Hillary’s New Autobiography: She’s A Lesbian, Obama’s An Alcoholic And She Tells Where Osama Bin Laden’s Body Really Is

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Bill and Hillary at a game

 

Hat/Tip to MRConservative.com here and here.

Fifteen years ago, or even a scant ten years ago, coming out as a lesbian would have been the final nail in the coffin of any candidate for the office of President of the United States.

Today?

Eh, not so much. In fact, it will probably help things for the scandal-ridden Democratic White House hopeful, Hillary Clinton.

If anytime in American history is a good time for someone to come out of the closet, this is the time. Today’s media headlines prove that nothing will assure you greater love, acceptance, and applause from the chattering classes than “bravely” admitting that you’re gay. Make that announcement and all past sins are forgiven – even, perhaps, having been married to the President who signed the “Defense of Marriage Act.” Yes, we’re talking about Hillary Clinton. It appears that, in a shock-filled, soon-to-be published autobiography, she’ll finally acknowledge the truth of all those rumors about her being a not-so-closeted bisexual.

The rumors have been floating around forever, starting with whispers that she “experimented” with lesbian sex while at Wellesley. Such rumors, though, always dogged any rather unfeminine, aggressive woman who graduated from one of those politicized, all-girl colleges back in the late 1960s. It was the era of “burn your bra and try sex with a woman.” Given how generic those allegations were, it was easy for Hillary to shake them off.

And in her upcoming book, she plans to not only reveal her sexual proclivities, but also her version of the Lewinski scandal, Bill’s drinking problem and the real place that Osama bin Laden’s body is.

For those of you who always thought that Hillary was lying about everything, you’re about to be proven right. Moreover, the news is going to come from a very unexpected source: Hillary herself.

The National Enquirer, which has stuck very close to honest reporting since getting burned in a long-ago libel suit, reports that Hillary has decided to stop the lies and tell the truth in an upcoming memoir. Simon & Schuster will pay her $25 million for writing the book, which she hopes will inoculate her 2016 presidential run against any future ugly revelations.

According to the National Enquirer’s source, a person who is allegedly one of Hillary’s close friends, “By writing this tell-all, Hillary will settle old scores and get revenge on her enemies.” Those enemies apparently include Barack and Michelle Obama, since pre-publication rumors have it that Hillary will report about Barack’s drinking problem and the Obamas’ serious marital problems. Hillary also plans to attack Valeria Jarrett, who is Obama’s right-hand woman and the person many believe is the real power in the White House.

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

~~~~~

The book isn’t just about the personal. As part of her attack on the Obamas, Hillary will detail her battles with Valerie Jarrett, “Obama’s brain,” to get a green light on attacking Osama bin Laden. Hillary also plans to detail the fight she had with the White House over Osama’s bloodied, bullet-ridden corpse. Hillary claims that she wanted it returned to the U.S. as proof that he was dead. Obama instead opted for a secret burial at sea (and Hillary promises to reveal the real location) so as not to inflame Muslim sensibilities.

Hillary also intends to admit what many have known for years, but which her friends and ex-lovers have never confirmed: she’s bisexual and has had lesbian affairs. The National Enquirer smugly notes that the memoir will confirm one of its past reports that a veterinarian who came to the White House to treat Socks, the White House cat, caught Hillary in a steamy (and adulterous) embrace with another woman.

~~~~~

For those who still care about Monica Lewinsky, whose sexual shenanigans with Bill almost lost Bill and Hillary the White House, Hillary will finally talk about her version of those events. According to Hillary’s view of things, Monica got word to Hillary that Bill was in love with Monica and wanted to start a family with him (and that she was even planning on getting pregnant without Bill’s consent). Hillary’s response to this news was to throw up in a White House bathroom.

And why is she doing all this now? For two good reasons; first coming out now gets her a big voting block in the Gay Community and second, it deflates any attacks against her, whether they be from the Right or the Left.

Hillary’s plan is that this book, by telling all her dirty little secrets in advance, will clear the way for a 2016 presidential run since none of her opponents will have any dirt to spill on her. The mere fact that she feels compelled to write this book indicates that the Obamas have already gathered this information and, moreover, that they would have used it if Hillary had looked set to sweep the Democrat primaries in 2008. Releasing dirt on his Democrat opponents as a way to clear the field is, after all, vintage Obama.

The MSM will pick this up and run with it, lauding her “bravery” every step of the way instead of asking her why she’s lied all these years. She’s stayed married to Bill and committed adultery on him ad infinitum, which compromises the security of our nation. Anytime an elected official in high office can have something held over their head, then the safety and security of our country is endangered.

Party partisans will no doubt applaud Hillary for her bravery in “coming out” (not that it’s very brave if everyone you care about thinks it’s a wonderful thing to do). It will be more interesting to see how ordinary Americans feel when they discover that the woman seeking the White House has lied to them every step of the way for decades.

.

.

.

 

Share

Help NBC Create Its Next Gay Sitcom Smash!

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

We'll have a gay old time!

We’ll have a gay old time!

Good news for all struggling writers, would-be writers, those curious about writing, those curious about writing but don’t want anyone to find out, those who wrote once but stopped because of shame and those who secretly write every Friday night in the bushes in Central Park.

