Socialism Is Expensive. So, Useless People Need To Die! The Elites Understand That

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

The progressive socialists of the world are all about caring, right? They care about women’s rights and the rights of gays, and the rights of ethnic groups, and the rights of the poor. The fact that those are important voting blocks has nothing to do with their caring attitude, does it? So, they want everyone to believe that they care about people as opposed to we knuckle-dragging conservative/libertarians who believe people should take responsibility for themselves. They believe in the collective good and we believe in the good of each individual. They believe in government control of the people and we believe that the people should control the government.

Maybe the best kept secret ever is about those a the head of the progressive socialist food change. The real puppet masters who run organizations like the Trilateral Commission and The Club of Rome and The Council on Foreign Relations with names like Rockefeller and Rothschild and Soros and etc. These are the people using their fortunes to promote “Democratic Socialism” on the world. And, guess what? They don’t give a damn about women’s rights or the rights of gays or of ethnic groups and they damn sure don’t care about the poor. The only thing they care about is themselves. In their opinion, the biggest single threat they see to their desire to have and control even more of the world’s wealth is that there are far too many people on this planet consuming more of its wealth than they are producing. Their number one goal for a long time has been to reduce the world’s population. Of course, to keep the rabble from turning on them they needed to be discreet.

Their first target was the most vulnerable of the human race, the unborn babies. They used their money and influence to promote abortion rights. Not because they care one whit about a woman’s right to control her body; but to reduce the world’s population growth rate. Their plan has met with substantial success. The birth rates in the developed world are plummeting.

After the unborn babies, the most vulnerable group are the elderly. We old folks have more health issues than the young and, therefore, we consume a disproportionate share of the finite medical services that are available. The elites at the top of the progressive socialist food change first installed government controlled health care with its rationing boards (death panels) in Europe and it’s America’s turn to get on board. The goal has nothing to do with providing citizens with better health care or providing health care to the poor. It’s just another tool for reducing the world’s population. America’s elderly will get their first taste of what government health care has in mind for them on January 1; just a few days from now. Doug Ross@Journal says Obamacare has a shocking surprise awaiting our senior on New Years Day. He explains it in comic book fashion:

ObamaCare Death Panel

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

For a more in-depth discussion, you will find an excellent post on the subject over at Bunkerville.

But…but…but say our progressive socialist friends; what about our support of homosexuals? That shows we really care. Of course, the elites want to promote the homosexual life styles. Teaching young children that being gay is cool fits nicely in their plan. Homosexuals don’t reproduce, do they?

I can hear a liberal troll saying: “Hang on there Mr. humble observer of the asylum we all have to live in, we progressive socialists are the ones supporting extended unemployment benefits, welfare programs, and amnesty for illegal immigrants. You knucle-dragging Duck Dynasty types would turn your backs on all of these people. We are the people who care!”

Well, my progressive socialist friends, you may think you are caring; but what have all your “caring” programs done but keep people poor and separated into tribes? Do you really think those puppet masters care about the poor? Be patient. For now as a voting block thy are needed. But, once they have the government so completely to their liking, once they are sure they have total control, they will turn on the poor, the non-productive, the weak with a vengeance. And, they will turn on all of you useful idiots too.

Well, that’s what I’m thinking. What are your thoughts?

Original Post: Asylum Watch

Share

Racial Violence: 71 Year-Old Attacked in Connecticut Park for “being in this park where black children play”

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

It’s Wednesday, and like every day, it’s time for a Racial Violence incident.  And, since it appears to occur daily, we have an abundance of stories to cover.  The latest comes from Connecticut, where an elderly man was not aware that the local park was labeled, “no whiles allowed.”

Imagine that, a convicted felon carrying a gun in Connecticut, even with all those stringent new gun laws. It’s almost as if criminals don’t obey the laws or something.

Police arrested a 35-year-old New Haven man on gun charges among others after an allegedly unprovoked attack on a 71-year-old man.

Jorge DelaPaz was arrested on charges of assault in the third degree of an elderly person, carrying a dangerous weapon, carrying a pistol without a permit, criminal posession of a pistol and interfering with police.

