To Eric Holder: America’s Strength Didn’t Come From Cowards

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

What do you get when you stack liberals in a heap?  A pile of ass.

Sorry, just had to get that in.

Holy Cow! I’ve always known that liberals worship at the feet of Barack Obama. Barack is their god, their king, and their savior. It doesn’t matter that he’s a pathological liar. It doesn’t matter that he been accused of being a homosexual by folks offering very credible accounts of his nefarious and lascivious deeds. It doesn’t matter that with every second he occupies the White House that he is weakening the United States in every way. The lengths they will go through to defend the indefensible Obama is absolutely stunning.  Bill O’Reilly interviewed Barack last week, and personally I think he soft-balled the guy. Of course if you ask Obama anything real tough, then you’re a racist and you don’t respect the office of the presidency. Geraldo Rivera said to Bill O’Reilly, “What you did, is strip him of his majesty”.

I rest my case on the “worshiping” part.

O’Reilly said something like he doesn’t think Obama is intentionally harming the United States. I have to ask … what does the freak have to do to convince you Mr. O’Reilly? Literally every thing he’s done has harmed the United States, so if he’s not doing it intentionally, what then?

Contrary to what Eric Holder thinks and the disgusting crap that proceeds out of his mouth, America wasn’t built by cowards. And America’s strength didn’t come from folks like him who have a racist chip on their shoulders. In truth the only reason the United States is able to endure the years of Barack Obama and Mr. Holder is through her strength she gained in the past by men and women willing to give, not take. America has been weakened by the fraud-in-chief and his ilk, and everyone world-wide knows it. The only ones who don’t know it are those who are convinced they are victims of some perceived mistreatment.

The path to a strong nation isn’t through weakness and pacifying our enemies. It isn’t by sending your women into battle on the front lines with battle hardened troops. A powerful nation isn’t built on perversion. A great nation isn’t built on leaders who are lawless and coddles the enemy, or spend their time convincing everyone that life in America is so unfair. Barack Obama and Eric Holder are the exact opposite of whom JFK spoke of;  they’re busy seeking what America can do for them … and never giving back; seeking to destroy her from within.

Original Post:  Cry and Howl

Share

Battle Ready Betty

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Battle Ready BettyIn the latest bit of reality-bending psychopathy imposed by Barack Obama and the socialists of the Jackass Party, the ban upon sending women into direct combat has been lifted.  The braying donkeys who claim for the public good the right to confiscate your salt, your sugar, your firearms, and your fossil fuels will now, in order to ensure a ‘fairness’ that never has and never will exist,  send your wives and daughters into hell –  one which, of course, most of them managed to successfully avoid:

[…] Combat is no place for a woman. Every grunt knows that. So do most women. Only generals are confused…

You’ll notice that soldiers are no longer called soldiers, or Marines Marines. They’re “service members” now, as if they were waiters, filling-station attendants or bedpan orderlies. You wouldn’t expect to find the likes of Stonewall Jackson, John J. Pershing or George S. Patton Jr. at the Pentagon, but there are plenty of generals and admirals lined up to get their tickets punched and promoted to the next rank. The only shots many of them have ever confronted were shots of Jack Daniel’s at the Officers Club…

What kind of man sends a woman to do the fighting work of men?

We’ve got a different kind of man in Washington now, a man who may well reflect the attitudes, assumptions and prejudices of the people who sent him here. Sen. Carl M. Levin of Michigan, the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, likes sending a woman to fight for him because “it reflects the reality of 21st century military operations.” He couldn’t bear to call “war” by its rightful name. Mr. Levin had to miss the war of his generation; he was at Harvard learning to be a lawyer. But he made up for missing the Vietnam War with duty on the Senate Armed Services Committee… (The Craven Retreat Of The Generals | Pruden & Politics)

Ban Democrats, not guns.  You’ll save more lives.  Maybe even your own.

Share

Fighting Words

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Despite what some of my less than tolerant liberal acquaintances may believe, my military experience does not date back to the era of hardtack and beans — soldiers in the field in my day supped on such culinary catastrophes as ham and chopped eggs delivered in an olive-drab tin can laboriously broached (especially when the icy January winds that regularly blast through the Fulda Gap have demobilized your every digit) by the ubiquitous P38P-38 (OPENER, CAN, HAND, FOLDING, TYPE I).  The quality of these antique military victuals may be adduced by the fact that everyone’s favorite item in a case of C-rations was generally the finely grained sandpaper that passed for toilet tissue. Fortunately, the old C-rat has gone the way of the musket and the cavalry horse. Not all modern martial transformations are as equally beneficial:

Oblivious to important differences between men and women, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is suing the Department of Defense to lift all combat exemptions for women. Not putting women into combat deprives them of their constitutional rights, the ACLU is arguing on behalf of four servicewomen in a complaint filed Tuesday in a federal court in San Francisco.

[…] The military has kept women out of direct ground combat for a moral reason: Deliberately putting women in harm’s way is not right; and for practical reasons: Women are not as physically strong, and they have an impact on the men around them. In a civilized society, men are raised to protect women. Now some of America’s elite warrior units train men to be indifferent to women’s screams. That’s what passes for “progress” in a “progressive” military. (viaKNIGHT: Deceitful debate over women in combat – Washington Times)

Women In Combat

The argument posed by the left-wing lawyers nesting inside the ACLU that the fair sex possess a Constitutional right to engage in battle is as pernicious as all the other “progressive” legal speculations which inculcate the rot that currently threatens our culture and our national security.  Besides, any woman who really wants to experience combat doesn’t need to join an infantry outfit — all she need do is get married.

[…] The Marine Corps has opened Infantry Officers Course for a pilot program to study how well women could perform in combat roles. The first two females, and only two entered, both quickly flopped; one on the first day, the other within a week. No female marines have yet opted for the next session.

Women aren’t lining up for these positions; it’s mostly activist intellectuals trying to shoehorn pretenses into reality. The Marine Corps began this study at the behest of the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Service (DACOWITS). The Obama administration meddles to fix what isn’t broken …

… There was a study done of women marines during my service. It revealed alarming numbers of WMs who lacked the strength to pull the slide back on a service pistol, an inability to throw hand grenades far enough to refrain from blowing themselves up and little capacity to carry wounded comrades to safety. (Memo To The ACLU: Don’t Put Women Into Combat | Forbes)

Such a study should surprise no one, not even a poisonous leftist like our current president, a man who will routinely place the life and limb of anyone (except himself) at risk in the service of his ideological delusions. But take it from an ex-GI whose training experience includes having had one dropped at his feet one fine Southern afternoon by a fumble-fingered recruit from the Bronx (thank God for long fuses and alert drill instructors) — when it comes to hand delivered explosive devices, a strong and reliable arm is the only thing that’sever politically correct.

Original Post: Be Sure You’re Right, Then Go Ahead

Share