NBC needs help!  No, not meds for their executives.  NBC wants you to write their next sitcom! (That’s short for “situation comedy” for those of you who aren’t in the business.)

As with anything in life, there are rules.  All NBC asks is that the sitcom “reflect the values of the National Broadcasting Company.” 

And so I now present for my readers who may want to enter this contest the template that NBC would like you to follow.

  • The protagonist of your sitcom is
  1. A possibly gay astronaut
  2. A possibly gay insurance salesman
  3. A possibly gay doctor
  4. A possibly gay fireman
  5. A possibly gay zombie

 

  • Your protagonist’s next door neighbor is
  1. Nosy and always causing trouble, yet lovable and gay
  2. A gay ghost
  3. A gay ghost who is nosy and always causing trouble, yet still lovable
  4. Nosy, unfriendly and possibly straight and hate-filled
  5. A wacky gay inventor who is nosy and always causing trouble

 

  • In the pilot episode your protagonist has to
  1. Help out a friend’s son, who wants to find a way to come out to his parents
  2. Help out a co-worker’s son, who wants to find a way to come out to his parents
  3. Help out a college boy he has never met before who wants to find a way to come out to his parents
  4. Teach a lesson in tolerance to his hate-filled and intolerant straight neighbor
  5. Help out someone online who wants to find a way to come out to their parents

 

  • Throughout the first year of your sitcom your protagonist’s main concern is
  1. Keeping peace among all his wacky, nosy, yet lovable gay neighbors
  2. Rebuffing the advances of a woman in his office
  3. Maintaining a friendly relationship with his ex wife who left him for her female lover
  4. Teaching his hate-filled, straight and religious neighbor about tolerance
  5. Growing as a person as he begins to come to terms with his sexuality

 

  • Your season one cliffhanger will end with
  1. Your protagonist inviting one of his gay neighbors into his bedroom
  2. Your protagonist being invited into his gay neighbor’s bedroom
  3. His hate-filled, straight and religious neighbor being caught with his pants down in his gay neighbor’s bedroom
  4. The zombie apocalypse featuring many lovable, nosy and gay zombies
  5. Your protagonist opting for sex reassignment surgery

 

Well, what are you waiting for.  Get cracking and write NBC’s next hit sitcom!

Original Post: Manhattan Infidel

Share

When Has The Left EVER Been Right?

Share

by

The Adviser

“America’s national security cannot be entrusted to left-wing Democrats.” –– Richard Winchester

“Weakness is policy, and the world’s dictatorships have taken note. The only question now is how much more damage can be done before this disastrous presidency finally comes to an end.” – The Commentator

“Russian troops are invading Ukraine and we have no response. I suppose the Pentagon has more important things to worry about – like hair and makeup for our gay military.” – Allen West

Pick a topic, any topic. Barack Obama and his “progressive” cohorts have been wrong about it.  Global warming? “Arab Spring”? Stimulus? Benghazi? Syria? The “reset” with Russia? Obamacare?  His is a braintrust that has achieved perfection — they’re always wrong.

Why a population of theoretically intelligent citizens continues to trust with their country’s future left-wing politicians who have proved themselves monumentally unqualified to govern is a question best answered by a qualified psychotherapist or two (if such things exist). “You Bet Your Life” should be remembered as a TV show from the ’50s, not a description of America in the second decade of the 21st century.   Even such a formerly staunch Democratic media ally as the Washington Post has come to realize an eternal truth:  Nations will always respect strength and take advantage of weakness.

FOR FIVE YEARS, President Obama has led a foreign policy based more on how he thinks the world should operate than on reality. It was a world in which “the tide of war is receding” and the United States could, without much risk, radically reduce the size of its armed forces … Unfortunately, Russian President Vladimir Putin has not received the memo on 21st-century behavior. Neither has China’s president, Xi Jinping … These men will not be deterred by the disapproval of their peers, the weight of world opinion or even disinvestment by Silicon Valley companies.

Nonetheless, the leftists who have commandeered the federal government are busy stripping our military down to a few bleached and transgendered bones:

Face of the Modern Military: Gay Troops Perform in Drag at Air Force Base

While Russia invades Ukraine, as Islamic terrorist factions plot the West’s destruction, our service members at Kadena Air Force Base in Okinawa, Japan, are being treated to a gay and lesbian drag show … Thanks to the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” the military’s longstanding policy towards gays in the military, the military has seen an influx of gay marriage ceremonies and other events that celebrate the alternative lifestyle.

What Gutting The U.S. Military Means

[…] a combination of the Obama Administration’s policy decisions and budget cuts mandated by the Sequester — the idea for which originated in Obama’s White Housewould leave the U.S. military smaller and weaker than it has been in 74 years. The National Guard will also be reduced. Hagel went on to say that the U.S. would no longer be the world’s foremost military power. He also noted, apparently with equanimity, that reducing U.S. military capacity would likely entail risks to our military personnel and to the nation

 Once the budgetary savagery Hagel outlined for the military is in place, the U.S. will have a Navy with the fewest ships at sea since before World War I, the smallest Air Force ever, and an Army and Marine Corps smaller than at any time since 1940. Weapons systems that would modernize and upgrade our military capability will be canceled, and older weapons systems, such as the A-10, will be eliminated.

