Sandy Hook Shooter, Adam Lanza, Had a Movie About ‘Man-Boy’ Love, Documents About ‘The Rights of Pedophiles’

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook school shooter, had some sickening material on his computer.  Aside from materials on mass murders, there was a disturbing set of materials on “Man-Boy love,” and the “rights of pedophiles.”  The Other McCain has more…

This might give gay pedophiles a bad reputation:

The state’s attorney report on the horrific murders at the Sandy Hook Elementary School by shooter Adam Lanza found no “conclusive motive” for his actions but did document unsettling facts about the 20-year-old killer, including computer files he kept on the rights of pedophiles, a movie about man/boy love, instant messages concerning “homosexual fantasies,” numerous mass murder documents, and a computer game entitled “School Shooting.”

Jammie Wearing Fools: “Well, this will probably be the last you ever hear about Adam Lanza from the mainstream media.” Indeed.

I would have to agree with the assessment.  This seems to identify Adam Lanza as not only gay, but  pedophile, interested in “man-boy love.”

The full report is available via the State of Connecticut.

Share

Liberal Professor Engages in Projection: Blames Mass Murder on “White Privilege”

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Imagine, if you will, that you are a liberal regressive, and want to keep your client classes on the government plantation.  You don’t want them to become independent, as they would then no longer need you.  If they don’t need you, you can’t control them, you can’t manipulate them, and they won’t vote for you or the candidate of your choice.  Your adversary is then Western Culture, and the idea that one can better themselves with work and that everyone has opportunity.  To combat that, you need to negate those ideas, and tell your client classes that no matter what they do, they cannot succeed.  So, you create an non-existent construct that negates  the narrative of self sufficiency.  A perfect example of such a construct is the fallacy of “White Privilege.”  This intellectual poison pill explains away failure, and kills initiative by suggesting the all of society is built exclusively for white people, and people of other races cannot succeed.  To combat this mythical issue, whites must be systematically discriminated against, and be blamed for every single problem that exists in society.  It’s the perfect liberal boogie man.  You get to keep your people in intellectual chains, while keeping pressure and hate focused on those that live in reality.  When liberal policies decimate minorities, it’s “White Privilege!”  When union run regressive  schools systematically undereducate, if educates at all, it’s really  “White Privilege!”  When welfare policies destroy families, leading to increased crime and poverty, it’s “White Privilege!”

And, while we’re at it, why not blame mass murder on “White Privilege?”

Robert Jensen, who is a journalism professor at the University of Texas at Austin, also suggested race-based alienation is a motivating factor behind some parts of the conservative Tea Party movement.

“Why are the men who commit mass murder disproportionately white?” Jensen asked rhetorically. “My guess is that it has something to do with the sense of entitlement that most white people feel.”

“When the world doesn’t deliver what those men feel they deserve, violence is seen as a reasonable response,” continued Jensen.

OK, let’s take this apart.  Frankly, it’s frightfully easy.  First, let’s take a look at one of my favorite terms-“sense of entitlement.”

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

en·ti·tle·ment  [en-tahy-tl-muh?nt]

noun

1.   the act of entitling.

2.  the state of being entitled.

3.  the right to guaranteed benefits under a government program, as Social Security or unemployment compensation.

OK, what do Conservatives and Libertarians want?  Do they claim a right to other people’s labor?  Do they demand ownership of what belongs to others?  OR, do they want to be left alone?  Do they just want to keep what it theirs, and live in peace?  And, is demanding to be left alone exercising a sense of entitlement?  You see, Mr. Jensen is engaging in that great liberal/regressive tradition of projection.  Since liberals do have a well developed and hypersensitive sense of entitlement, they see the world through “entitlement colored glasses.” So, they see their own tendencies in others.  In other words, Jensen is painfully twisting reality in order to accuse Conservatives and Libertarians of having liberal thought processes.

the fact of the matter is that all of the mass killers had significant psychiatric problems, and the laws did not allow anyone to intervene prior to the events.  But, let’s forget that, and blame it all on an fabricated reality used to keep the client classes on the plantation.

Share

Classic Conservative Hideout: Gun Control, the New Anti-psychotic, Re-revisited

Share

Here is a slightly edited version of an old post from the second month of the original Conservative Hideout.  With all the talk of gun control lately, I thought it might be a good idea to repost.  The original post was published on March 15th, 2009. Enjoy!- Matt

For the latest, let’s look at gun control.  Now this, in my opinion, consists of using both hands so you DON’T MISS.  But apparently, the libs have a altogether different idea on this.   After mass shootings in both Alabama and Germany in the recent weeks, the libs are suggesting that gun control might have prevented these unfortunate events.

