So the “moderate” Muslims say they want nothing to do with the radical Islamic Jihadis, huh? Then one would think they would welcome this device.
If patriotic American innovation is a crime, then get the cuffs out for Tampa inventor Franklin R. Lacy, who recently filed patent paperwork for his latest anti-terrorism deterrent.
But the invention, a container device filled with the blood of a pig, meant to be installed at sensitive locations to prevent suicide bombings by radical Muslim terrorists, comes with plenty of criticism from pro-Islamic groupsaround the world.
Why would a container filled with pig’s blood potentially deter a jihad-motivated suicide attack? Because pigs, let alone their blood, are considered “dirty” by Islamic standards and running the risk of having pig’s blood sprayed on one’s body would all but guarantee they don’t get a chance to meet their 72 virgins in Muslim heaven.
The director of Faith Matters, Fiyaz Mughal, said the device has “been created by someone who seeks to humiliate specific faiths.”
Well, yeah, one could draw that conclusion, but it’s more like, “strategic humiliation.”
Your ads will be inserted here by
Easy Plugin for AdSense.
Please go to the plugin admin page to Paste your ad code OR Suppress this ad slot.
Lacy’s other inventions, including a fudge warmer, beverage heater and a special boat windshield are less controversial, but not nearly as innovative.
Mughal also attempted to argue that “the patent is particularly troubling if used against Jews or Muslims, because it would be deeply offensive and insulting to their faith and beliefs.”
But we tend to disagree with that statement since suicide bombings seem to originate from one of those religions, in particular. Can you guess which one? Hint: it’s not Judaism.
One would think that moderate Muslims, who claim they don’t want to be associated with radical elements of their religion, would praise such a clever device, but that doesn’t seem to be the case, which once again proves that a “radical” Muslim may be nothing more than a convenient excuse to hide the atrocious, violent nature of Islam, the so-called “religion of peace.”
The major downfall with Lacy’s anti-suicide bomber device is that even if they were placed at sensitive, suicide-bomber-tempting sites around the world, Islamic religious leaders would simply make an exemption for martyr’s who might potentially be sprayed with the swine blood, allowing them entry to Allah’s house for their actions anyway.
The only reason Muslims should be offended by the possibility of these devices being installed are the radical elements of their religion which caused them to be necessary.
Before there was a Bush “Jr”, there was another famous son in the White House. Our sixth president, John Quincy Adams had a VERY famous father, but don’t underestimate him. For example, he had a perfect grasp of the dangers of Islam.
John Quincy Adams isn’t as famous as his father, although he rightly deserves to be. In addition to serving as our sixth president, he also distinguished himself as an abolitionist congressman and a lawyer for the slaves in the mutiny trial of the Amistad.
He was also a man of strong opinions about the religion of Islam, especially since most of the African slaves that made it to America’s shores were abducted and sold by Muslims.
“The natural hatred of the Mussulmen (Muslims) towards the infidels is in accordance with the precepts of the Koran,” Quincy Adams wrote.
He contrasted this with Christianity.
“The fundamental doctrine of the Christian religion is the extirpation of hatred from the human heart,” Quincy Adams wrote. “It forbids the exercise of it, even towards enemies.”
Contrast this with Islam, which was founded by a warlord.
“In the 7th century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab … spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth,” Quincy Adams said. “He declared undistinguishing and exterminating war as part of his religion.”
“The essence of his doctrine was violence and lust, to exalt the brutal over the spiritual part of human nature,” the sixth president concluded. (H/TWND)
This is instructive in these days when we’re constantly told how our founding fathers loved Islam and how the religion has made great early contributions to American culture.
The “early contributions,” such as they were, involved the selling of slaves and the Barbary Wars, incidents I think they’d rather we not remember them for.
And the sixth president did not believe these to be aberrations. Rather, he found these defects to be part and parcel of the Muslim religion.
These days, with political correctness and the constant appeasement of Islamists, it’s helpful to remember what a real president did in the face of Islamic extremism.
Tammy Bruce notes that the first accredited Muslim college, in the U.S., was founded by three “jihadists,” and she asks if Zaytuna College, in where else–wait for it–Berkley, will offer courses in Advanced Stoning. I’m asking if affirmative action will be required, and adhered to? Well, yes it will according to the guidelines of the National Conference of State Legislatures. Any “minority” wanting to study with Jew-haters, male or female (yes, female) may apply, and within whatever the affirmative action guidelines are for schools receiving taxpayer’s dollars, an applicant should have a reasonable expectation of admission.