In addition to severely reducing America’s conventional military capability, Obama has drastically curtailed the country’s nuclear weapons capacity.

Rank ignorance or malice aforethought?  Allen West has no doubt which:

“Is Obama doing this intentionally? There can be no other answer than yes. Why? Because just like Bill Clinton, spending on domestic welfare nanny-state programs is more important to progressive socialists — after all, they want power, they need votes.”

Obama promised his supporters “fundamental transformation,” and he’s providing it.  Even Democrats will live to regret it.

Related Stories:

PTG

Original Post:  Be Sure You’re Right, Then Go Ahead

Share

Gay Rights Supporter Wants to ‘Target,’ and “Get Rid of,” Those That Disagree With Gay Agenda

Share

hypocrite

The forces of “tolerance” are at it again.  We’ve covered the hateful rhetoric and efforts to ruin those that oppose the gay rights agenda.  Of course, they don’t target Muslims, but I think we know why that is.  But, at any rate, Robert Stacy McCain has more on the latest, when gay rights supporter, Chloe Nelson, opined on a video of controversial pastor, Scott Lively…

…LGBT activist named Chloe Nelson posted this comment on Facebook:

LGBT_GET_RID_BASTARDS

It’s time that the LGBT community forms a new organization that targets homophobes, bigots, religious zealots, religious fanatics, and all other assholes who are against equality, and human and civil rights for all people.
By targeting these bigots, and publishing every little detail of their sex lives, or personal lives, taking pictures through their windows, and getting the pics out on the internet, showing every little thing that they do, including how they wipe their asses when in the bathroom, or for that matter if they’re wiping their asses in the kitchen — we’ve got to catch it on camera.
The time to just sit back and take it, are over with for the LGBT community. We need to get rid of bigots like these homophobic religious assholes, and if it means exposing every little thing about them, then that’s what we need to do.
We need to start making their lives a living hell by constant observation and publishing pics and articles every time they fart, or spit, or even look cross-eyed. It’s obvious these bigots only understand one thing, and that is persecution, discrimination and bigotry.
Here come the LGBT bigots, gonna prey on the religious zealots, fanatics, and bigots who think their shit don’t stink, and think they can control everyone else’s life.
LET’S GET RID OF THESE BASTARDS ONCE AND FOR ALL!!!!

Now, if a Conservative said that about gays, it would really be a controversy.  But, since this screed is directed at Christians and Conservatives, there is no problem.  Bullying isn’t bullies when they bullies wear rainbows.  Stalking Christians is legal, and correct.  I could go on, but this hypocrite’s words speak for itself.  Tolerance only applies to it, and anyone who disagrees needs to be destroyed.

But just remember, we’re the hateful ones!

Note that Jeanette Runyon found this peaceful and tolerant post.  If you recall, Jeanette bravely stood up to stalking by #FreeKate supporters.  In fact, one stalker still devotes large amounts of time to posting about Jeanette, unless, that is, they aren’t doxing nine year olds on twitter.

Share

Sandy Hook Shooter, Adam Lanza, Had a Movie About ‘Man-Boy’ Love, Documents About ‘The Rights of Pedophiles’

Share

Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook school shooter, had some sickening material on his computer.  Aside from materials on mass murders, there was a disturbing set of materials on “Man-Boy love,” and the “rights of pedophiles.”  The Other McCain has more…

This might give gay pedophiles a bad reputation:

The state’s attorney report on the horrific murders at the Sandy Hook Elementary School by shooter Adam Lanza found no “conclusive motive” for his actions but did document unsettling facts about the 20-year-old killer, including computer files he kept on the rights of pedophiles, a movie about man/boy love, instant messages concerning “homosexual fantasies,” numerous mass murder documents, and a computer game entitled “School Shooting.”

Jammie Wearing Fools: “Well, this will probably be the last you ever hear about Adam Lanza from the mainstream media.” Indeed.

I would have to agree with the assessment.  This seems to identify Adam Lanza as not only gay, but  pedophile, interested in “man-boy love.”

The full report is available via the State of Connecticut.

Share

Private School Teacher Fired for Being Straight??

Share

Apparently, tolerance is a one way street to certain groups.  It will not be good to be straight in a gay world.  Just ask Gregory Kenney, who taught at the Trinity School.  

A married, heterosexual gym teacher at a tony Upper West Side private school was fired because his lesbian supervisor disapproved of his “traditional family status,” the canned teacher claims in a new Manhattan lawsuit.

Krieger allegedly forced him to coach three sports, even though his contract only required him to join two teams, according to his reverse discrimination suit.

When he complained that the extra responsibilities interfered with his family obligations Krieger allegedly told him, “We all make choices,” the suit says.

After Kenney told Krieger that he couldn’t keep working nights and weekends, she reported him to the headmaster “while a single, female teacher faced no scrutiny when she refused to coach a third season.”

Kenney claims the allegedly biased athletic director “routinely favored other single, younger females without children and discriminated against [him] because of his gender, sexual orientation, ‘traditional family status,’ and age.”

“On at least one occasion Kenney was dissuaded from attending social events with his peers because he was a heterosexual, married male with children, who wouldn’t fit in with [Krieger’s] ‘culture.’”

