How You Can Help Obama Start WW III!


Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Do you want to help our supreme leader Obama create the mother of all distractions from our domestic woes?  Do you want to be part of something bigger than yourself, even if you end up making most of the world look like Detroit?  Well, we have the answer for you!  Watch the video to learn more…

Won’t you donate today?  With all of the misery caused by ObamaCare, and with all the people dropping out of the job market, President Obama needs a massive distraction.   So, start WW III, and if a Republican wins the White House in 2016, you can take part in the antiwar protests (once they are re-funded)!

H/T: Tammy Bruce


Tomorrow, September 11, 2013, is ‘Don’t Blog About Obama Day!’


Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.


Bob Belvedere, proprietor at The Camp of the Saints, has a great suggestion, with a rationale provided by Robert Stacey McCain…

This morning, Stacy McCain published the following remarks:

You’re not supposed to say that The Syrian Crisis has been manufactured for domestic political purposes. The underlying situation is legitimately serious enough — a two-year civil war in which the dictatorship has allegedly used sarin nerve gas against civilians.

The problem is that this administration is so dishonest and cynical, so committed to campaigning and so inept at governing, that whatever they do, our natural suspicion is that they’re playing politics.

Serious People therefore cannot say what a lot of people suspect: When Congress returned from their August recess, they were due to have hearings on a series of Obama administration scandals — IRS, NSA and especially, Benghazi. By ginning up an international crisis over Syria, Obama was basically shouting: “Look! Squirrel!”

If Syria is the Big Story that all Serious People are supposed to be talking about, all the scandal investigations — IRS, NSA, Benghazi — became by definition Small Stories for Unserious People.

Tomorrow? Yeah, the one-year anniversary of the Benghazi attack, and all anyone will be talking about is the president’s Syria speech.

Tell me again how serious you are, Serious People.

You just got played.

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.


Stacy is dead sold perfect.

Bob suggests, and I concur, that we focus on what are the most important things for this date.



Remember the dead, pray for the living, and don’t fall for Obama’s distractions.

It’s almost funny, I was making my “rounds” of other blogs last night, and I was remarking that the entire Syria issue seemed like the plot of a really bad “b” movie.  So bad is this plot that I think it would fail to meet Ed Wood’s “standard” of quality.  I’ve been struggling to believe the entire thing is even happening.

And when the President’s “reality” cannot overcome the people’s “suspension of disbelief,” he has a big problem.

So, in honor of  Obama’s distraction, and the memory of Ed Wood, I present you with a plot line that did meet Mr. Wood’s standards…

Oh, and this does trigger the CH 2.0’s Parallel Universe Alert.


Making Use of Distraction is the MO of the Left


Big time criminals often use the “modus operandi” (MO) of creating a disturbance in one part of a city to attract the police, while they are carrying out a crime in another part of the city. Because politicians, especially Democrats, are not much different from criminals, they also use distraction as their MO. And, what greater distraction could they wish for than a hotly contested Presidential election.  While everyone is  focused on the election, they are busy with their criminal acts.

The first item on my hit parade may noy be truly criminal but it should be. Look at this excerpt from a recent Questions and Observation post.

Representatives from the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank and the European Commission are due to arrive in Athens next month to assess Greece’s reform efforts.

They are expected to report in time for an 8 October meeting of eurozone finance ministers which will decide on whether to disburse Greece’s next €31bn aid tranche, promised under the terms of the bailout for the country.

American officials are understood to be worried that if they decide Greece has not done enough to meet its deficit targets and withhold the money, it would automatically trigger Greece’s exit from the eurozone weeks before the Presidential election on 6 November.

Oh my … election.  Hey Europe, this is about me!  Suck it up and hold off doing anything until after I win!

The Euro Zone has an  extreme crisis on their hands  that if not handled with care and forethought their entire financial system could come undone. But, our President thinks they should put his reelection hopes ahead of their concerns. Maybe not criminal but certainly shows the psychopathic arrogance of Barack Obama. You didn’t hear about this from the MSM, did you?

Okay, let’s move on to something  that is unquestionably criminal.

From this American Thinker article quoting from The Hill we learn

The Federal Communications Commission is eyeing a proposal to tax broadband Internet service.