The National Conference of State Legislatures states:
Affirmative action policies are those in which an institution or organization actively engages in efforts to improve opportunities for historically excluded groups in American society…In institutions of higher education, affirmative action refers to admission policies that provide equal access to education for those groups that have been historically excluded or underrepresented, such as women and minorities. Source: NCSL
The founders are Imam/Sheikh Hamza Yusuf, Imam Zaid Shakir and Hatem Bazian.
1) Hamza Yusuf – I wrote about him in 2009. He was teaching at the “Zaytuna,” at the time, which apparently has now been deemed a “college.” He was born Mark Hanson in Walla Walla, Washington and converted to Islam at the age of 17.
After the attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, Hamza Yusuf Hanson changed his manner, discarding his Wahhabi-style beard and Arabic dress. But he did not change his essential character–he is still a radical. He also did not abandon his penchant puffery: He was once known as Imam Hamza Yusuf; he now styles himself “Sheikh” Hamza Yusuf. Not long ago, the Saudi daily newspaper Okaz published the claim that Hanson is the “mufti,” or chief Islamic jurist, for California–as if the Golden State was governed by a Muslim regime….
For those keeping score, it was just 10 years ago [as of 2006] that Hamza Yusuf issued a denunciation of democracy and the Bill of Rights as “false gods.”
“[America] a country that has little to be proud of in its past and less to be proud of in the present. I am a citizen of this country not by choice but by birth. I reside in this country not by choice but by conviction in attempting to spread the message of Islam in this country. I became Muslim in part because I did not believe in the false gods of this society whether we call them Jesus or democracy or the Bill of Rights.”
On September 9, 2001, two days before the September 11, 2001 attacks, Hamza Yusuf spoke of the sad fact that the Egyptian Blind Sheikh, Omar Abdel Rahman, mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Tower bombing, was unjustly incarcerated, and was particularly bent out of shape that Rahman did not have the opportunity to carry out the plans to bomb Manhattan bridges and tunnels.
Reports say he stepped away from Wahhabbism after 9-11-01. Is he a changed man?He was in George Bush’s office two days after the towers fell, and he joined the group singing God Bless America. He had the influence to get the name of Operation Infinite Justice changed, because it was blasphemous to Muslims.
The Investigative Project on Terrorism’s paper on Yusuf concedes to his changed outer actions but put in print that he is is still “…sees the United States as an inherently hostile nation, one that ‘relishes war.’” From the same report on Yusuf says that George W. Bush’s Iraq policy was a crime and Bush should be tried for felony murder. On videotape, he has “railed” against Judaism, calling it “racist.”
2) Zaid Shakir (Ricky D. Mitchell) was born in Berkeley, California, raised in Atlanta and New Britain, Connecticut. He joined the U.S. Air Force in 1976, and it was during that time that he converted to Islam. He has a BA in International Relations from American University and a Master’s in Political Science from Rutgers. He has served as the Muslim chaplain at Yale.
Shakir is known for having expressed his desire to see the United States eventually become — “not by violent means, but by persuasion” — a Muslim country ruled by Islamic law. “Every Muslim who is honest would say, I would like to see America become a Muslim country,” he said.
In Shakir’s view, Muslims cannot accept the legitimacy of the existing American order, because it “is against the orders and ordainments of Allah.” “[T]he orientation of the Quran,” he explains, “pushes us in the exact opposite direction.”
At least there’s this:
Shakir has condemned terrorist attacks against civilians. Although he was harshly critical of the December 2008 Israeli offensive into Gaza, he warned Muslims against responding with anti-Semitic attacks on Jews. On January 8, 2009, he wrote, “…the Muslim blogosphere is filling up with angry calls for the indiscriminate murder of Jews … [S]uch calls for indiscriminate killing have nothing to do with our religion.”
But then there’s this:
Shakir’s opposition to attacking Israeli civilians did not, however, deter him from defendingHamas. Although he described Hamas’s rocket attacks on Israeli towns as “ill-conceived,” he said that the organization “was never given a chance to prove its commitment to the peace process.”
Shakir also appears to embrace 9/11 conspiracy theories. In October 2007 he described the September 11th attacks as having “occurred under dubious circumstances that have yet to be thoroughly examined.”
