Great Moments in Civil Discourse: Liberals Show ‘Tolerance’ for #TrestinsFast


Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

#TrestinsFast is an effort to raise awareness regarding the overstepping of a Federal Judge.  When Trestin Meacham contacted me about this, I told him that once word got out, it would generate a hateful reaction from the forces of “tolerance and diversity.”  Because, as we all know, any opposition to the regressive doctrine is classified as “hate.”  And, it’s OK to harass, insult, ridicule, and censor anyone who is a “hater,” right?  Here are some examples…

Statement: Hey, ObamaCare is causing people to lose their plans, have their work hours cut, causing job losses, and people are suffering.

Response from “tolerant” regressive:  HATER!  OPPOSING OBAMACARE IS RAAAAACIST!!!!!

Statement:  Wow, it’s colder, and all of the global cooling global warming climate change the Big Lie predictions are failing to come true.   Oh, and that global warming ship got stuck in the ice that wasn’t there in 1912, and the icebreaker sent to rescue them is stuck too!


Statement:  I believe in Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior, and while I would never harm gays, the Muslims all over the world persecute and kill them. 

Response from “tolerant” regressive: HATER!!!!!   (Muslims, what Muslims?  We won’t protest the ones who are killing gays.  We’ll attack the Christians;you know…HATE!)

You get the idea.  Any effort to discuss something, especially using facts, will be attacked.  After all, regressives rely on lies (If you like your plan…) to get things done.  Exposing people to facts mean that the presenter of the facts must be attacked.  Even opinions that oppose regressive doctrine must be destroyed.  You simply cannot disagree with them.

So, getting back to #TrestinsFast, we knew that there would be hate and nonsense spouted, because that is what regressives do.  So, I knew far more of the coverage would be about the reaction than the fast itself, sadly.  However, it provides the opportunity to show what the forces of “tolerance” are really all about.  Here are a bunch of screen captures for you.  Get ready to feel the ‘tolerance.”

From the Daily Mail…


Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Aren’t you just feeling the “tolerance” oozing from these comments?  But on a serious note, we know that this type of thing is going to be the norm…

Blessed are you when people hate you, when they exclude you and insult you and reject your name as evil, because of the Son of Man.

Luke 6:22 NIV

You will be hated by everyone because of me, but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved.

Matthew 10:22 NIV

In the end, we knew that #TrestinsFast is about raising awareness and making a statement.  We also knew that it would bring out the hate from the people that pretend to preach tolerance.  In that sense, #TrestinsFast  is also a “trap” to expose  their hate form Christianity, and challenge them on their “tolerance” of that religion that is sworn to their destruction, yet they will not challenge it at all.  And, yes, you can smell their hypocrisy.  Only their point of view is tolerated, and civil discourse means that only they are allowed to speak.

NOTE:  All comments are being sent straight to moderation for approval.  Remember that I’m not in the “douchebag rights” camp, so I don’t allow people to simple troll or spout hate on the blog.  Don’t cry about free speech.  It’s my blog, so it’s not a public space.



Great Moments in Civil Discourse: Actor Chris Noth Thinks Tea Party Members Should be ‘Horsewhipped’


Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Another liberal has shown their true colors, and has engaged in “civil discourse.”  See what Chris Noth had to say about the Tea Party…

Actor Chris Noth_ ‘Every Tea Party member should be horsewhipped’ _ Twitchy - 2013-10-17_23.01.07

Tolerant fellow, isn’t he?

Jim Treacher, of course, had the appropriate response.  Folks like Noth would likely urinate all over himself if he actually tried to do that to a real human being, especially one that has a healthy love of the Second Amendment.  Of course, dimwits like Noth are one of the reasons that we have a Second Amendment.

Note:  No, I’m not threatening to hunt Chris Noth down and do bad things to him.  What I am suggesting is that if he tried to make good on his asinine threat, he would be confronting a person that wouldn’t likely have an issue about defending themselves.  The lesson is this: when utilizing social media, one should take care to not have his or her keyboard “write checks” that ones “a** can’t cash.”


Great Moments in Civil Discourse: Liberals Threaten to Kill NRA Members



They’re liberal, tolerant, diverse, and loving…

And they’ll kill you if they disagree with them.  At least that’s what many of the liberals on Twitter were saying as of late. Freedom Outpost has the details, via Free Republic…

kill nra


Um, do these people even know that they are proving the point? If someone did go after a NRA event, or a NRA office, what are the odds that they will be killed by an armed citizen?  Go after a bunch of NRA members at an event, and they may go down in a hail of gunfire!  But that’s the point, right?  The reason that mass shootings are successful is that there is no one there to defend the defenseless, or that adults are not permitted to defend themselves, or others.