As usual, I intend to go straight to the source, and get at the truth.  Let’s interview some whackos, shall we?

Out first lucky contestant is from a “cabin deep in the woods.”  His name is Duke VanConspirator.

Me:  Hello Duke.  How are you today?

Whacko# 1:  (Looks around nervously)  Who sent you?  Was it THEM?

Me:  Easy there friend.  I sent myself.  I wanted to know how you felt about guns.

Whacko # 1:  Guns are the instrument of our SALVATION.  The sprirts have told me that there will be a CONFLAGRATION.  I will BE IN CHARGE OF CLEANSING THE WORLD!!!!!!

Me:  Cleansing, how very…nice.  The “spirits” tell you this?

Whacko # 1: Yes, they do.  They speak only to me. (closes eyes and looks upward) I am the one they chose to touch with their messages.

Me:  Touched is about right.  What if there was gun control?

Whacko # 1:  Well… then I guess I’d just have to go back to college. Get a degree.  Get married.  You know, all of that “normal” stuff.

Me:  Thanks, that’s all I wanted to know.  Good luck with the “cleansing” and all.

Whacko 1:  BLOOD…BLOOD…Sacrifice!!!!

Well, that was enlightening. Next up, JoJo the Crackhead. JoJo has done so many substances that his brain is completely fried.  This ought to be entertaining.

Me:  Hey JoJo, what’s new?

Whacko# 2:  (paces and speaks rapidly)  Ya gotta help me out man!  Can you front me…I’ll getcha back man, you know I will.

Me:  No can do JoJo, can’t help you out there.

Whacko # 2:  Well then…(takes pistol out)  we’ll see what that convenience store over there has for me.  Time for JoJo to re-distribute some wealth.

Me: Get back JoJo.  Nice to see that you’re inspired by the President, but wait a sec.  I have a question for you. What if there was gun control?

Whacko # 2:  Damn!  I guess I’d have to stop everything man.  Maybe I’d quit drugs and run for Congress.  They re-distribute wealth down there in DC?

Me:  Yes they do JoJo, oh yes they do.

Well, I must admit.  I’m amazed.  CLEARLY, it is true that gun control can ABSOLUTELY stop crazed killers and strung out addicts right in their tracks.  I would have never thought that mass murderers and criminals would FOLLOW A LAW, when they already routinely BREAK OTHER LAWS.  The question is, how do we advertise this?

After much consideration, I found the  answer.  We need to market gun control like a consumer product, or better yet, as an anti-psychotic.  Who better to be our pitch man than the late…

BILLY MAYS HERE FOR GUN CONTROL©!

Having a problem with mass murderers?  Are drug addicts robbing everyone in sight? Gun Control© is the answer.  With Gun Control©, BAM! Crime disappears in one easy step.

DISCLAIMER: Those taking Gun Control© should be aware that they may suffer from sudden-onset, inter-cranial  lead poisoning.  Those taking Gun Control© should avoid public places, and stay in their kevlar reinforced panic rooms.  Using Gun Control© may require other treatments, such as alarm systems, and barred windows.  When there is a home invasion, you should call 911 and HOPE that the local police arrive in time. Use of Gun Control© does not apply to government officials, celebrities, or others that are more important than you.  Gun Control© assumes no liability for unintended  side effects.

Share

Classic Conservative Hideout: Gun Control, the New Anti-psychotic

Share

Here is a slightly edited version of an old post from the second month of the original Conservative Hideout.  With all the talk of gun control lately, I thought it might be a good idea to repost.  The original post was published on March 15th, 2009. Enjoy!- Matt

For the latest, let’s look at gun control.  Now this, in my opinion, consists of using both hands so you DON’T MISS.  But apparently, the libs have a altogether different idea on this.   After mass shootings in both Alabama and Germany in the recent weeks, the libs are suggesting that gun control might have prevented these unfortunate events.

As usual, I intend to go straight to the source, and get at the truth.  Let’s interview some whackos, shall we?

Out first lucky contestant is from a “cabin deep in the woods.”  His name is Duke VanConspirator.

Me:  Hello Duke.  How are you today?

Whacko# 1:  (Looks around nervously)  Who sent you?  Was it THEM?

Me:  Easy there friend.  I sent myself.  I wanted to know how you felt about guns.

Whacko # 1:  Guns are the instrument of our SALVATION.  The sprirts have told me that there will be a CONFLAGRATION.  I will BE IN CHARGE OF CLEANSING THE WORLD!!!!!!

Me:  Cleansing, how very…nice.  The “spirits” tell you this?