According to Shakir, American foreign policy has been hijacked by the military-industrial complex. In May 2009 he admonished the U.S. for its “pattern of demonization, destabilization, and the invasion of hapless Third World nations,” saying that such aggression is always carried out under the guise of national interests. Among those he listed as victims of American “demonization” were Hugo Chavez, Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden, Manuel Noriega, Muammar Qadhafi, and the Taliban. More.
3) Hatem Bazian is a native of Palestine, and currently a senior lecturer in the Near Eastern and Ethnic Studies Department at UC Berkeley (where protests against Jewish students are appalling, and allowed by the university).
Terrorism expert and author Steven Emerson, in his book American Jihad,quotes Bazian sermonizing at a May 1999 American Muslim Allianceconference where he advocated the creation of an Islamic State of Palestine and the slaughter of Jews. Excerpts from the quote read: “In the Hadith, the Day of Judgment will never happen until you fight the Jews. They are on the west side of the river, which is the Jordan River, and you’re on the east side until the trees and stones will say, ‘oh Muslim, there is a Jew hiding behind me. Come and kill him!’ And that’s in the Hadith about this, this is a future battle before the Day of Judgment.”
In May 2002 Bazian was the sole speaker at a two-day Middle Eastern “cultural assembly” at San Francisco’s George Washington High School—an event whose rhetoric was so inflammatory that it generated formal letters of apology from the school administration to the public. The proceedings featured, for instance, a student singing a rap song that compared Zionists to Nazis while other students paraded with Palestinian flags in the background….
Prior to 2006 Bazian was a fundraising speaker for KindHearts, a Hamasfront group that the U.S. government shut down in February 2006 due to the organization’s ties to Islamic terrorism. More.
Hatem Bazian has been closely involved with the Muslim Students Association (MSA), and received his Ph.D. in Philosophy and Islamic studies from–where else–UC Berkeley.
Back to the question of affirmative action, must all females wear head gear? Are you “affirmed if you refuse head gear? The curriculum includes emphasis on key foundational texts; “an in-depth examination of critical methodological issues; a command of the Arabic language; a familiarity with the most important Islamic sciences; and grounding in law, history, philosophy, science, astronomy, literature, ethics, and politics.” And finally, what better way to recruit than offering a degree path, and changing hearts and minds?
Many times I have read that the Muslim Brotherhood, and then-Egyptian President, Mohamed Morsi (Mursi), were behind the Benghazi attack, and funded the attack though Ansar al-Sharia. A strange confluence of events came together just before the Benghazi attacks (more below). Now there are reports that the Saudis funded the attacks, and both reports point to al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), based in Algeria. Hillary Clinton’s “adviser,” Sidney Blumenthal, reportedly had his email hacked by Romanian hacker “Guccifer,” or Marcel Lazar Lehel, as he is known legally. Blumenthal allegedly corresponded with Hillary:
One purported Blumenthal email from Feb. 16, 2013, addressed to Clinton quoted sources “with direct access to the Libyan National Government, as well as the highest levels of European governments, and Western intelligence and security services.”
The email said the information comes from “extremely sensitive sources and should be handled with care.”
The email quotes an “individual with sensitive access” stating information provided by French security services indicated the funding for both the Benghazi and Algeria attacks “originated with wealthy Sunni Islamists in Saudi Arabia.”
Continued the purported email: “During July and August 2012, these financiers provided funds to AQIM contacts in Southern Europe, who in turn passed the money onto AQIM operatives in Mauritania.”
AQIM refers to Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb.
“These funds were eventually provided to Ansar Al Sharia and its allied militias in the Benghazi region” to support the attack, states the email.
Ansar Al Sharia claimed responsibility for the Benghazi attack.
In March 2013, an adviser to Clinton, Sidney Blumenthal, had his e-mail hacked by “Guccifer” — the Romanian hacker perhaps best known for revealing George W. Bush’s paintings to the world. At the time, Gawker reported that Blumenthal was communicating with an account that appeared to belong to Clinton at the “clintonemail.com” domain. The content of some of those e-mails was published by RT.com.