But, these folks are liberals, so reality doesn’t matter to them, only their own tolerance hate.


Site News: Political Scraps Gets a Makeover


For those of you that have been following our plots and and endeavors at the CH 2.0, you know that there has been a forum here for a long time.  In fact, the forum came before the blog.  A few weeks ago, John, Don, and I hatched a plot called “Political Scraps.”  The concept is simple: have a place for everyone to debate with one important caveat-we would follow President Obama’s  call for “Civil Discourse.”  That, of course, would force all involved to stick with the facts, and that would make things rather interesting.

While that plan seemed to be sound, the forum itself was proving to be a problem.    It was transferred from the original Conservative Hideout, and as such was dated.  In fact, the version of the  forum software that powered it was discontinued, and it could no longer be updated.  Also, new features and themes were not being developed, and the new, shiny version of the software could not seem to transfer all of the data from the original.  So, I had no choice but to do a fresh install.

The new and improved forum is more flexible, easier to administer, and has more features and themes coming on line all the time.  So, check it out.   Click on the post image, and you’ll be transferred to the forum.


Great Moments in Civil Discourse: Hoffa again proves that he doesn't have to use "New Tone"


Remember, friends, when we were told that we had to engage in “civil discourse,” and the “new tone?”  Well, as usual, the union thugs have declared themselves immune to that dictate once again…

Typical goon behavior.

Notice how Hoffa refers to collective bargaining as a Constitutional Right?  Let’s compare that to other rights…

1.  Free Speech means that I can say and write what I like, so as long as I am not violating the rights of others.

2.  Freedom of Religion means that I can worship any God I want, or choose not to worship at all.

3.  The Right to Keep and Bear Arms means that I can own guns, and that, by the way, does not deprive others of the same right.

Now take a look at those, they are rights that each INDIVIDUAL can exercise.  Each of us CHOOSE what to say (or stay silent), how to worship (or not at all), or whether to own guns (or not at all).  Let’s contrast that with collective bargaining.  At it’s simplest, collective bargaining means that 51% of a group can FORCE the other 49% of the group to join an organization that they do not want.  That, and that 49% MUST pay dues, that they do not want to pay, to that same organization, who will then use it against their best interests.

Does that sound like a Constitutional Right to you?


Longshoremen Thugs Edit Video to Hide Their Own Thug Activites


According to the Left-Wing Institute for Civil Discourse, the ILWU (Longshoremen Union), had posted a video showing a SUV hitting a poor, defenseless, union member. Here is that video…

Obviously, the driver of the SUV was some deranged Tea Party member, under the control of Sarah Palin’s bulls eye electoral map, right?

Well, probably not.  You see, the union thugs edited the video heavily, and removed the audio.  Why? you might ask?  The answer is found right in the unedited footage…

As you can see, the union goons jumped in front of the SUV, and others were hitting the vehicle with their signs.  Also note what they did to the second vehicle.  See that they tried to open the door?  Now, what do you think they would have done to that driver had they got him or her out of that vehicle?  And, you can hear why they deleted the video- not exactly “civil discourse,” is it?  In the end, it was typical thug behavior, caught on video.

Once again, a union is caught being what they are, a band of thugs.  This time, it is with their own video!

H/T:  Left-Wing Institute for Civil Discourse


Great Moments in Civil Discourse: Union Thug Threatens TV News Crew


It has crossed my mind that union thugs would eventually get a tad bit conscious of cameras.  After all, they have been exposed engaging in their special brand of “democracy” so many times, that too many people are figuring out what the thugs are all about. We saw some of that in Wisconsin, where goons tried to cover cameras, and attack those using them.  Here is the latest example, from those hostage taking Longshoreman in Washington state…


Is this what “democracy” looks like?  Why yes, yes it is.  In fact, the only way that it would have been more “democratic” is if the goon had smashed the camera, and assaulted the crew, because, as you all know, that is what “democracy” looks like!

I wonder if the regressives will condemn this as hateful?  Yeah, I know, that’s a laugh.

Seriously though, as the unions, and other regressive entities realize that their own activities are damaging to their movements, they will be on the alert for cameras.  They do not want the world seeing what they do-they only want the sanitized version that their PR people and union bosses release.   Violence, intimidation, death threats, and the like makes the leftist narrative ring a bit hollow.  However, they aren’t going to stop it, they just don’t want the rest of the world to know about it.

I have also suggested that if you are going to a protest, you should have a camera.  For one, everything has to be documented, and for two, they are going to hesitate to go after on person with a camera is 15 other cameras are on them.  I bought a cheap digital cam for about $30 to take to any potential problems in my area.  That way, if it get’s trashed, it’s no major loss.  In daylight it takes pretty good video, and if that goes, my cell phone is a back up.