Police say on Sunday, Aug. 25, the elder New Haven man was eating a hamburger in the Goffe Street Park following a Toni Harp mayoral campaign-sponsored event that afternoon when he was approached by the 35-year-old. Police say DelaPaz told the elder white male that he shouldn’t be “in his park where young black kids are playing”. When the man refused an order from DelaPaz to pick up a football, DelaPaz punched the man multiple times in the face, knocking him to the ground. Police say several witnesses supported the victim’s account of the unprovoked attack.

Hey, but at least he wasn’t carrying a gun. That would have been illegal.  Oh wait!

No Jackson,  Sharpton, or anyone else in the racism industry are taking up this cause.  This elderly gentleman did his politically correct duty, and was beaten.  Had he defended himself, he would have been labeled a racist who hunted down that poor, innocent man.

And, of course, this does not fit the narrative, so it won’t be seen in anything outside of the local media.

It’s another day in America, when racial violence, and those that cover it up, are daily institutions.

Share

Nursing Home “Death Panels” Elderly Patient

Share

I don’t know if this is trend, or an aberration, but a nursing home nurse flatly refused a 911 dispatchers order to perform CPR on an elderly woman that had collapsed in that facility.  ABC News has video…

Um, this looks pretty bad. I have heard of a disregard for keeping the elderly alive in nursing facilities, but this is the first solid sign that those reports are true.

Share

Apparently, DHS is Preparing to Shoot Pregnant Women, Children, and the Elderly

Share

There has been a rather disturbing development in the training that DHS is providing.  If it can be said that one trains for the fight one expect to have, it’s pretty clear that DHS plans to shoot pregnant women, children, and the elderly.  For the lead-in to my discussion, Doug Ross (no relation) has more…

Finally, the DHS will put an end to the epidemic of seven-year olds and pregnant women shooting cops. The company says it’s all about, uhm, realism.

The subjects in NMH targets were chosen in order to give officers the experience of dealing with deadly force shooting scenarios with subjects that are not the norm during training. I found while speaking with officers and trainers in the law enforcement community that there is a hesitation on the part of cops when deadly force is required on subjects with atypical age, frailty or condition (one officer explaining that he enlarged photos of his own kids to use as targets so that he would not be caught off guard with such a drastically new experience while on duty).


This hesitation time may be only seconds but that is not acceptable when officers are losing their lives in these same situations.


The goal of NMH is to break that stereotype on the range, regardless of how slim the chances are of encountering a real life scenario that involves a child, pregnant woman, etc. If that initial hesitation time can be cut down due to range experience, the officer and community are better served.

Note that there are other targets featuring elderly people.

Doug discusses this extensively, and he is spot-on.  however, I want to expand on one aspect of this, and it’s the targets themselves.  Historically, soldiers trained on bulls-eye targets for practice.  And, for many of America’s wars, dead soldiers were found with loaded muskets, or, in later wars, unfired rifles-meaning that they never fired once in contact with the enemy.  After researching the matter, it was discovered that practicing on bulls-eyes made for good marksmanship on the firing range, but it did not prepare the soldier to fire on an actual, living human being that meant to kill him.  The solution was simple enough-have the soldiers practice on targets that resembled human silhouettes.  The result were dramatic, and by the time Vietnam came along, most soldiers were firing.  They were prepared to fire on what they were going to face.  it seems like common sense now, but on the battlefield, a moment’s hesitation can be fatal, so preparing people for the targets they will be engaging is only logical.  In other words, there is a REASON to shoot at a specific type of target.

So, if DHS is prepping law enforcement to fire on pregnant women, children, and the elderly, they think that they will be KILLING pregnant women, children, and the elderly.  And, they want officers to be totally prepared to do that without hesitation.  In other words, our government is preparing to make war on all of us-even the most vulnerable of us.

If this doesn’t make the hairs on the back of you head stand on end, there is nothing I can do for you.  You will be surprised, as will be the rest of the useful idiots.