Whacko # 1: Yes, they do.  They speak only to me. (closes eyes and looks upward) I am the one they chose to touch with their messages.

Me:  Touched is about right.  What if there was gun control?

Whacko # 1:  Well… then I guess I’d just have to go back to college. Get a degree.  Get married.  You know, all of that “normal” stuff.

Me:  Thanks, that’s all I wanted to know.  Good luck with the “cleansing” and all.

Whacko # 1:  BLOOD…BLOOD…Sacrifice!!!!

Well, that was enlightening. Next up, JoJo the Crackhead. JoJo has done so many substances that his brain is completely fried.  This ought to be entertaining.

Me:  Hey JoJo, what’s new?

Whacko# 2:  (paces and speaks rapidly)  Ya gotta help me out man!  Can you front me…I’ll getcha back man, you know I will.

Me:  No can do JoJo, can’t help you out there.

Whacko # 2:  Well then…(takes pistol out)  we’ll see what that convenience store over there has for me.  Time for JoJo to re-distribute some wealth.

Me: Get back JoJo.  Nice to see that you’re inspired by the President, but wait a sec.  I have a question for you. What if there was gun control?

Whacko # 2:  Damn!  I guess I’d have to stop everything man.  Maybe I’d quit drugs and run for Congress.  They re-distribute wealth down there in DC?

Me:  Yes they do JoJo, oh yes they do.

Well, I must admit.  I’m amazed.  CLEARLY, it is true that gun control can ABSOLUTELY stop crazed killers and strung out addicts right in their tracks.  I would have never thought that mass murderers and criminals would FOLLOW A LAW, when they already routinely BREAK OTHER LAWS.  The question is, how do we advertise this?

After much consideration, I found the  answer.  We need to market gun control like a consumer product, or better yet, as an anti-psychotic.  Who better to be our pitch man than…

BILLY MAYS HERE FOR GUN CONTROL©!

Having a problem with mass murderers?  Are drug addicts robbing everyone in sight? Gun Control© is the answer.  With Gun Control©, BAM! Crime disappears in one easy step.

DISCLAIMER: Those taking Gun Control© should be aware that they may suffer from sudden-onset, inter-cranial  lead poisoning.  Those taking Gun Control© should avoid public places, and stay in their kevlar reinforced panic rooms.  Using Gun Control© may require other treatments, such as alarm systems, and barred windows.  When there is a home invasion, you should call 911 and HOPE that the local police arrive in time. Use of Gun Control© does not apply to government officials, celebrities, or others that are more important than you.  Gun Control© assumes no liability for unintended  side effects.

Share

Obama Allies: Bill Ayers and the Weather Underground

Share

I think it’s about time we take a look at some of Obama’s friends.

The Weather Underground was  a communist group that engaged in bombings in the early 70’s.  Their goal was to take over the government by force, and install a communist dictatorship.  Among the leadership of that group was Obama associate, William Ayers.  Here is part of a video interview with Larry Grathwohl, who infiltrated the Weather Underground. 


Pajamas Media  interviewed Grathwohl in October of 2008.

Pajamas Media: You stated in your interview in No Place to Hide that you wanted us to “imagine sitting in a room with 25 people, most of which have graduate degrees, from Columbia and other well-known educational centers, and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people.” A lot of people have now had the opportunity to listen to you, and contemplate the horrors these people planned. Can you recall who these people are by name, and who the ringleaders of this plan were?

Larry Grathwohl: Conversations regarding this occurred in Cincinnati, Detroit, Flint, and Buffalo. Participants included Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Mark Rudd, Linda Evans, Jeff Jones, and many others.

Pajamas Media: Was this merely an academic matter to them, or were they serious about killing 25 million Americans that would not bend to their political will?

Larry Grathwohl: I suppose you could consider this a purely academic discussion in that the Weathermen never had the opportunity to implement their political ends. However, I can assure you that this was not the case. There was an absolute belief that they, along with the international revolutionary movement, would cause the collapse of the United States and that they would be in charge. Nixon was of great concern and how his end would be conducted. This may sound absurd in today’s context, but the Weatherman believed they would succeed.

Pajamas Media: Did they ever devise a cover story to explain to the rest of America how roughly one in ten disappeared?

Larry Grathwohl: When I suggested that this might be a difficult proposition they looked at me like I had three heads. They would be in charge! They would be in control! Who would oppose them? Lambs to the slaughter I guess.

Pajamas Media: Were any of those Weathermen involved in concocting this plan particularly excited or enthusiastic about the death camps, or was it merely a means to an end?

Larry Grathwohl: Of course they were enthusiastic as it was representative of the success of “the revolution.”