He says three other married coaches with young children were also sacked. Kenney was replaced by a gay female, according to court papers.

Hmmm. Seems the gay rights crowd is awfully silent, as is the ACLU, and pretty much any other liberal organizations.  They must think that this is OK; after all, he is straight.

Share

#FreeKate Update: Victim Tried to Break Off Relationship, Kaitlyn Hunt ‘Wouldn’t Let Her,’ Described to Have ‘Problem With Lying’

Share

For the latest post in our series based on the information acquired via a FOIA request filed by Jeanette Runyon, we take a look into the nature of Kaitlyn Hunt’s relationship with her victim.  It seems that the victim tried to break off the relationship, but Kaitlyn wasn’t willing to do that.  I will be quoting two sources; Detective Shepherd’s report, and the text messages exchanged between Kelly Hunt Smith, and her daughter’s victim.  Please note that since the victim is a minor,  I will minimize the input from her part of the conversation to protect her from undo scrutiny, as well as from retaliation from the Hunts, or their supporters.

In essence, from two sources, we find that the victim tried to break off the relationship at some time prior to January 9, 2013, and Kaitlyn Hunt threatened to openly disclose that the victim was a lesbian.  Note that this come over one month before the arrest of Kaitlyn Hunt.  First, here is a screen capture from Detective Shepherd regarding a talk he had with the Captain of the Basketball team…

investigation no gay bias5

As you can see, the victim (indicated by her initials, C.S.) was reported as trying to break off the relationship.

Kiandrea told me that C.S. told her she attempted at one point to break it off with Kaitlyn.  However, Kaitlyn would not let her. Kaitlyn threatened to tell people about her sexual orientation.

Now, here are a serious screencaptures of the January 9, 2013 conversation between Kelley Hunt Smith, and the victim of her daughter…

cs tried to leave

khs victim 10

khs victim 10

What do U mean? Uve tried to break it off with her, and she wouldn’t let u? Kelley Hunt Smith

She threatened to put all the stuff we had out.  So. Like I’m not with all that. The victim of Kaitlyn Hunt

In this interaction, Kelley Hunt Smith does provide the victim with more information about her daughter…

kate lies

kate lies 2

Sweetie I hate to tell u this, but Kate has some issues, especially with lying.

Kate knows I have my concerns with it. You are very young. I don’t know if your parents and an family knew about this or approved, which obviously they don’t. 

I think what we are starting to see is that a young and vulnerable teen was taken in by an adult that has, “some issues, especially with lying.”  When the younger teen tried to break off the relationship, the adult threatened to make known that the young girl was a lesbian.

And what else did Kelley Hunt Smith think of the relationship between Kaitlyn and the victim?

cant understand what love is

Ur both young and at your age can’t understand what love is.

Just to add to the argument, let’s review some of the information that was uncovered in the Notification of Violation of Pretrial Release…

“Keep the f*ck quiet.”

“if my mom finds out we’re talking, I’m blaming it on you.”

“F*ck you…You’re stupid…you want me to go to jail…you’re such a messed up person…you snitched on me.

Kaitlyn Hunt, to her victim.

Does this not run completely counter the the assertion of #FreeKate supporters, like Rachael Carson Zerbe, who claimed that this was nothing more than a “loving relationship” between “peers?” Does “love” mean threatening to “out” someone if they leave a relationship?  Does it mean sending verbally abusive texts?  Or, was this an exploitative relationship, based on lies and threats?  I think the evidence, and the reaction Kelley Hunt Smith, would suggest that.

But there is more…

cant understand what love is2

 

Not to mention that your both very young to label yourselves sexually.  U may grow up to date guys, get married, and have kids. If u truly feel that you bi or a lesbian those are thoughts and feelings u should share with your parents.

Does this sound like a parent that was ready to go to war over this being “anti-gay bias?”   It seems that she believes that they are not set in their sexuality.

But was the victim a lesbian at all?

I don't like girls

 

 But, what I’ve tried to teach her is that lying always leads to something bad.  Kelley Hunt Smith

smh & this is.  I’m so sorry  I don’t like girls.  I guess I got wrapped up in Kate & what she would say.  Aha. Wow. yeah.  Victim of Kaitlyn Hunt

Once again, I think that we are seeing a very young girl who fell victim to manipulation at the hands of an adult.  She indicated in the above comment, as well as in another (unpublished one), that she isn’t a lesbian.   However, we see that Kaitlyn hunt was able to manipulate her into at least acting like one.

And, But, what I’ve tried to teach her is that lying always leads to something bad. could be an epitaph for this entire case.

For me, this interaction very strongly suggests that Kaitlyn Hunt was engaged in  a verbally abusive and manipulative relationship with a young teen.  The young teen was confused and easily manipulated by the older, more savvy adult, who in the words of her own mother, had problems with lying.

It also raises the question of what happened to the Kelley Hunt Smith, who in this entire interaction, was rather nurturing to the young victim?  Why did she go from being supportive and kind to this?