Linked by Daily Pundit-Thanks!!

Share

Warning: ObamaCare Tax Hikes Strike in 2013

Share

My opposition to the Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare)  was based on the fact that it used the state to seize property from citizens and use that property to abort babies and encourage old people to die already all while lessening an individuals choices in their own healthcare. Because of its attack on life, liberty, and property rights, I opposed it, in addition to believing that it was unconstitutional and unaffordable. It remains all of these and more, and in addition billions of very real tax hikes hit a range of Americans starting in 2013, which are going to cost my family several thousand dollars.

From Forbes article In 2013, Millions Of Americans Face Obamacare Tax Hikes:

…On January 1, 2013, a 2.3-percent excise tax on the total revenues of medical-device companies — regardless of whether they turn a profit or suffer a loss — will take effect. The tax will hit everything they sell, from x-ray machines and pacemakers to surgical tools and artificial hips. The levy could extract as much as $29 billion over the next 10 years.

That money will have to come from somewhere; device firms won’t simply swallow the tab. So they’ll likely raise prices for patients and slash their workforces. In fact, economists at the Manhattan Institute project that the tax could eliminate as many as 43,000 jobs — and over $3.5 billion in employee compensation….

…Because of the tax, medical-device firms will also have less money to invest in research and development. My colleague Benjamin Zycher estimates that the industry will scale back investment in new products by 10 percent through 2020. That translates to a $2-billion decrease per year…

…Individuals with annual incomes higher than $200,000 and couples who make more than $250,000 a year will face two new taxes — a 0.9-percent increase in the 1.45-percent Medicare levy on earnings above those income thresholds and a new 3.8-percent tax on investment income. Together, these two taxes are expected to raise about $318 billion over the next decade — roughly half of the law’s new tax revenue.

The structure of these taxes penalizes married couples in particular. According to the New York Times, two unmarried singles who made $200,000 each would not owe any additional Medicare tax. But if they were married, they’d owe $1,350.

Meanwhile, the 3.8-percent tax on unearned income, like capital gains, dividends, and interest, will discourage saving and investment

…The law raises the floor for the deduction of medical expenses, from 7.5 percent of income to 10 percent. So only expenses beyond 10 percent of a person’s income will be deductible. This change could add hundreds of dollars to the tax bills of those struggling with major medical bills.

Obamacare also halves the maximum contribution to flexible spending accounts (FSAs), from $5,000 to $2,500. Many consumers use FSAs to cover routine medical expenses, like vision care, orthodontia, and prescription drugs….

…By neutering FSAs, Obamacare deprives patients of control over their own health care — and puts insurers and government in the driver’s seat. Instead of paying for routine care with pre-tax dollars, individuals will have to purchase expensive insurance that covers routine care. In the end, patients may end up paying more

My family uses our FSA to cover costs of sending our children to school so that we can go to work. We won’t have nearly as much money to work with in 2013- personally this will cost my family between $500-$1000 that will be cut from investments or savings for college for our children- thank you Obarfo.

Although it is possible that Obamacare may result in some good for our nation, we know for a fact that it will result in our nation going farther in debt, will result in jobs being lost, will result in less saving and investment, will result in increased fees and taxes on rich and poor alike, and will result in health care being more expensive for everyone in America.

Possibility of small gain for America, certainty of massive losses for America = Obamacare.

Original Post:  A Conservative Teacher

Share

One Consequence of Forced Union Membership

Share

warning-seiu-members-attending-this-meeting

As the unions fight to keep forced union membership in Michigan, I thought it might be a good idea to re-visit a story we did in early 2011, about how the SEIU got the then Governor of Michigan, to make parents of disabled children members.  Of course, the SEIU got to take dues from them, in exchange for…nothing!

In other words, the SEIU has gotten to take millions of dollars from people that care for their disabled children. Because unions are so super great, that people have to be forced to join them.

Now, let’s flashback to a more current story…

The linked article at the Mackinac Center has even more…

The SEIU has taken over $33 million from the elderly and disabled in Michigan in the last six years through a unionization scheme it orchestrated when Jennifer Granholm was governor. The majority of these people had no idea they were being forced into a union.