Here are the slimy details. For some time now on your phone bill there is a charge called The Universal Service Fund, which is one of those “fairness” programs to make sure everyone has access to phone service. Well, some time ago the FCC without authorization from Congress decided it was only “fair” that everyone should also have access to wide-band internet service. So, they just diverted funds from the Universal Service Fund  to a new fund they call the Connect America Fund. But, the FCC ran into a problem. You see, people began using e-mail more and long distance calls less and the fund they were robbing from began to dry up. So, of course, the only solution is to tax broad-band internet service.  And wouldn’t you know, the big internet service companies think this is a great idea. Let the stupid taxpayers foot the bill for expanding the needed infrastructure instead of them. I am pretty sure that Congress passed a law in or about 1999 to prohibit this but I can not find a reference source. However, it doesn’t matter to the Obama administration. To them, laws are just minor inconveniences that can be ignored.

And, now for Number One on my hit parade,

Is there anyone in America, who is not brain-dead, that doesn’t recall what happened in 2008? Of course, everyone remembers the Sub-prime Mortgage Bubble that burst throwing America into the worse recession since the Great Depression. A bubble that was fomented by Democrats starting with the Carter administration. They pressured mortgage lenders to lower their lending standards  such that people who couldn’t afford homes could buy them anyway. All in the name of “fairness”, of course. America is still suffering from the aftermath of this Democrat fiasco. It is reasonable then to believe that no one in their right mind would want to go there again. Everyone except Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren, that is. You know her. She is the one that taught Barack Obama “You didn’t build that…”.  This must read article from American Thinker has the details.

…that Elizabeth Warren of the Consumer Finance Protection  Bureau, created by Dodd-Frank, has announced that the CFPB is adopting a  20 page “Policy Statement of Discrimination in Lending”.

The policy  statement’s position is that to deny a loan on the grounds that the  applicant can’t repay the money is discrimination if the applicant is black or Hispanic.

What could I possibly say about this that isn’t patently obvious. Ms. Warren is not only insane; she is a criminal.

So, while we are distracted by what should concern us most, the criminals; aka Democrats, are busy doing their best to destroy this country.

Well, that’s what I’m thinking. What are your thoughts?

Original Post:  Conservatives on Fire


May Economic Numbers Discouraging: Will Team Obama Create Another Social Issue to Distract From it?


Once again, the monthly economic numbers represent a disappointment.  The Blaze has more…

U.S. employers created only 69,000 jobs in May, the fewest in a year, and the unemployment rate ticked up.

The dismal jobs data will fan fears that the economy is sputtering. It could also damage President Barack Obama’s re-election prospects. And it could lead the Federal Reserve to take further steps to help the economy.

The Labor Department also said Friday that the economy created far fewer jobs in the previous two months than first thought. It revised those figures down to show 49,000 fewer jobs created. The unemployment rate rose to 8.2 percent from 8.1 percent in April, the first increase in 11 months.

Now, excuse my sarcasm, but the Obama administration has two options…

1.  Blame the Republicans, the Tea Parties, some natural disaster-ANYTHING.  Because, we know that in every leftist regime or organization, when there is a failure, it’s ALWAYS someone else’s fault.

2.  Numbers?  What numbers?  Did you know that the Republicans want to freeze/starve/kill all the poor children/elderly/women?  

Of course, the MSM will tow the line, but we all know that this will fail.

Linked at What Would the Founders Think?  Thanks! 


Media Bias: MSNBC Talking Head Does Not Take Kindly to the Narrative Being Questioned


When the POTUS is pumping out distractions, the job of the dutiful MSM is to keep these stories alive, even if they have to make fools of themselves to do so.  For the latest example, The Other McCain posted the following…

Well, here is the CH 2.0 Translation…

There is a narrative to promote, and it will be promoted. No matter how much reality has to be ignored.

The latest economic figures are not so good, so they have to keep on talking about what Mitt Romney did almost 50 years ago.  Ironically, they couldn’t find the time to figure out what Obama, a much younger man, did in college, the Senate, in Church, or damn near anywhere else.  But, we’ll have to ignore that as well, because, after all, the narrative/distraction must go on!