James and Laurie Smith wouldn’t give up. They were out to destroy my daughter, they feel like my daughter “made” their daughter gay. They are bigoted, religious [zealots] that see being gay as a sin and wrong, and they blame my daughter. Of course I see it 100% different. I don’t see or label these girls as gay. They are teenagers in high school experimenting with their sexuality, all teens do it in one form or another. They are teens, its healthy and normal. And even if their daughter is gay, who cares, she is still their daughter. (Emphasis added)

And why does Kelley Hunt Smith talk about the victim being “gay” when the victim herself told her that she was not?  Why did Kelley Hunt Smith go from indicating that they were too young to label themselves sexually, to stating that the young victim was gay?

The questions are starting to get a bit numerous, aren’t they?

In a sense, this post does leave us with  a number of unanswered questions.  However, it does show us that the relationship between Kaitlyn Hunt and her victim was abusive and controlling, and when the victim tried to leave, Kaitlyn Hunt threatened to “tell people” about her “sexual orientation.” And, if homosexual behavior is, in the words of Kelley Hunt Smith, “healthy and normal,” why did her daughter threaten her young victim with exposing that very “healthy and normal” behavior?  Why the inconsistency?  Or was it just a case of an adult using power and control to manipulate a young teen into staying in a relationship?  You can be the judge of that.

While we know more, I have a hunch that this is only the tip of the iceberg.  But, unless other legal developments come about, we will likely not know.  What we are left with is a traumatized victim and family, whose only desire was to protect their young daughter from an adult that wouldn’t let go.

For now, this is the last post regarding the information obtained in the FOIA request filed by Jeanette Runyon.   As always, should something newsworthy, such as more harassment, arrests, bullying, “pretend IRL stalking,” new evidence emerges, or legal developments occur, we will revisit the case.   In other words, this story is alive as the Hunts and their supporters make it.

Also, I will make the same offer that the website Support Honesty makes.  If there is any kind of actual documentation that proves anything in these last three posts incorrect, I will happily post it to correct the public record.  However, “documentation” means actual documentation, not, “because I said so.”

As always, we need to thank Jeanette Runyon, who has born the brunt of much abuse at the hands of #FreeKate supporters.  From openly plotting to get her banned from Twitter via false spam reports, to one even pretending to stalk her IRL, Jeanette came through under pressure.  Also, we need to thank Robert Stacy McCain, of The Other McCain, whose extensive Twitter readership, his blog, Viral Read, and an American Spectator post all supported the release of this information.  We also need to acknowledge the Smith family, that dug in and stayed the course for the sake of their daughter.  There are a host of other bloggers and individuals to thank and acknowledge, and I will do that in a future post.

Share

Soldiers Threatened if They Contribute to Christian or Tea Party Groups

Share

The smears and “war” against the Tea Party has been going on since the inception of that entity.  The “war” against God via attacking the followers of his Son, is picking up steam under Obama.  Poor Richard’s News has more…

from Washington Times:

Don’t donate to the tea party or to evangelical Christian groups — that was the message soldiers at a pre-deployment briefing at Fort Hood said they received from a counter-intelligence agent who headed up the meeting.

If you do, you could face punishment — that was the other half of the message, as reported by Fox News.

The briefing was Oct. 17, and about a half-hour of it was devoted to discussion about how perceived radical groups — like tea party organizations and the Christian-based American Family Association — were “tearing the country apart,” one unnamed soldier said, to Fox News.

Among the remarks the agent allegedly made: Military members who donate to these groups would be subject to discipline under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the soldier reported.

Liberty Institute has stepped in to investigate. Michael Berry, one of the nonprofit’s attorneys, said he has been advising the soldier about his options — but that in the meanwhile, he said the American public should be on guard.

“The American public should be outraged that the U.S. Army is teaching our troops that evangelical Christians and tea party members are enemies of America and that they can be punished for supporting or participating in those groups,” Mr. Berry said, in Fox News. “These statements about evangelicals being domestic enemies are a serious charge.”
The solider said he was worried about getting in trouble for speaking of the incident to the press.

read the rest

The systematic and “fundamental transformation” of the US Military is accelerating.  There has been a “purge” of the officer corps.   Homosexuals may now openly serve.  And now, Christians, or American soldiers that openly believe in human freedom, are being systematically targeted for punishment.  Christians that share their faith are threatened with Court Martial.

That begs the question, why ban morality from the military?  I would also add, what happens to a military that lacks morality?  I think the third question answers the first two; what happens to civilians when the military lacks morality?  Here is a possible answer, from the proposed movie, “Gray State.”

You see, the “modern” left has always feared and loathed the military.  Ideally, the US Military represents what is good about the US, and the fact that our military cannot be used against the people is a core belief.  A moral institution cannot easily be used to commit evil.  That might explain the left’s hate for it.  However, what if you change the “culture” of the military?  If you eliminate the Christian influence from the military, and teach the troops that Christians are evil, and that freedom loving Americans are their enemy, it’s a significant step towards changing that “culture.”  Some might think that since the military has most always been  a more “conservative” entity  might scoff, but what if ever soldier recruited for the next several years are met with a wall of indoctrination that what good is evil, and what evil is good?  What if they are taught that Americans that have guns, believe in the Constitution, and fly the flag are their enemies, and want to kill them?  What if Christians that join or  punished for their faith, or simply drummed out?  What if the officers that would fight against that are fired, and replaced with one with the “preferred” belief system?