When the Michigan Legislature and Gov. Rick Snyder acted to end the scheme, the SEIU took legal action and then spent at least $6 million — money taken from those caregivers without their consent to use it for politics — to try and lock the dues skim into the state constitution: It failed.

Every newspaper in the state editorialized against Proposal 4. The Detroit Free Press called it “easy to dismiss” and The Detroit News said it was a “crass power grab.”

Several families reached out to Michigan Capitol Confidential to tell their stories: The Haynes family, who look after their two adult children who have cerebral palsy; Steven Glossop, who looks after his mother who lives with medical complications following heart surgery and a stroke; the Milliron family, whose adult son Ronnie “cannot walk or talk and is like a 5-month old” needing to be spoon-fed; and Richard Nottage, who looked after his ex-wife for just a few weeks. All of those individuals had some sort of current or previous experience as union members outside of the SEIU.

If Michigan becomes a right-to-work state, no union could ever force a worker to pay dues or agency fees as a condition of employment, and unions would be forced to cater to their member’s needs.

And, as we posted yesterday, union goons are beating people down in order to keep taking money away from the elderly and disabled.  Because, as we all know, forced union membership is a right, and if you disagree, your kneecaps can be broken!

Share

Trayvon Martin Update: New Details, Trashing a Walgreen’s for “Justice”

Share

The Trayvon Martin case is still evolving, as more and more information comes to light.  The reactions to these new tidbits is also telling.  So, let’s take a look at the latest…

It appears that Trayvon had some disciplinary problems in school.  

  • The teen was suspended from school three times
  • He was on suspension when he was shot in February, after officials caught him with a ‘marijuana pipe’ and a baggie with drug residue
  • Trayvon was kicked out of school in October for graffiti after he was allegedly caught with a ‘burglary tool’ and a bag full of women’s jewelry
  • Officials also suspended him once for skipping school and tardiness
  • Tearful parents say their son is now the victim of a smear campaign
  • New poll shows 73 percent of Americans think Zimmerman should be arrested

I really don’t see how any of those items go to whether or not Trayvon was violent, which is at the heart of Zimmerman’s case.  If there were many examples of violence in Trayvon Martin’s past, that would be relevant.  Being suspended for truancy and tardiness and comparing that to allegedly attacking Zimmerman is like accusing a jaywalker of robbing Fort Knox.  The scope of it does nothing for me.

There have been reports that Martin allegedly assaulted a bus drive, but compelling evidence has not come out (or I haven’t been able to find it).

Also, another witness has come forward, and possibly corroborated Zimmerman’s story.

Spike Lee Tweeted the address of Zimmerman, but actually, it was the address of an elderly couple!  

Not only was this sinister… It was the wrong address.
The address Spike Lee tweeted belongs to an elderly Florida couple in their 70?s… Not George Zimmerman, the man who shot Trayvon Martin.
The Smoking Gun reported:

With Twitter and Facebook continuing to explode with posts purporting to contain the address of George Zimmerman, property records and interviews reveal that the home is actually the longtime residence of a married Florida couple, both in their 70s, who have no connection to the man who killed Trayvon Martin and are now living in fear due to erroneous reports about their connection to the shooter.

This is why people should wait before they make judgments, or take action.  Due to his zeal to get Zimmerman killed, Lee has jeopardized the safety of an elderly couple.  That’s real classy, right?

Also, over the weekend, a witness came forth and claimed that Zimmerman did nothing to help Martin after shooting him.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

So, we have more information, but the scene is still muddled.  However, one thing is certain-had Zimmerman followed the instructions of the dispatcher, and had NOT followed Martin, Trayvon would have arrived at home with his Skittles, safe and sound, and Zimmerman would not be in hiding for fear of his life.

Of course, no quest for “justice” would be complete without ransacking a Walgreen’s!


H/T:  The Daley Gator

Share

A Tale of Two Stories: Toddlers Get Screened and Muslims not so Much?