When the Muslim Brotherhood’s Mohamed Morsi was elected president of Egypt for that very short time (before they unseated him), he promised to get the Blind Sheikh, Omar Abdel-Rahman, released from the U.S. prison where he is incarcerated for masterminding the 1993 World Trade Tower bombing. There have been reports (maybe nothing more than rumors, but how would we know?) that the Muslim Brotherhood had a plan to kidnap U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens in Benghazi, and exchange him for the Blind Sheikh. Other stories made the rounds that the White House was in on the kidnapping–convenient for Obama to get Rahman back to the people he (Obama) reveres. Do you really think we would have let Chris Stevens live out the rest of his life in a jail cell in some Muslim country? But, of course, the kidnapping, if that’s what it started out to be, went wrong. In June 2013, just three months before Ambassador Stevens died, Morsi was giving press conferences about the release of the Blind Sheikh.
As for President Morsi, a video made during the consulate attack records people speaking in the Egyptian dialect: as they approach the beleaguered U.S. compound, one of them yells to the besiegers, “Don’t shoot—Dr. Morsi sent us!”
Former Congresswoman Jane Harman (D-CA) takes a “guess” on Fox News Sunday, that the unreported $500,000.00 Algerian donation to the Clinton Foundation “got lost in the system,” and was never submitted to the State Department for approval. Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State at the time, and the buck would have, or should have, stopped at her desk for final approval, had it been questionable, which it surely was. Political candidates are not allowed to take money from foreign governments. Algeria is “foreign,” is 99 percent Sunni Muslim with 99 percent Berber/Arab ancestry. She was not a political candidate, at the time, you are saying? Hillary Clinton has been a political candidate since she followed Bill into the White House in January 1993. See the transcript and video below.
CHRIS WALLACE: Congresswoman Harman, does that bother you at all. Are you at all troubled by these donations going to the Clinton Foundation?
JANE HARMAN: Uh, yes. Uh, there was a process set up. All other contributions were reviewed, as I understand it–there was transparency. This was an unsolicited contribution of $500,000.00 at a time when the U.S. deluged with help from Haiti. I guess it got lost in the system. I think it needs to be explained. I don’t understand why the money wasn’t returned, or in some way, after-the-fact approval wasn’t sought, but I assume the Foundation will explain it.
About five years have passed. No explanation so far.
With Hillary’s post at the State Department, came the necessity for a new agreement on what countries could contribute to the Clinton Foundation while she sat at the head of the Department. If a country had donated before, and wanted to continue to donate in similar amounts to past donations, they were allowed to do so. Apparently, Algeria did not fall into that parameter. Notice below Hillary’s “formal” involvement with the Foundation. Can you think of any Republican candidate who could get away with distancing herself from her husband?
Rarely, if ever, has a potential commander in chief been so closely associated with an organization that has solicited financial support from foreign governments. Clinton formally joined the foundation in 2013 after leaving the State Department, and the organization was renamed the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation…
The Washington Post reported last week that foreign sources, including governments, made up a third of those who have given the foundation more than $1 million over time. The Post found that the foundation, begun by former president Bill Clinton, has raised nearly $2 billion since its creation in 2001.
Foreign governments and individuals are prohibited from giving money to U.S. political candidates, to prevent outside influence over national leaders. But the foundation has given donors a way to potentially gain favor with the Clintons outside the traditional political limits…
The Wall Street Journal reported last week that the foundation had accepted new foreign-government money now that the 2008 agreement has lapsed.
A review of foundation disclosures shows that at least two foreign governments — Germany and the United Arab Emirates — began giving in 2013 after the funding restrictions lapsed when Clinton left the Obama administration. Some foreign governments that had been supporting the foundation before Clinton was appointed, such as Saudi Arabia, did not give while she was in office and have since resumed donating. Read more at the Washington Post.
There is musing all around about why Hillary may take many more months before she declares herself to be a 2016 presidential candidate. All the more time to take those foreign government donations.