I know that some are going to ask about the condition of my tin-foil hat.  However, we have seen this before.  History is a cruel taskmaster, and we know where this goes.

Share

Manhattan Infidel Presents the Democratic Party’s Declaration on Education (Part I)

Share
We must indoctrinate our youth to the glory of the state

We must indoctrinate our youth to the glory of the state

Being an insatiable alcoholic reader I often find myself sleeping until 2 pm and then vomiting browsing the web looking for documents relevant to this blog.  Accordingly it gives me great pleasure to present to my readers a document I found on the Democratic National Committee’s website entitled “Declaration on Democratic Education.”

Preface

The Sacred Democratic Party has given careful consideration to the paramount importance of education.  In fact the education of youth and the continuing education of adults is rendered more necessary by the existence of Fox News and conservative bloggers.

For her part Holy Mother Democratic Party in order to fulfill the mandate she received from her founders to announce the mystery of statism is under an obligation to promote the welfare state.

Accordingly the Sacred Democratic Party hereby promulgates some fundamental principles concerning indoctrination of Democratic youth.

  1. All men, woman and transgendered  of whatever race, condition or age, unless they are white men of northern European origin who don’t work in Hollywood and aren’t millionaires have an inalienable right to Democratic indoctrination. True eductation is directed towards the formation of the human person and of that society to which he belongs.  Democratic tradition calls this the social contract.
  2. As they grow older they should receive a positive education in matters relating to sex.  Particularly questions like:
  • Is ten years old too early to masturbate
  • I’m 12 and I think I’m gay.  Can I have sex with an older man just to try it out?
  • I heard prostitution is empowering. 
  • I want to grow breasts and become a transsexual.  Why won’t Republicans let insurance companies cover this?
  • How do I start a career in porn?
  • My teacher wants me to touch his thing.
  • Oral sex not dodge ball for gym class!
  • My 14 year old girlfriend is pregnant and my parents won’t drive us to the abortion clinic.  What are my options?
  • They didn’t tell me in health class if swallowing is good for me.  Do you have any documentation on this?
  • I play trombone in the band.  Should I switch to a rusty trombone?
  • Is bestiality an option?
  • Is giving blow jobs for milk money an example of the social contract?

Accordingly  the Sacred Democratic Party affirms that children and teenagers have the right to be stimulated in the classroom by their teachers. We earnestly request that all those in charge of education ensure that young people are never deprived of the opportunity to express themselves sexually.

Such an education ensures that teens are introduced to their sexual organs and the sexual organs of their friends and teachers.  They will also benefit by being exposed at an early age on how to best achieve orgasm.

Moreover conscious of their sexuality they should learn to give witness to Democratic values and contribute to the growth of the Democratic Body.

End of Part I

Original Post: Manhattan Infidel

Share

A Tale of Two Stories: Pro-Gay Radio Host Abuses Christians, Gay Rights Crowd Ignores Muslims KILLING Gays

Share

I personally find it curious that while the gay rights crowd loves going after  Christians, they leave others off the hook.    Here is a list of stories compiled here over the last few years…

Great Moments in Civil Discourse: Gays Insult, Make Death Threats Against a 14 Year-old Sarah Crank

Chick-fil-A Quick Hits: TV News Team Refuses to Cover Appreciation Day, Media Harasses During Protests, Protests are Fail, but Manage Vandalism

Chik-Fil-A Being Punished for Being Christian, Just as Predicted

Tolerant Left Vandalizes Church in the Name of Tolerance

Great Moments in Civil Discourse: Best not Believe in the Bible, Ya Hear?

“Tolerance and Diversity” on Display: Biblical Stance on Homosexuality Bullying?

Chick-Fil-A Supports Family Values: How Long Before They are Punished for it?

From The Front Lines of the Culture Wars: Student Disciplined for Thinking Homosexuality is Wrong

Fascist Friday (Wednesday Edition): Losing Your Religion, or Else UPDATED

Czar Wars: Kevin Jennings, Gay Bars and Fighting Back

Czar Wars: Kevin Jennings, This is What He Thinks Your Children Should be Reading

Fascist Friday A Day Late: “Tolerance and Diversity” Goes to Court?

Fascist Friday: The Saga Continues…

So, there is a good bit there.  I have more, but that would be overkill.  To summarize, the gay rights crowd uses “tolerance and diversity” to smear, attack, intimidate, vandalize, and attempt to silence any one who disagrees with them.  For a more current example, let’s see what a pro-gay radio host does…

Of course, what Signorile is saying is that one can’t reject what one sees as a sin without hating the sinner. But that isn’t what any western religion teachers. Christianity, even Mormonism teachers believers to reject the sin, but love the sinner. And when that “sinner” is flesh and blood, that tenet is all the more important.

But this isn’t good enough for the militant Signorile. Says the radio talker:

Those parents who do not move on the issue, who reject their children, either by literally throwing them out of their homes or by saying, “I love you, but I don’t accept your ‘lifestyle,’” are putting themselves above their children. For young people in that situation, living as second-class citizens in their own families and fooling themselves into thinking that their parents love them (because they so much want that love from their parents) while allowing their parents to quietly condemn them each and every day, even as they grow into adulthood, the rejection eats away at their self-esteem.