Share

Once again, it’s time to look at the TSA, and how government programs are utterly disconnected from reality.  In order to be PC, the TSA must shake down small children and the elderly, because, as well all know, all suicide bombers are small children or elderly.  And, as Daley Gator shows, small children restricted to wheelchairs are the most dangerous of all…

But, there is a group that our wise and sagely government might excuse from the screening sexual assault.  Our fellow VRWC member, Wyblog, has the details…

Excuse me, is that a bomb in your burqa? Please proceed directly to your gate.

According to Judicial Watch, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napalitano is actually considering waving airport pat downs for Muslim women who consider them offensive.

We mustn’t offend the Muslims!

The demand came last week from the politically-connected Muslim rights organization that serves as the U.S. front for the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas. Calling the searches “invasive” and “humiliating,” the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) advises Muslim women wearing religious head covers known as hijabs to reject full-body checks before boarding planes.

Get over to Wyblog to read the rest, and prepare to slam your head off of something very hard to cope with the complete lack of logic.

And yes, this situation warrants the mirror universe Spock image, because I don’t recognize this world anymore.

Share

Another Proud Leftist Tradition: Staging “Atrocities”

Share

Another of the fine leftist traditions observed at OWS is staging events in such a way to gain public sympathy. We saw this quite early on in their movement, when they were caught on camera planning who would get arrested, and what they would say to the media. Here is an example…

And another…

Additionally, we have seen children placed on the “front lines” in order to serve as human shields…

And, they aren’t afraid to put the elderly in the line of fire…

And even pregnant women are to be sacrificed to the future Communist state…

Why do they do this? They do it to gain public sympathy. If they can parade a public school teacher, a child, an elderly person, or a pregnant lady before the media as “banners,” they can portray themselves as the victims. Because folks, and not to sound callous, but nothing says sympathy like injured children, elderly, and pregnant ladies. It is staged to achieve the desired result-a Kent State event that will make the lawful authorities look heinous, and themselves appear saintly. Of course, their violence, crimes, anti-Semitism, vandalism, arsons, murders, drug dealing, drug overdoses, rapes, child molestation, STDs, and general filth are to be ignored and explained away (see The Proud Leftist Tradition of the Blame Game). For them, like all leftists, what “is” is irrelevant-it’s the narrative that matters.

Come to think of the narrative, here is master propagandist Michael Moore, spinning quite the yarn.

 Moore’s first statement on air was an apology to Wheatley for what had happened to him. “Campus police have turned into armies that have been militarized,” he argued, noting the small size of the protest group– eleven students– and declaring, “the images have resonated around the world in the same way the lone man standing in front of the tanks at Tiananmen Square resonated.” “It is an iconic movement in Occupy Wall Street history,” he continued, “people will remember months and year from now that UC Davis was the moment Occupy Wall Street went to college campuses.”

I think the comparison would be valid if there were tanks running over protesters. I do find it most ironic that Moore would invoke that Tianemenin Square, as the Occupods want a system of government similar to the ChiComs, and the Chinese Students wanted a government similar to ours. But, I’m sure they would explain that glaring inconsistency away.

Another consideration is that since OWS are a collective movement, individuals are unimportant, and very disposable. The organizers seem unafraid to put vulnerable members in danger, because their injuries, and especially their deaths, are useful to the cause. So what if a few (or a lot of ) heads get busted? As long as that is useful to their cause, the pain, or even death, is acceptable. As long, of course, as it isn’t any of the organizers that are hurt, especially when they are in $700 a night hotel rooms.

Sadly, it has been reported that the teen pepper sprayed students in Seattle has had a miscarriage (though there are some inconsistencies in her story). I think that this is a fine time to remind the left of it’s own rules. After all, any feminazi will tell you that a fetus is a parasitic organ, or “tissue mass,” and removing it is no different that having an appendectomy. Also, when you consider that leftist groups help defeat the Personhood Amendment in Mississippi earlier this month, we cannot validate that this was a murder. That fetus was not a person, and could have been dismembered at its mother’s convenience. So, how can they mourn, and capitalize on the death of what they would otherwise compare to a tumor?