H/T: The Daley Gator


So Why a “War on Women,” and Now Gay Marriage?


Why have the Democrats and their media lapdogs made contraception, Sandra Fluke, gay marriage, and other inconsequential issues front page news?  So you wont look at or discuss this…

Uh-oh.  Once they run the wheels off of the gay marriage story, what will they have to come up with next?

Considering that the employment numbers look pretty weak, and have therefore not been reported, I think it’s safe to assume that we’ll see more and more social issues to distract from the economic fail.

H/T: Sister Toldja


Obama Supports Gay Marriage: Yet Another Topic to Distract From You-Know-What


OK then, Obama supports gay marriage.  That brings a few questions to mind…

1.  Did anyone really think that he was ever  opposed to gay marriage?

2.  Did anyone actually believe him when he said he was opposed to it?

3.  Does it matter a rat’s anus that he’s now not lying about it?

HINT:  The answer to all three is “no.”

However, there is a purpose to the announcement, and it has nothing to do with gay folks.  It does, however, have everything to do with having something to occupy the MSM and the public debate.  Because, if they stop manufacturing issues to distract the public, we might just have to talk about the economy, gas prices, and failed polices.  We simply cannot have that, now can we?


Did Anyone Catch Obama Using Hilary Rosen to Play Good Cop-Bad Cop with Ann Romney?


Well, I get home from work and grocery shopping to see that we had an interesting story unfold.  Hilary Rosen, a Dem operative, slammed Mitt Romney’s wife, Ann, for being a stay-at home mom.  Legal Insurrection has the video…

So then, we have a Democratic operative, belittling the wife of the likely GOP candidate.  On the surface, one might just think that this was a typical Alinskyite smear, and it was.  However, there is another layer to it, but we’ll get to it in a bit.  As for the next move, Ann Romney fired back, and destroyed Rosen…

Then, we see that President Obama chimed in-supporting Ann Romney…

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player
Then, pretty much everyone else in the administration jumped on the “this was bad” bandwagon…

First Lady Michelle Obama also voiced her support for moms with a Tweet, writing “Every mother works hard, and every woman deserves to be respected. –mo.”

And morning TV hosts Mika Brzezinski and Soledad O’Brien condemned Rosen’s comments on their respective MSNBC and CNN shows Thursday, with Brzezinski calling it “an unfortunate statement” and O’Brien slamming Rosen for “pitting women against women.”

And both Obama campaign manager Jim Messina and top adviser David Axelrod tweeted their disapproval of Rosen’s comments. “I could not disagree with Hilary Rosen any more strongly. Her comments were wrong and family should be off limits. She should apologize,” Messina wrote.

“Also Disappointed in Hilary Rosen’s comments about Ann Romney. They were inappropriate and offensive,” Axelrod added.

Is this sounding suspicious to you yet?  Since when does anyone in this administration, especially Axelrod, think that there are any people that can’t be targeted?  And the people from the MSM, defending Ann Romney?  These people ARE the slime machine.  Each holds a PhD in the Alinsky Method, and the smear is a vital tool in their bag of tricks.  Needless to say, this is uncharacteristic-to defend a target.  Also, I think at this point, it is necessary to restate that Rosen is a DEMOCRATIC OPERATIVE.  She works for the DNC, and I seriously doubt that they let anyone go off the reservation.  So, I think there is a plot afoot.  Here it is…

1.  They want to paint Romney as “out of touch.”

2.  They want to perpetuate their “war on women” meme.

3.  They want to attack Ann Romney too, but can’t without looking bad.

4.  They get Rosen to do the dirty deed.

5.  As if it were planned in advance, everyone one in the administration decries this “really bad thing.”

6.  But, the administration gets to portray Ann Romney, who has grown increasingly popular, as a privileged woman with a life of ease, while at the same time, keeping the president, and all of his chief goons, above the fray.  In other words, they launch the attack, and then throw the attacker under the bus.

7.  Even though Rosen is under the bus, for now, they got their attack off, and it is likely their hope that they got a message about her to stick.  Remember, they rely on the uninformed to hear the initial attack, then not hear the rebuttal.