“For the last six years, Obama has acted as if the biggest threat to American security in that part of the world is the Israeli government…” – Charles Krauthammer
“Obama followed up his recent probing and informative interviews with YouTube celebrities by granting an interview to liberal blog Vox, during which he claimed the terror attack on a Paris kosher deli was “random.” It isn’t clear what the president means by calling the attacks “random.” The deli shooter, Amedy Coulibaly, had previously pledged support for ISIS, and his wife even recently filmed a propaganda video for the group calling for more terror attacks on France. Furthermore, the choice of target was far from random. Porte de Vincennes was a kosher deli servicing the local Jewish community. All four of Coulibaly’s murdered hostages were French Jews…“ — Yahoo Finance
“Obama has sparked some widespread fury over his recent comments to Vox about the Jewish individuals who were brutally killed by terrorists in Paris — specifically, he labeled them “a bunch of folks” who were randomly shot … Obama went on, seeming to place the blame for terrorist attacks at the feet of the United States.” —Washington Times
“Amedy Coulibaly said openly and proudly that he was targeting Jews. No one disputes this, except for Barack Obama … And we know he’s perfectly comfortable denouncing crimes committed in “in the name of Christ” no matter how ancient they may be. But crimes in the name of Allah must not be named as such — or at all.” — Jonah Goldberg
Had the Bataan Death March been orchestrated by Muslims instead of the Imperial Japanese Army, Barack Obama would have labeled it a random act of hiking.
Muslims aren’t going to appreciate this video of patriotic marines showing their love for God.
According to Conservative Tribune, the footage shows U.S. marines praising the Lord and singing the song “Days of Elijah.” These brave men and women clearly understand that with God on their side, there’s no battle they can’t win.
On the face of it, this appears to be just a innocuous, bureaucratic change in the way census forms are filled out. But make no mistake, this is just another step in the march to the Islamic Caliphate that Muslims have sought for centuries.
By granting them a separate category when it comes to denoting race, then it also gives them more access to benefits handed out at tax payer expense. When will we ever learn our lesson?
The federal government may allow those of Middle Eastern and North African descent to identify as such on the next 10-year Census, which could give Arab-Americans greater political clout and access to public funding.
The U.S. Census Bureau will test the new Middle East-North Africa classification for possible inclusion on the 2020 Census if it gets enough positive feedback about the proposed change by Sunday, when the public comment period ends.
The Census now allows people to claim Hispanic, Japanese and even Hawaiian ancestry, but there’s no designation for Arab-Americans. So they’re considered as white by the Census, which helps determine congressional district boundaries and how billions of dollars in federal aid are allocated.
The designation has prompted debate for years in Michigan, home to at least 192,000 residents of Arab ancestry, according to the Arab American Institute of Washington, D.C. That’s second to California; Metro Detroit is believed to have the largest metropolitan population of Arab-Americans in the U.S.
However, not all Americans of Arab descent are for this move.
Some Arab-Americans resist the designation because they don’t consider themselves minorities, said Imad Hamad, executive director of the American Human Rights Council of Dearborn.
Hamad said some Arab-Americans are leery of giving information after 9/11 for fear of being singled out. Others argue a change could isolate Arab-Americans.
“I’m not for it. … I feel I’m a Mayflower American,” said Eide Alawan, 74, the son of a Syrian immigrant and interfaith outreach coordinator of the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn.
“We’re broken down into villages and countries (where we come from) — I don’t like that.”
But the real kicker is that this boils down to, as usual, money. And not just money, but taxpayer money.
The change could help Arab-Americans qualify for up to $400 billion in federal programs and give greater protection under civil rights laws, according to an analysis from the Pew Research Center. Any switch would require congressional approval, which Jaber said could be difficult. Some Republican lawmakers are critical of the Census and have sought to eliminate community surveys, which, unlike the main decennial count, aren’t constitutionally mandated.
The movement in Europe against the ‘Islamisation’ of their way of life seems to be growing.
A Dutch right-wing political party has demanded Netherlands be cleared of mosques, amid an ongoing row over the integration of Muslim and Turkish minorities in the country.
Machiel de Graaf, a member of Dutch anti-immigration and anti-Islam Party for Freedom (PVV), asked all mosques in the country to be shut down while speaking during a debate on integration in the House of Representatives.
Emphasizing that a Netherlands without mosques would be better, the parliamentarian said “We want to clean Netherlands of Islam.”
In addition to not being integrated into Dutch society and refuse to be assimilated, Muslims living in the country threaten Dutch identity and culture by giving more birth, according to de Graaf.
De Graaf’s remarks drew harsh criticism from members of social democratic parties attending the debate.
While Labor Party (PvdA) deputy Roos Vermeij urged the right-winger to retract his words, Democrats 66 (D66) deputy Sten van Weijenberg stressed his statements were dangerous.