I would submit that OWS is a microcosm of the “future society” that they want to establish. And if that is so, and they are willing to sacrifice their own children, elderly, and fetuses, what would they do to your’s, or you? Collectivist movements, as previously noted, do not respect individuals, or their rights-only the collective matters. If you interfere with the smooth oppression of the collective, what are they likely do to you? Given their current rhetoric and behavior, it seems rather chilling.

Since they seem to have a strong allergy to the truth, and that the narrative trumps all other considerations, I think it’s safe to predict that I wouldn’t stand much of a chance in the new order. Then against, most of us won’t. But don’t worry, they’ll stage it all to look really convincing, and sympathetic to their cause-and it doesn’t matter how many old folks or toddlers they need to use, as long as the job get’s done.

Share

Obama's Budget Speech Mentions the Death Panel?

Share

That most depised, and derided, part of the ObamaCare legislation, the Death Panels, are again making waves on the blogs.  Erick Erickson of Redstate and Bunkerville have both taken a look at Obama’s speech, and have came to the conclusion that he had made thinly veiled references to the “death panels.”

I happen to agree.

Here is  a brief excerpt from Redstate…

While everyone else was focused on Barack Obama bashing Paul Ryan, I noticed that he took full ownership of death panels yesterday. Naturally, Obama did not call them death panels. He called them “an independent commission of doctors, nurses, medical experts and consumers.” But his description hits dead on with what his death panels will do.

I would recommend that you head over there and read Erickson’s post.

My take is that Obama is mentioning the IPAB, which is one of those parts of the legislation that we would see “after we pass it.”  Peter Orzag, then the Director of the Office of Management and Budget mentioned it back in April of last year…

 

 

Then, Paul Krugman mentioned the Death Panels while on the This Week program on ABC.

 

Pay particular attention at 4:35, where Krugman mentions “death panel people,” and that the host then mentions IPAB-all in reference to controlling costs.

So, these videos show that what we call the Death Panels is the IPAB, and Obama seemed to directly mention that in his speech.  While not calling it by name, it is clear that this is what he meant.

I also think it’s useful to take another look at the opinions of two administration officials; Donald Berwick, and Ezekiel Emanuel...

The interviewer pointed out: “Critics of CER have said that it will lead to the rationing of health care.” To which Berwick replied: “The decision is not whether or not we will ration care. The decision is whether we will ration with our eyes open.”

OK, here’s the twist; we’ve heard some very similar things before.  Ezekiel Emanuel, Rahm’s brother, is a government adviser on health care.  Here are some quotes from Emanuel.

“Strict youngest-first allocation directs scarce resources predominantly to infants. This approach seems incorrect. The death of a 20-year-old woman is intuitively worse than that of a 2-month-old girl, even though the baby has had less life. The 20-year-old has a much more developed personality than the infant, and has drawn upon the investment of others to begin as-yet-unfulfilled projects…. Adolescents have received substantial substantial education and parental care, investments that will be wasted without a complete life. Infants, by contrast, have not yet received these investments…. It is terrible when an infant dies, but worse, most people think, when a three-year-old child dies, and worse still when an adolescent does.”

Source:  First Things

“Ultimately, the complete lives system does not create ‘classes of Untermenschen whose lives and well being are deemed not worth spending money on,’ but rather empowers us to decide fairly whom to save when genuine scarcity makes saving everyone impossible.”

“When implemented, the complete lives system produces a priority curve on which individuals aged between roughly 15 and 40 years get the most substantial chance, whereas the youngest and oldest people get chances that are attenuated”

So, they will use rationing per population, just like Berwick suggests.  Here’s some more.

“There is a widespread perception that the United States spends an excessive amount on high-technology health care for dying patients. Many commentators note that 27 to 30 percent of the Medicare budget is spent on the 5 percent of Medicare patients who die each year. They also note that the expenditures increase exponentially as death approaches, so that the last month of life accounts for 30 to 40 percent of the medical care expenditures in the last year of life. To many, savings from reduced use of expensive technological interventions at the end of life are both necessary and desirable.”