I think the administration played good-cop, bad-cop with Ann Romney.  They got the smear off, and they got to look like the good guys.

We know better.

If I’m right, we’re going to see a lot more of this-with Democratic affiliated individuals and organizations attacking the Romney’s, distracting the public from the economy, and, all the while, the administration claiming to be above it all.

Linked by Theo Spark.  Thanks! 


Apparently Some Polls and More Important Than Others: Harry Reid Thinks 80% of Americans “Meaningless”


We’ve been looking at the selective outrage of the regressives as of late, as well as their (sadly successful) attempts to distract the national conversation away from Obama’s failures.  However, their selectivity also extends to polls.

If you recall back to 2009, during the debate around HR 3200, CBS published the results of a poll, suggesting that 70% of Americans wanted a public opition.  Needless to say, the MSM, lefty sites, and the regressive as a whole sang the virtues of this poll to the heavens themselves (or perhaps they were looking to the opposite direction of heaven).  Then, once people looked at the poll’s internals, it was realized that Democrats were over-sampled over Republicans by an almost 2-1 margin.  In other words, they cooked the books, cheated, and bamboozled.  But, that poll was the gospel truth.

Fast forward to now, and polls have an entirely different meaning.  CBS published the results of a poll, emulating the famous Reagan quote, “Are you better off than you were four years ago?”  Unlike the answer to Reagan’s question, the question under Obama is apparently, “not so much,” as 80% of respondents either indicated, “worse off,” or “no change.”  Since these results are not proclaiming the glorious-unicorn-farting-rainbows-epic-win of the Obama administration, it isn’t quite as “true” as the 2009 poll.  Even Harry Reid thinks so!

(Kindly hit the link to see the video, it doesn’t seem to want to embed here.)

Wow, how times change!


NOW Allowed out From Under Bus to Chime in on Fake Birth Control Debate: Why They Have no Credibility Whatsoever


As we continue to be drug along by the birth control distraction from actual economic issues debate, the National Organization of Women, AKA, the Tammies, have been permitted to re-emerge from under the bus the contribute to the debate massive distraction effort.  The President of that organization recently started speaking out spewing propaganda.  CNS News has more…

Roman Catholic bishops and other religious leaders have failed to keep women from using birth control and now want the “police power of the state” to stop women from doing so, National Organization for Women President Terry O’Neill said Thursday at a gathering of feminist activists.

As a result, O’Neill argued, these religious leaders are now “demanding that the government step in and use the force and power and police power of the state to prevent women from taking birth control because the bishops have failed.”

O’Neill’s remarks came in response to a question from about a large photograph on display at the press conference. It depicted five faith leaders, including a Catholic bishop, who testified at a Feb. 16 House hearinginto the Obama administration’s controversial health insurance mandate. noted that Bishop William Lori was the only faith leader–the others were Jewish, Lutheran and Baptist–who opposed all forms of birth control and pointed out that the hearing was about whether the government mandate violated the free exercise of religion.

OK, this is simple.  No one has advocated for banning birth control.  This is only a matter of breaking religions institutions, as well as distracting from bigger issues.   However, by my estimation, the Tammies have no room to complain about anything.  I have several reasons for saying this:

1.  In 2010, I covered the fact that “rape trees” are being found along the border with Mexico.  The idea is simple, and revolting.  People that are “escorting” illegals across the border, tie women and girls to trees, rape them, and  then leave their panties hanging from the tree as a sort of trophy.  Here is the position of the Tammies on this terrible attack on women…

As you can see, they have nothing to say.  I guess leftist causes such as amnesty takes priority over the rape of girls and women.

2.  OWS Rapes and cover up:  As we have covered extensively, there have been a large number of rapes at #Occupy camps.  Also, underage girls were sold as prostitutes on several occasions.  Then, to complicate the matters, victims came forward and said that the “leadership” of the camps discouraged them from reporting the rapes.  So, we have rapes, child molestation, and a coverup.  The response from the Tammies?

Yes, that’s right.  Rapes, molestation, and a cover up.  But, I’m assuming that since OWS is yet another leftist cause, the Tammies decided to over look this as well.