To Signorile, this all means that homosexual kids must reject their own parents if those parents don’t fully toe the line presented by the militant homosexual lobby.

And this…

Can’t you just feel the tolerance oozing from this?

OK, you get a sense of the problems. Christians are mean, and pick on the poor gays, so they have to be silenced, or even die. Of course, all the nastiness is in the name of “tolerance,” mind you. But, in the midst of all of this, there is a disconect-and it’s a big one.  You see, Christians don’t kill gays.  They simply try their best to be Godly.  However, there is another group that DOES kill gays, but I don’t see the Gays rights crown going after them.  They are the Muslims, and their stated goal is to convert the world at gun point.  And, there is only a few places for gays in their world.  Mr. Conservative has coverage of the ways in which gays are welcome in a Muslim world…

WARNING: DISTURBING CONTENT AHEAD!

It’s seems that, in certain quarters of Western countries, Muslims are now using violence against gays to impose sharia law. The photo at the top of this post shows a French man who walked through a Muslim suburb outside of Paris, arm in arm with this boyfriend. Al Jazeera reported that

A man in Paris, France was reportedly beaten for walking with arm in arm with his boyfriend Olivier early Sunday morning. Wilfred de Bruijn, a French resident, says he was assaulted while walking in Paris’ 19th arrondissement. He says he sustained several injuries, including a missing tooth, broken bones, and fractured pieces of bone in his skull. He posted a photo of his wounds on his Facebook page with the caption “Sorry to show you this. It’s the face of homophobia.”

It’s important to note here that de Bruijn’s story has not yet been corroborated.  Equally importantly, the majority of Muslims either do not support this extremism or, if they do, nevertheless do not act upon it. Still, there are so many Muslims pouring into the West that, even if a percentage of them believe in raping and brutalizing women and gays, they put a great deal of pressure on the Western societies that they inhabit.

This is one way to welcome gays to Shari-ah law…

gay man beaten in Paris

Cause we know that Christians do this sort of thing all the time, right?  They come barging right out of church and attack the first gay they see, right?  OH wait!

And, not to leave anything else out, here is option number two for gays under Shari-ah law…

Or this…

Now, Gays will publish maps with the names and addresses of Christians, so they can be harassed and threatened. But I see no similar behaviors against Muslims, who REALLY KILL GAYS! No lists of the Muslins that call for the death of Gays, or those that call for Shari-ah law, which would mandate that Gays be executed. Nope, they’ll just pick on the Christians.

I wonder why that is?


You can support the CH 2.0 with your Amazon purchases!

Share

My Exclusive Interview with Lassie

Share

Lassie the gay collie

Following up on yesterday’s post where I revealed to my readers the news that Lassie had been arrested for suspicion of setting the Colorado wildfires, today I have the privilege of interviewing the out-on-bail Collie.

MI:  Good afternoon Lassie.

Lassie:  Good afternoon. It’s good to be here.  I appreciate the opportunity to get my story out.

MI:  As a condition of your bail you have to wear a paw-monitoring bracelet. How is that for you?

Lassie:  It’s a bitch but it does have benefits.  The ladies dig it.  They say it makes me seem dangerous.

MI:: Interesting.  So.  You’re gay right?

Lassie:  Huh?

You can’t prove I did nuttin’!  Come on look at me.  Kids love me!

MI:  Well I heard today that a major Hollywood superstar was coming out of the closet.  And there is no one bigger than Lassie.

Lassie:  That was Anderson Cooper you moron.

MI:  Anderson Cooper gay?  Yeah right.  Next thing you’ll tell me Ricky Martin is gay.

Lassie:  He is. They both are!  They are both gay!

MI:  Do you hang out with them? Maybe go to gay socials together?

Lassie:  What the hell are you talking about?  And what the hell is a gay social?

MI: You tell me.  You’re the gay one.

Lassie:  For the last time I’m not gay!  Now can we talk about the charges against me?

MI:  So you’re not gay?

Lassie:  Well if you fill up my food dish I might sniff your groin.  But that’s simply Quid pro quo, not a lifestyle thing.

MI: I see.  Not a lifestyle thing.  So I’ll ask you again.  Are you, Lassie, gay?

Lassie:  No!

MI:  No?  What about this photo?

A totally ungay photo of Lassie

MI:  Or this one?

Another ungay photo of Lassie

Lassie:  These are stills from movies I did.  My character is beloved by children.  I help them.

MI:  Right.  It’s simply the character you were playing.  Or might one say you were playing yourself.  Lassie, the gay dog?

Lassie: God you are a f#%**g idiot!

MI:  I don’t know.  I think my questions have been very nuanced.

Lassie:  Who did you say you were again?

MI:  I’m the Manhattan Infidel.  I have a very popular blog.

Lassie:  You told me you were with the New York Times! And you’re nothing but a blogger?

MI: Sometimes in the pursuit of a big story one must resort to subterfuge.

Lassie:  Get the hell out!  I swear I am so close to biting you in the groin!

MI:  Interesting that you would want to attack my groin.  And you insist you’re not gay?