Pajamas Media: Scattered news accounts on the Internet note that you were instrumental in foiling Weather Underground attacks in February  of 1970, in Detroit. The Weathermen built two bombs targeting the Detroit Police Officers’ Association (DPOA) building and the 13th Precinct. Were the goals of these attacks symbolic property damage as were some other Weathermen attacks, or were these targets selected to kill police officers?

Larry Grathwohl: The instructions I received from Billy Ayers was that the bombs to be used in Detroit must have shrapnel (fence staples, specifically) and fire potential (propane bottles). The intention was to kill police officers.

Pajamas Media: One of the Detroit bombs was to be placed on the side of the DPOA building, and the blast was likely to cause damage to the adjacent Red Barn Restaurant, which had mostly African-American customers. Who ordered the attack, and what did he say when you told him that innocent civilians would be killed?

Larry Grathwohl: When I objected to Billy Ayers that more innocent people would be killed in the restaurant, he replied, “Innocent people have to die in a revolution.” Billy also acknowledged during a criticism session in Buffalo that Bernadine placed the bomb at the Park Police Station which resulted in the death of Police Officer McDonnell.

Pajamas Media: Bill Ayers came out of hiding around 1980, became an college professor, and has served on numerous boards and foundations. Do you think he’s changed in his radicalism?

Larry Grathwohl: Has Billy changed? I hardly think so.

Pajamas Media: If conditions permitted, do you think Ayers would still engage in violence to further a political agenda?

Larry Grathwohl: He has acknowledged his support of anti-American groups and stated he felt that the Weathermen hadn’t done enough.

Pajamas Media: Do you consider Bill Ayers an attempted mass murderer?

Larry Grathwohl: I’m not certain Billy is a mass murder; his ego just wants him to be in charge. Note that Billy never does anything that involves risk. He has no problem allowing his women to do the evil task, Diane Oughton and even Bernardine, but never him. As for what he might do, hasn’t he said he doesn’t rule out the possibility of future bombings? [Ayers said he didn’t “want to discount the possibility” in this New York Times article from  September 11, 2001. — Ed.]

Pajamas Media: Would you let your children attend a college or university class taught by Ayers or his wife, Bernadine Dohrn? What would you tell parents who have had their children exposed to Ayers’ academic programs, like the Small Schools Workshop?

Larry Grathwohl: As for Billy’s ideas on education, isn’t it apparent? Reading, writing, and arithmetic aren’t important! Radicalism is what’s important. Fits right in with the Billy Ayers view of creating mindless soldiers to follow his commands — where best to lay the foundations of a revolution than with the young?

Pajamas Media: Do you think there is there any way that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama could not have known that Bill Ayers was a domestic terrorist? Is there any reason that the American people should accept Barack Obama’s newest excuse about his relationship with Bill Ayers, where Obama claimed that he thought Ayers was “reformed”?

Larry Grathwohl: If we are to believe Mr. Obama, he just didn’t know Billy was as radical as he apparently is. Really? Just like he didn’t know the Rev. Wright was as radical as he is? Obama is a politician and he wants me to believe that he never discussed politics with the Rev Wright or Billy Ayers?

So then, it’s pretty obvious that Ayers was a genocidal maniac.  He was more than willing, enthusiastic, in fact, to go where socialism always arrives-mass murder.   A totalitarian system can not allow dissent.  It cannot allow free speech.  It cannot allow freedom. Instead, the socialist state must silence, and if necessary, kill anyone who gets in the way.   It has happened before, the Soviet Union, China, Vietnam, and Cambodia are all morbid examples of the end result of Socialism/Communism.

Notice that the only violence in our current system comes from the left?  Union thugs try to intimidate or beat down people that oppose them.  Anarchists destroy property and assault police.  ACORN is bused in to occupy banks and businesses.  We’ve covered it extensively.  Just imagine what would happen if people like Ayers got close to achieving their goals.  In a sense, is it safe to assume that we are all ready in a low-intensity communist revolution?

Another interesting aspect of the interviews and articles that I have read is that Ayers was all about the planning and rhetoric, yet he didn’t seem to want to get his own hands dirty.  This supports the theory that many would-be “revolutionaries” are perpetually petulant children that want everything their way, but will cry like babies (or throw a tantrum) if the don’t get what they want.  However, Ayers didn’t seem to have a shortage of useful idiots that would carry out his ideas.  That makes him, and others like him, dangerous.

In the end, we need to watch these individuals and groups, expose them, and prepare to meet them.  If we do not, they will meet us, and the element of surprise will be tragic.

Charming guy, standing on the flag, isn’t he?

Share