3.  When was the last time that someone from the Tammies testified before Congress, or had a major media blitz over honor killings, or other dehumanizing aspects of Sharia Law?  I looked, but I couldn’t find any (If anyone can find such an incident, kindly drop it in the comment section).   So, I guess birth control and abortion is more important than women being killed?  Apparently so.

Now, let’s contrast that with the front page of the NOW website, as of about 10:00 PM last night…

Click to embiggen.

So, it seems that the Tammies are rather selective in their outrage.  Religious institutions, especially Christian ones, are to be attacked relentlessly.  Marxist rapists, and men who murder women at the behest of their god…not so much.

So, Ms. O’Neill, I really have to suggest that you crawl back under the bus.  Your entire organization lost it’s credibility during the Clinton administration, and it’s done nothing to earn it back.  As long as NOW is selective in it’s outrage, you’ll be seen as nothing more than political operatives.  I can almost respect an organization that is at the very least, consistent with it’s stated beliefs and goals.  NOW is not.  Stop pretending that you are anything more than political hacks.


Why are the Republicans Allowing the Democrats and MSM Control the Debate?


Why are we talking about contraception?  Why are the talking heads of the MSM (taking notes from Spooky Dude, via Media Matters), being PERMITTED to define what is discussed?

Here is the point:  Obama is a loser on the economy.  He has broken every promise, failed at every proposal, and has, in fact, made things worse.  The economy is THE issue of this election, and everything else is secondary.  Yes we can illustrate that the government, in their effort to get religious organizations to fund abortion (because the pill is just a side issue), is an affront to the First Amendment, but I’m sure that Gingrich, Santorum, or Paul would reverse that on day one, if elected.  But, why waste time discussing condoms or birth control pills when the economy is in the tank, we’ve lost millions of jobs, and the debt will kill the Republic?  That is the issue that we need to be talking about, and the Democrats and MSM wants desperately to avoid, is the economy.

Santorum needs to kill this issue, and he can, by saying the following…

I’m running for President of the United States.  And unlike the current occupant of that office, I will not overstep my Constitutional authority to turn my personal beliefs into de facto laws.  While my family’s religious beliefs mean that we do not use these products, the President of the United States does not have the power to prevent others from making that choice.  The discussion of this topic is nothing more than a way for the Democratic Party, and the media that serves them, from discussing the economy, which is negatively impacting all Americans. 

Frankly, this is more an attack of Santorum than anything else.  The former Senator is taking Obama to task on the economy.  To keep the attention off of that sore spot, Santorum will be asked contraception questions every time the MSM interviews him. To be fair, he did try to point that out last week, but it will take continuous effort to take the MSM off of that line.

Again, the next POTUS, if a Republican, will kill the mandates and such on day one.  Using the economy against Obama is the number one way to get a Republican elected.  See the flow there?  If we allow social issues to dictate the debate, we strengthen the Obama campaign buy burying his biggest failure.


Democratic Strategy for 2012 Revealed? MSM Concentrating on Social Issues, Avoiding Economy


I picked up on this in the CNN debate, and the saw a story from Catholibertarian that shows a possible campaign strategy for 2012.  In both examples, it seemed as if an inordinate amount of time was spent on the social issues; abortion and gay marriage, when compared with the most pressing issue of the day-the economy.  It would be my estimation that more people are concerned with the following:

1.  They don’t have a job.

2.  They fear losing the job they have.

4.  They can’t afford gas for their cars.

5.  Inflation is causing prices to rise across the board.

Again, it’s my guess, but I would think that more people are concerned with what happens at the gas pump or the checkout line than they do about gay marriage.  For the most part, their own lives are being impacted by Obama’s policies, not gay rights.

And there in lies the rub.  It’s increasingly impossible to defend or cover up Obama’s failures (or are they successes?), so the MSM will simply change the subject and discuss something else.  That, of course, will fail.  They can say whatever they want,  ignore anything they don’t want released, or try to spin it, but no matter what-people know what’s wrong then they open their wallets to pay for something.  No amount of lying or obfuscation will change that.

But that won’t keep them from trying.  And, it gives us yet another opportunity to watch them fall on their swords for Obama-and let the entire world know about it.

It ought to be fun.