“Many have linked the effort to reduce the high cost of death with the legalization of physician-assisted suicide. One commentator observed: “Managed care and managed death [through physician-assisted suicide] are less expensive than fee-for-service care and extended survival. Less expensive is better.” Some of the amicus curiae briefs submitted to the Supreme Court expressed the same logic: “Decreasing availability and increasing expense in health care and the uncertain impact of managed care may intensify pressure to choose physician-assisted suicide” and “the cost effectiveness of hastened death is as undeniable as gravity. The earlier a patient dies, the less costly is his or her care.”

Source: What Are the Potential Cost Savings from Legalizing Physician-Assisted Suicide? New England Journal of Medicine, July 1998

So, if were are to assume that Obama would not hire or appoint someone that is against his agenda for heath care, it’s a safe bet that Berwick and Emanuel  do represent the position of the administration.  In other words, heath care rationing is coming, and the elderly are going to pay for that with their lives.

Remember this?

Note: Bunkerville has another related post, Kidney Patients being told to accept death and forgo dialysis

Share

Democrat Canvasser Hits Elderly Woman

Share

After all these years as holding themselves up as a champions of the elderly, the Democrats, or at least one Democrat operative, shows what he really thinks of grannies.

Here’s the evidence.  A canvasser for Frank Pallone (Douchenozzle-NJ), got into an argument with the 68 year-old Treasurer for Pallone’s opponent, Anna Little.

So, I think Pallone needs a new campaign sign.  I took the liberty of making one for him…

H/T: The Resistance

Share

Fear! Made in the USA… Patent Pending…

Share

It is time for the Government to Scare the Old and the Poor half to death. They warned us now watch as the Obama machine ratchets up fear. (play “Jaws” music)

Rahm Emmanuel has said, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.” He then went on to clarify 5 points the government hoped to deal with: Healthcare, Energy, Taxes, Education, and Financial Regulation. Hillary Clinton said the same thing with regard to the climate and if you look at everything this administration has done, it has use fear as its tactic. This government has created a “Crisis” in all of these areas.

We had the crisis of too big to fail? Surely the heavens will fall if… the Banks, GM, Chrysler, Beanie Weenies. (Just kidding about the Beanie Weenies, they are still fine.) Then we had the “these tea-partiers are really scary” and you need to worrrrrry about them. Another goodie is that the Ice Cap is thawing and this signals that the earth will burn up soon if the Oceans don’t flood everything to the Rockies.

Sure, all of these things have something to be said for or about them but the Obama administration does everything by fear. Why? Fear works. Fear makes doing the wrong thing for the wrong reasons somehow look sensible. Fear makes people who claim to have solutions seem desirable. Fear makes you needy and no one likes needy like a politician looking to take over your life.

If this administration continues to follow its pattern it will continue with fear. I think they are ready to go after the Poor and the Elderly. Yep! I think they are going to threaten their checks. Think about it. The government is broke. Just now they are starting to say how broke they are. They need money. Where will they get the money? Taxes! Of course it is taxes but how will they get the people behind the idea of taxes. They will get the people who don’t pay them to vote for them. Let me repeat. The poor and the elderly don’t pay taxes. Only a percentage of those in between pay any. As election time comes and everyone hopes for change they will whip up a fresh batch of fear.

I can hear it all now. “You have to vote for this and that or you won’t get you pills or your check or your check will bounce. You must stop the “Tax Paying Americans” from their wants and needs. If the taxpayers get their way you won’t get your check. Your section 8 housing will dry up and you will die. Oh what can you do? First support Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants. Then they will vote with the poor and the elderly and you can keep all that free money. After all, they have way too much and you have way too little.”

Mark it Down! There will be fear spewing from a TV near you. Fear! Manufactured by the fine folks at Obama Fearmongering.com. Save yourselves and to hell with the rest of America! It’s the Obama way!

Share