it coming to a consensus and offering compelling arguments on issues such as health care and tax reform? Very little, I imagine.

How true that paragraph is. President Obama is well known for his stance on abortion. He wants women to have 24-7 access to abortion, all the way to the end of the pregnancy. No restrictions, lest we infringe upon their right to choose. If the GOP is unable to articulate an argument against such freely available abortion and for placing limits on this barbaric practice, especially when so many Americans want that to happen, then I have to wonder what good are they actually doing in Washington.

.

.

Share

57,762,169

Share

 photo ABORTION-TERMINATES_zpsb95f2306.jpg
 

Imagine a world where 57,762,169 unborn children weren’t sacrificed on the altar of feminism. Imagine a world where the charnal houses of Planned Parenthood stood as silent as the ovens of Auschwitz, grim reminders of depravity, defanged. Imagine a world where the life of an unborn child is as precious as the life of a pig or a bird.

Imagine a world where our representatives had the guts to protect the unborn.

House Republican leadership tonight abruptly dropped a bill that would ban elective abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy.

According to news reports, female GOP lawmakers raised concerns on the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, prompting party leaders to realize they did not have the votes to pass the bill.

Prominent Republican members who rallied against the plan to limit late-term abortions include Reps. Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania, Renee Ellmers of North Carolina and Jackie Walorski of Indiana.

I’ll defer comments on their cowardice to my wife, who posted this on Facebook earlier today:

I am so saddened by this news. 18,000 preemies are murdered each year, 18,000. How can such a wonderful nation support these murderers. We act so compassionate for mental health, those bullied, beheading across the world, shootings of innocents, MIA, KIA, and wounded warriors. But those who passed this ‘right’ to allow such atrocities be damned. My heart is broken for those 18,000 preemies housed in a warm womb for 6 months, only to be brutally killed and disposed of like garbage. What are those who opposed this bill and those 18,000 mothers each year thinking? Moreso, what are those doctors, nurses, and caregivers, and insurance companies think they are doing for society at large? I am just so sad.

What can I add to that? Somewhere, Satan is smiling. And Jesus is weeping.

Today is the annual March For Life. It’s been 42 years since the holocaust of abortion was “legalized” by the forces of evil. 57,762,169 souls snuffed out before they could be born.

Pray with Pope Francis, pray that the hearts of our leaders will be opened.

 

 

60 percent of Americans support enacting a 20 week abortion ban. It’s inconceivable that anyone could be so callous as to not feel the suffering of these innocent babies.

And yet, abortion is the holy sacrament of feminism. A woman isn’t really liberated until she’s had one, or so I’m told.

I’ll leave you with the wisdom of President Reagan:

“I’ve noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born.” – Ronald Reagan, September 21, 1980

.
.

Share

Planned Parenthood Chief Cecile Richards: “We Proudly” Kill Babies…

Share

 photo cecilerichards_babykiller_zps3c41a35c.jpg

Hat/Tip to WeaselZippers.

Cecile Richards is the President of Planned Parenthood and she recently said she’s proud to kill babies.

Well, truthfully, not in so many words, but she DID say this:

“We proudly provide safe and legal abortion.”

Here is the video from that event. Then down below that is a video of an interview in which she was pressed to state when she thought life began.


As said above, the next video is from an interview and it shows Cecile Richards trying desperately to avoid the question of when life begins. On the Fusion TV program, America with Jorge Ramos, he finally pins her down to say that she believes life begins when the baby is born. So evidently Ms. Richards believes that on the last day before the end of the pregnancy, it is okay to end a baby’s life.


Margaret Sanger would be proud…

.

.

.

Share

Jonathan Gruber Thinks Abortion Is A Good Way To Save On Welfare

Share

african-americans-abortion-billboard-AFP

Hat/Tip to Nickarama at WeaselZippers.

Eugenics, anyone? Now Gruber is on record saying that abortions help keep ‘marginal children’ off of the welfare roles and out of prison.

Eeks! ObamaCare Architect Jonathan Gruber: Abortion Of “Marginal Children” A “Social Good”

Simultaneously racist, classist and evil all in one anti-individual collectivist package…

Via Breitbart:

Embattled MIT professor Jonathan Gruber has not only gotten in trouble for bragging about helping President Obama put one over on the American people with ObamaCare, he’s also been uncovered as an abortion advocate—but not a run-of-the-mill advocate of “women’s rights.”