Verizon Strike Update: "Civil Discourse" means "Open Season" and "Torture," but that is "American" as Apple Pie


Another day goes by, and here’s another dose of union thuggery…

Meet the New Tone, Same as the Old Tone…

From NewsChannel 9:

The voice of a representative [in Brooklyn] encourages members to deal harshly with “managers and scabs.”

“It is open season. Follow them safely, but when you get to a location, torture them, torture them with chants and noise. Be so loud that they can’t concentrate and wish they never got out of bed,” says the recorded voice.

Another part of the message states:

“They are trying to break our union. Understand brothers and sisters, we can never let these [expletive] piece of [expletive] pigs break us. So, we are stepping up our efforts.”

The message stopped short of calling for physical violence, but it was removed after a NewsChannel 9 reporter called the CWA for comment.

The recording was removed because a union representative said he didn’t want any misconceptions about their intentions, which may sound crude, but always stayed within the boundaries of the law.

Wow folks! Where is the cries against “inflamtory rhetoric?” Where is the President to make calls for “civil discourse?”

I guess that doesn’t apply to union goons.

Apparently, the motto should have read, “Baseball, Hot Dogs, Union Thugs, and Chevrolet…”

So then, vandalism, sabotage, threats, intimidation, “torture,” and general thuggery is “democratic?”  Of course, this is from the same folks that want to eliminate the secret ballot from union elections, flee their states to avoid voting, and beat up people that vote against them.  You know, “This is what democracy looks like?”  It’s just easier to remember that for a  regressive, “democracy” means that you are free to vote with them as much as you like.  If you don’t, however, there’s a club wielding goon to make you regret the error of your ways.


Great Moments in Civil Discourse: Retroactive Redux


If you thought that political discourse is bad now, let’s take a look back at the nineteenth century.  Reason TV took the words of two candidates for POTUS, and put them in campaign commercial form…

At any rate, there was never an age of genteel discussion, where gentlemen sipped tea and calmly discussed the divisive issues of the day.  American politics have always been cut-throat, and probably always will be.

Also, you might want to consider that there has not been a beating on the floor of the Senate for some time, unlike this infamous incident.

So, while our left decries “incivility,” while embracing it like a crack addict does his pipe, just remember that this is tame in comparison to our history.  However, rest assured that that will, in no way, prevent me from point out the lefts complete hypocrisy in that regard.


Great Moments in Civil Discourse: The SEIU Wants to "Smash us to the Ground"


Remember all the warning against “inflammatory rhetoric” that causes mentally ill people to become violent?  Well, like all hypocritical leftist groups, the SEIU thinks it’s perfectly OK to do exactly that.  The Blaze has the video…

So, I’d like to challenge the SEIU to condemn this violent rhetoric.  But, of course, they won’t.  It’s OK when they do it.

By the way, that all “smashing” people down is going to backfire on you.  You’re being posted on line, and the whole world is watching your thuggery.  The more you do, the more we post, and the more people get to see what you really are…goon and thugs.


Great Moments in Civil Discourse: Wisconsin Union Members Didn't Get the Memo


Well, it’s time to again take the “pulse” of civil discourse in the US.  Apparently, our leftists see it as their mission to kill it off.

Evidence, you ask?  Take a look at this…

H/T: CNS News

Whoa thar!  What happened to the civil discourse that we’re supposed to be using?   What happened to the claim that crosshairs cause mentally ill people to kill others?  Why are our would-be “progressive” overlords using the same inflammatory rhetoric that we are supposed to avoid? I now call on every union involved in this protest to condemn these hate messages, lest we let the rest of the world know of their hypocrisy.  Or is it too late for that?


Great Moments in Civil Discourse: Chris Matthews Uses Inflamtory Rhetoric Against Gingrich and Palin


This is part of my ongoing effort to remind our would-be “progressive” masters about their commitment towards “civil discourse.”  Apparently, Chris Matthews didn’t get the memo…

Here’s some of the transcript…

MATTHEWS: I think if you look closely at Newt Gingrich, you see a mortal enemy to our civilization.

MATTHEWS: She talks like a cuckoo clock. In fact, I think when she gets that Sarah Palin named patented, that’s what she should sell, cuckoo clocks with her coming out every hour or half hour.

I’m sure the Mr. Matthews simply forgot that in our brave new world of civil discourse, comments like these encourage the mentally ill to kill people.  At the very least, this will cause the former speaker and Governor Palin to receive more death threats.  I am certain that once he realizes his error, he’ll release an apology.

5, 4, 3, 2, 1…

Why do I hear crickets??