Lassie:  That’s it.  This interview is over.  You’re a motherf#$## idiot.

And so ended my interview with the recently out-of-the-closet gay dog Lassie.  It was a difficult story to break but I, the Manhattan Infidel, will spare no pains to bring the facts to my readers.

Original Post:  Manhattan Infidel

Share

Tolerant Left Vandalizes Church in the Name of Tolerance

Share

Our tolerant leftist friends have brought their tolerance to all parts of the globe, by violence, if necessary.  For the latest example, take a look at latest example, via Speak Up…

A Portland, Oregon, campus of Mars Hill Church was recently vandalized by a group of homosexual activists.  The group smashed nine windows with rocks, including two stained glass windows that were over 100 years old.  Normally vandalism like this is anonymous, but this vandalism was meant to send a message.  The vandals actually sent an email to a local TV station claiming responsibility for the vandalism and stating that they vandalized the church because “Mars Hill is notoriously anti-gay and anti-woman.”  But there is nothing unusual about Mars Hill’s view on homosexual behavior and the church even holds itself out as simply believing what the Bible says about homosexuality.

So, let’s make sure that we make this clear.  The left is tolerant, and so tolerant, that they will destroy the property of anyone that disagrees with them.  After all, it’s the tolerant thing to do!

Share

Muslim Assaults Atheist in Pennsylvania: Intense Irony Ensues

Share

I usually don’t cover Islamic atrocities. or even malfeasance.  After all, there are other bloggers out there that do that a great deal, and far better than I ever could.  However, I saw a story today that twists reality into a delicious irony sandwich.

Here’s the set up:  During a Halloween Parade, Atheists dressed as parodies of religious figures.  One was a zombie Pope.  Another, who is the sad subject of this story, dressed as zombie Mohammed.  That prompted a quick and violent reaction from a local resident, who is a Muslim.  For the rest of the story, check this out, via Weasel Zippers…

Via Opposing Views:

The Pennsylvania State Director of American Atheists, Inc., Mr. Ernest Perce V., was assaulted by a Muslim while participating in a Halloween parade. Along with a Zombie Pope, Ernest was costumed as Zombie Muhammad. The assault was caught on video, the Muslim man admitted to his crime and charges were filed in what should have been an open-and-shut case. That’s not what happened, though.

The defendant is an immigrant and claims he did not know his actions were illegal, or that it was legal in this country to represent Muhammad in any form. To add insult to injury, he also testified that his 9 year old son was present, and the man said he felt he needed to show his young son that he was willing to fight for his Prophet.

The case went to trial, and as circumstances would dictate, Judge Mark Martin is also a Muslim. What transpired next was surreal. The Judge not only ruled in favor of the defendant, but called Mr. Perce a name and told him that if he were in a Muslim country, he’d be put to death. Judge Martin’s comments included,

“Having had the benefit of having spent over 2 and a half years in predominantly Muslim countries I think I know a little bit about the faith of Islam. In fact I have a copy of the Koran here and I challenge you sir to show me where it says in the Koran that Mohammad arose and walked among the dead. I think you misinterpreted things. Before you start mocking someone else’s religion you may want to find out a little bit more about it it makes you look like a dufus and Mr. (Defendant) is correct. In many Arabic speaking countries something like this is definitely against the law there. In their society in fact it can be punishable by death and it frequently is in their society.”

This is ironic and instructive.   And when you can combine fun with learning, it’s a beautiful thing.  First off, if the attacker was a Christian, and the judge was also Christian, would he have gotten off free?  I don’t think so, because Christians believe in law and order, and generally eschew violence.  And, come to think of it, it might have been at least a blurb on the national news, as it makes Chrsitians look bad.  However, since the attacker is a Christian, there is going to be a lot of silence on this story.

Secondly, Atheists, Feminazis, homosexuals, Muslims, and a host of other groups attack Christianity on a regular basis.  They proudly and loudly do so, and are rather persistent at it.  However, those same groups seem to shy away from attacking Muslims.  Of course, the common answer is simple.  A Christian, when attacked, is instructed by scripture to turn the other cheek, and pray for their enemies.  Muslims, on the other hand, are instructed to kill everyone who opposes them.  And, the judge is correct, Mr. Perce would likely be killed for his prank in a Muslim country.   The answer then?  Christians are a soft target, they aren’t likely to fight back.  Islam is a rather violent religion, and their Koran demands the death of infidels.

Mr. Perce was assaulted by one Muslim.  What if there had been twenty?  What if there had been one hundred?  And, what if there were a Muslim judge to declare them all innocent for his eventual murder?  This is something that our Atheist friends might want to consider as more Muslims enter this country, and clearly don’t “get” the religious freedom, or the freedom of speech, that our Constitution protects.

In the end, I cannot take the atheists, feminazis, gays, and other critics of Christianity, at all seriously.  They claim that Christianity is oppressive, yet they mostly ignore that Muslims kill apostates or infidels, commit honor killings of female family members, and hang homosexuals. But, we don’t see them being protested.  We don’t see demonstrations outside of Mosques.  Nothing.  If they were serious about their issues, they would take on the people that would kill them, rather than the ones that would pray for them.  They are cowards and hypocrites, and are not worthy of the tiniest bit of credibility.

Share