No, Gruber’s abortion advocacy is of a particularly pungent eugenics variety. He’s on record repeatedly making the case from social science that abortion is a “social good” because it reduces the number of “marginal children,” by which he means urban poor—those he says can be counted on to commit crimes if they were ever born.

Gruber co-authored a paper during the Clinton years which argued that legal abortion had saved the U.S. taxpayer upwards of $14 billion in welfare benefits and that it also lowered crime.

Read the full story here.

.

.

.

Share

Religious Liberty Dies in California, Churches are Forced to Pay for Elective Abortions

Share

 photo ReligiouslibertydiesinCaliforniachurchesareforcedtopayforelectiveabortions_zpsb027a569.jpg
 

Feminism’s holy sacrament of abortion will not be denied.

The California Department of Managed Health Care hath decreed that all employers, including churches, must pay for elective abortions in their health insurance plans.

A coalition of pro-life groups is challenging the mandate.

A campaign against the state of California mandating abortion coverage in insurance plans is intensifying. Several complaints have been filed with the federal government to keep it from violating what Christian legal groups consider American’s fundamental rights and go against their religiously held beliefs and conscience.

The Department of Managed Health Care has ordered all employers, including churches and other religious organizations such as colleges and universities, to pay for elective abortions in their plans.

Alliance Defending Freedom and Life Legal Defense Foundation are representing seven California churches who object to the coverage, alleging the mandate violates federal law. One of the churches being represented is Dr. Jim Garlow’s Skyline Church in San Diego, which does not want be forced into funding the practice of abortion through its health care coverage.

Casey Mattox, an attorney with the Christian legal group, Alliance Defending Freedom, argues that the Golden State has gone too far by trouncing the liberties that they hold dear.

“Forcing a church to be party to elective abortion is one of the most unimaginable assaults on our most fundamental American freedoms,” Mattox asserts.

Mattox argues that there is no way California should be allowed to bypass federal law and end up getting away with forcing churches to fund a practice that the Bible specifically teaches against.

Christianity is under attack by a tyranny more insidious than anything George III could have dreamed of. Homofascists now demand church-sanctioned “weddings.” HHS mandates coverage for contraceptives, abortifascients, and sterlizations. And here the State of California goes one better, requiring their 30 pieces of silver for infanticide.

Appealing to Obama’s HHS is pointless. They’re obviously delighted with California’s regulations, and their only question is how to extend mandatory elective abortion coverage to all 57 states.

Religious liberty’s only hope lies with the U.S. Supreme Court.

Alas, given SCOTUS’ recent abominable 6-3 decision against Texas abortion law in Whole Woman’s Health v Lakey, it appears that both Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy have gone over to the Dark Side. They’re apparently reluctant to place any “undo burden” on a woman’s “right” to murder her unborn child.

I can easily see them agreeing that paying for her own abortion is indeed an “undo burden.”

America has lost her moral compass. Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us.

According to this analysis, “the law” is on California’s side.

First, the California abortion mandate is a law of general applicability. This means no violation of the First Amendment: Under U.S. Supreme Court precedent, religious freedom doesn’t matter.

But Hobby Lobby! Nope. HL is a limited cased based on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The RFRA only applies to federal law, not state.

Since California could care less about religious freedom, we don’t have an RFRA-type law.

But Obamacare forbids states from discriminating against policies that don’t provide abortion coverage. True. Alliance Defending Freedom and Life Legal Defense Foundation are on the case.

Go get them, guys, but as the story says, good luck with that.

The Obama Administration is pro-abortion. More, it has amply demonstrated it won’t enforce laws or regulations with which it disagrees. Thus, I would be very surprised if Obamacarians brought its fellow ideological travelers in California to heel.

So sue! Sure. But I have two words for you: “Ninth Circuit.”

Bottom line: California has crossed the post-Christian bridge into the anti-Christian era.

The Obama Administration has too.

So have most courts, particularly the Ninth Circuit.

I don’t expect these churches to find legal relief short of the Supreme Court. And that will take years.

Ugh.

So I say, “disobey.” Refuse to offer abortion coverage.

Dare California to put ministers and priests in jail.

We are all martyrs for Christ. Let us be martyrs for the unborn too.

.

.

.

Share

Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards: Killing My Baby “Wasn’t A Difficult Decision”…

Share

Obama and Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards.

Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards with President Barack Obama

 

Hat/Tip to WeaselZippers.

It never fails to just flabbergast me how the left can be so casual about murdering babies. Cecile Richards said that it wasn’t a difficult decision to kill her baby. I wonder, did anyone consult the baby on that decision?

Coming from the head of America’s largest abortion mill, why am I not surprised?

Via LifeNews:

The head of the nation’s biggest abortion business disclosed today that she herself had an abortion and apparently it was no big deal to take the b  life of her unborn child.

Planned Parenthood does over 330,000 abortions on an annual basis and Richards opened up about her own abortion in an essay published in Elle on Friday, writing that she thinks of more women share their abortion decisions it will stop the “stigma” surrounding abortion.

I had an abortion. It was the right decision for me and my husband, and it wasn’t a difficult decision,” Richards writes. “Before becoming president of Planned Parenthood eight years ago, I hadn’t really talked about it beyond family and close friends. But I’m here to say, when politicians argue and shout about abortion, they’re talking about me — and millions of other women around the country.”

Richards doesn’t provide the details surrounding her abortion — how old the baby was at the time of the abortion or why she ended her baby’s life rather than carrying the pregnancy to term or considering adoption.

No, it never fails to flabbergast me, and it always disgusts me how the left values life so little.

Read the full story here.

.

.

Share

NJ Medical Board Revokes Late-Term Abortionist Steven Chase Brigham’s License

Share
Steven Chase Brigham in of his mugshots

It’s good to know that some things are beyond the pale even for the ultra-liberals in New Jersey. Steven Chase Brigham fancied himself as a cross between notorious late-term abortionists George Tiller and Kermit Gosnell, and he has the dead babies in his freezer to prove it.

Yesterday his medical license was finally revoked.

The state’s physician disciplinary board tonight revoked the license of Steven C. Brigham, a controversial doctor accused of skirting state rules by starting the process of late-term abortions with five women in his South Jersey office, and ordering them to drive to his Maryland clinic where the procedure was finished.

Finding several counts of gross negligence, deception and official misconduct against him, the state Board of Medical Examiners also ordered Brigham to pay $140,000 in penalties. At a future hearing, the board will decide how much of the state’s court costs he will be ordered to pay; the tab is expected to exceed $500,000.

The board suspended Brigham’s license in 2010 after the Attorney General’s Office argued he used the two-state process to evade New Jersey’s requirement that terminating pregnancies must take place in a hospital or licensed health care facility after 14 weeks. Brigham did not have hospital privileges at the time and is not an obstetrician or a gynecologist.

From his main office in Voorhees, Brigham inserted a device, Laminaria, to expand his patients’ cervixes, and administered a shot of Digoxin to cause “fetal demise.” At his instruction, his patients later drove to drive to a clinic in Elkton, Md. where the fetus would be surgically removed would by another doctor in consultation with Brigham.

Brigham was not licensed to practice medicine in Maryland, but his lawyer said he thought he was following Maryland law that allowed its doctors to consult with out-of-state physicians.

Totally on the up and up, right? Because his shill in Maryland was 87 years old and had never actually performed an abortion. No sane person would let these 2 clowns perform any other surgery, why let them kill babies? Oh, right, emanations of penumbras and stuff.

Brigham’s attorney Joseph Gorrell described his client as a devoted physician who felt compelled to fill the void for late-term abortion services after George Tiller, a family doctor in Kansas, was shot to death in May 2009. Tiller had been the only physician east of Colorado willing to perform late-term abortions in the country.

What a humanitarian!

And if a poor immigrant woman happens to die in the process, hey, abortion is like a feminist sacrament or something and it can’t be restricted no matter what.

So for more than 20 years Steven Chase Brigham botched abortion after abortion, and left a trail of misery in at least 8 states. Because that’s Women’s Health Care!

No one wants to admit it, but Brigham’s operation is far from unique. It’s the norm for how abortionists do business. They’re cold-hearted killers, working in the shadows, because what they do is too hideous to be seen in the light of day. And sadly, far too many “pro-choice” Americans don’t really want to know the gory details of their “choice” anyway. To them it’s all hearts and flowers and rainbows and grrl power. Feminist dogma glosses over the very real and very dead baby whose life isn’t considered worth remembering and besides who are we to intrude on a woman’s right to not be inconvenienced by motherhood?

Yesterday the forces of darkness were dealt a blow. It’s a small victory, but I’ll take it. Meanwhile, pray for the innocent victims of abortion, 55 million souls, consigned to Purgatory through no fault of their own.

Share

Dem Sen. Mark Udall Says He Supports Abortion During the Eighth Month of Pregnancy

Share

Mark Udall

Hat/Tip to WeaselZippers.

The GOP has a ‘War on Women’ and it includes attacking every woman’s right to kill her unborn child…

But don’t worry, it’s still those crazy Republicans who hold extremist views on abortion.

Via Weekly Standard:

At the outset of the Denver Post‘s senatorial debate on Tuesday night, a moderator asked Democratic senator Mark Udall the following question: “We know that you support a woman’s right to choose, but given the advances in scientific understanding of fetal development, where pregnant mothers know at which week babies grow fingernails and can swallow, would you support a ban on late-term abortions and if so at what week?”

Udall replied by citing the case of a woman who discovered during the eighth month of pregnancy that her child had a severe brain deformity. “To demand that that woman carry that child to term would be a form of government intervention that none of us want to see happen. We ought to respect the women of Colorado and their point of view,” Udall said.

Read the full story here.

Share

Obama Admin Defies SCOTUS, New HHS Mandates are a Distinction Without a Difference

Share

 photo scotushhshobbylobbyruling_zpsea5db27a.jpg
New HHS Secretary Sylvia Burwell, late of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s population control efforts, has again “revised” Obamacare’s anti-Catholic abortifascient and and birth control mandate. But her new regulations still firmly place the burden of providing life-destroying drugs and procedures on the employer.

Meet the new form, it’s functionally equivalent to the old form.

The new arrangement as a more complicated accounting gimmick, no different in effect than its predecessors.

Arina Grossu, Director for the Center for Human Dignity at the Family Research Council, said the amendment “is simply another clerical layer because the employer still remains the legal gateway by which these drugs and services will be provided to their employees. It’s very disappointing that the Obama administration is doubling down on its plans to punish charities and non-profits that assist the poor and homeless, who in some cases have nowhere else to turn for assistance.”

Although the Obama administration is still seeking comments for its final implementation of the new rule, the nation’s religious leaders concur that the latest change still fails to observe all Americans’ First Amendment freedom of religion.

“On initial review of the government’s summary of the regulations, we note with disappointment that the regulations would not broaden the ‘religious employer’ exemption to encompass all employers with sincerely held religious objections to the mandate,” Archbishop Joseph E. Kurtz of Louisville, Kentucky, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), said on Friday. “Instead, the regulations would only modify the ‘accommodation,’ under which the mandate still applies and still requires provision of the objectionable coverage.”

“Also, by proposing to extend the ‘accommodation’ to the closely held for-profit employers that were wholly exempted by the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Hobby Lobby, the proposed regulations would effectively reduce, rather than expand, the scope of religious freedom,” he added.

Who gets the “opt-out” form is irrelevant. Forcing a religious organization to ask for the objectionable coverage is the real problem. Morally, Catholics cannot participate in any aspect of provisioning life-destroying drugs and procedures.

Instead of working with the USCCB, the Obama administration went back to the Kermit Gosnell Fan Club at Planned Parenthood for input on their “revised” mandate rules. And of course they baked in onerous penalties for anyone who follows his faith.

“Effective immediately, this latest rule still orders charities like the Little Sisters of the Poor, non-profit Christian colleges like Wheaton College, and religious broadcasters like EWTN to violate their consciences simply because they legally contract for health coverage,” Grossu continued. “The government uses their contract as the basis to force their insurers to provide their employees with free contraception and drugs that can kill human embryos, against their sincere conscientious beliefs.”

“If these charities and non-profits follow their conscience and decline to participate in the meaningless accounting gimmick, the administration will make them pay huge penalties accruable on a daily basis — one hundred dollars per employee per day,” she said.

“Additionally, the government is also soliciting comment on new ways to force family businesses to violate their deeply held moral and religious convictions due to the HHS mandate in an attempt to address and skirt the recent Supreme Court ruling. However, the government’s actions here still force family businesses to be complicit in what they view as morally wrong,” Grossu added.

Obama and his henchmen are being purposefully obtuse, thumbing their noses at the Supreme Court, and at religious Americans too. They are beholden to a cabal of radical feminists hell-bent on overthrowing all vestiges of traditional morality. They only respect the Progressive hegemony of the State, and all other forms of authority must be eradicated lest they instill doubt in the minds of the citizenry.

So everyone has to conform, or the invalidity of the State’s coercion will become all too apparent.

Fortunately, the Supreme Court has already told HHS they can’t do this. Alas, the price of Liberty is eternal vigilance.

Share

Planned Parenthood caught giving award for most abortions

Share

PPabortionquota

Hat/Tip to WeaselZippers.

Planned Parenthood Gives Worker Award For “Exceeding Abortion Visits”…

 

Former Planned Parenthood director, Abby Johnson was shocked to see that her employer would have quotas on the number of abortions performed. Yes, the same Planned Parenthood which in the past said it wants abortions to be safe, rare and legal.

Riiigghhht.

Via former Planned Parenthood director Abby Johnson:

Ever since I left Planned Parenthood, I have been talking about the abortion quotas that are established inside abortion facilities.  Many abortion supporters refused to believe it, citing that surely Planned Parenthood wants abortion to be safe, legal and RARE.  If they want something to be RARE, they certainly wouldn’t have quotas, right?

We recently had a clinic worker leave the affiliate, Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains.  This affiliate runs the 2nd largest Planned Parenthood facility in the U.S.  At this clinic in Denver, they give out various awards to their satellite clinics and post these awards on a bulletin board for everyone to see.

When our former worker saw this award on public display, it really started to change her thinking about Planned Parenthood’s motivation.  This award was given to their Aurora clinic for “exceeding abortion visits first half of fiscal year 2012 compared to first half of fiscal year 2013.”

Keep reading…

Share

Jesus isn’t in the Constitution … neither is the right to abortion

Share

I have to laugh at this …

Via: American Thinker

The president will arrive on Tuesday night with a 900-strong entourage, including 45 vehicles and three cargo planes. Advance security teams orchestrating every last detail have combed Brussels already, checking the sewers and the major hospitals, while American military helicopters were last week given the green light for overflights. The city hosts at least four EU summits a year, with each of these gatherings costing €500,000 in extra police, military and transport expenses. “But this time round, you can multiply that figure by 20,” said Brussels mayor, Yvan Mayeur.

In the mean time Michelle and family are in China naturally at the expense of the American taxpayer expense. Just the hotel bill exceeds $8,000 a night. And Mrs. Obama is making speeches revealing how hard she had it growing up.  Poor girl, but she’s making up for it now!

And she is making an impression …

Thanks to   for the picture

mother-robinson

 

I thank God we’re in the home-stretch of having to support these freaks. I can feel the relief right now knowing Barack and Michelle, mom, kids, dogs … well the dogs can stay … are on their way out of the White House. They’ve disgraced the office of the presidency in every way imaginable. I read somewhere that the office of the presidency deserves the respect of all citizens. My reply is … not when the occupant of the office doesn’t respect it or his oath of office or the U.S. Constitution. Some suggest because they once wore a uniform they are offended that people would attack the “high offices of this beloved country”.  What offends me is how people once wore a uniform but honor and dignity weren’t part of the outfit. Wearing a military uniform at some point in the past or even now doesn’t make one patriotic or posses a love for America. There are many wearing uniforms today who know Obama is a fraud … but the honor that’s supposed to accompany that uniform isn’t there, thus Obama is free fundamentally change the United States.  The long and short description of people such as those is hypocrites. We could even include traitors. These are the very same people who will attempt to quote Bible scriptures to support idiocy … and then turn around and suggest Jesus Christ was a homosexual. I read once where some liberal blog site claimed America never was a Christian nation because the words “Jesus” and “Christian” are not in the Constitution.  Okay that’s cool, but why is abortion a Constitutional right when it’s not in there? I see the right to life in there and the right to keep and bear arms. Liberals have taken the right to life away from the most innocent, and the right to keep and bear arms without infringement they hate just as much as innocent life.

Yes, it’s going to take some work to undo all the damage team Obama has done to America. I think maybe the 2014 elections could be a start. I believe the Democrats are going to get spanked pretty hard and hopefully a lot of the establishment Republicans will be forced out of office as well. Americans are tired of being led by a fraud whose turned this nation into a cesspool of perversion and the embarrassment he’s brought on America.

 Cry and Howl

Share