De Graaf’s party, which is led by right-wing politician Geert Wilders, has been a vocal critic of Muslims and immigrants living in the country, but his words mark the first time that the request for the complete closure of mosques has been expressed.
The principal at Rocky Mountain High School in Fort Collins, Colorado, is facing a hailstorm of criticism from some very angry parents and residents.
The school recites the Pledge of Allegiance weekly, on Mondays. Last Monday, a member of their “Cultural Arms Club” led the student body in an Arabic version of the pledge, replacing the words “under God” with “under Allah.”
But the principal says his school isn’t pushing any agenda, Arabic or otherwise.
Principal Tom Lopez denies any attempt to push an Islamic agenda, saying, “These students love this country. They were not being un-American in trying to do this. They believed they were accentuating the meaning of the words as spoken regularly in English.”
Principal Lopez doesn’t make any sense. Speaking unintelligible words in Arabic in some way accentuates their meaning? That is an extremely weak argument in defense of an ill-advised decision.
He said the cultural clubs seeks to “destroy the barriers, embrace the cultures” that exist within the high school.
That would translate into “destroy the barriers to Islam and embrace it,” correct, Mr. Lopez?
So this school made a mistake, right? I mean everyone is entitled to make a mistake. Well, maybe they’ve been down this road before…
The Poudre School District communications director, Danielle Clark, said they understand why parents are upset. She told Fox News, “We understand not everybody would agree with the students’ choice. We’ve heard there are some who are upset.”
Let’s put his into perspective for the feeble-minded Clark and Lopez. It is not the student’s choice. They do not control the public address system. It was a school choice.
The amount of stupidity that these school administrators can stoop to, is only surpassed by their apparent lack of knowledge of our country’s founding.
Her simplistic defense included a reference to “one” supportive email and a reference to a similar mistake last year which drew controversy when the pledge was recited in Spanish. Somehow not learning from and expanding upon your previous mistakes is perceived as a viable defense for these educators.
“We deferred to the students because it’s their deal,” she said.
As if to reinforce the idiocy of reciting the pledge in another language, Clark said she did not hear the pledge and does not speak Arabic so she could not confirm exactly what words were used.
But one local resident broke it down to a level that, hopefully even the “elite masterminds” in control at Rocky Mountain High School in Fort Collins, Colorado can understand.
One resident, Chris Wells put it in terms even educator Lopez could understand. Writing in The Daily Coloradoan, he said:
“As a veteran and a friend of a man killed defending these children in their little games they like to play with our pledge, I’m offended. There are things that we don’t mess with – among them are the pledge and our anthem.”
Just in case those folks in Colorado are too “fuzzy” from a “contact high”, here is another explanation of our beloved Pledge of Allegiance. Please pay attention Red Skelton’s voice at the end of this video. You can hear the catch in his throat as he gets choked up over expressing his love for his country.
Hollywood, AND Rocky Mountain High School in Colorado, you could do well to learn a thing or two from this Great American.
“I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.” (8:12)
“So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them.” (9:5)
“Those who reject Allah follow vanities, while those who believe follow the truth from their lord. Thus does Allah set forth form men their lessons by similitude. Therefore when you meet in battle those who disbelieve, then smite the necks until when you have overcome them, then make (them) prisoners. But if it had been Allah’s Will, He could certainly have exacted retribution from them (Himself); but (He lets you fight) in order to test you, some with others. But those who are slain in the Way of Allah,- He will never let their deeds be lost.” (47: 3-4)
Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them. (2:191)
Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood. (9:123)
Kill the Jews and the Christians if they do not convert to Islam or refuse to pay Jizya tax. (9:29)
Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable. (3:85)
The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them. (9:30)
Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam. (5:33)
The infidels are unclean; do not let them into a mosque. (9:28)
Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies.(22:19)
The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them. (8:65)
Muslims must not take the infidels as friends. (3:28)
Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels (8:60)
I could go on, but I think you get the picture. So if Islam is the religion of peace, then why are they calling for all Muslims world-wide to murder all the infidels (anyone who isn’t a Muslim)?
The reason the Islamic State is so free to call Muslims to kill is because they have the book, the theological and religious imperative to do so.
They are confident because they conquer in the cause of Allah. And their contempt for our weakness is blatant, they call John Kerry “the old uncircumcised geezer” and Obama “the mule of the Jews” while ridiculing him for his ridiculous platitudes about Islam.
“ISIS audio urges attacks on ‘unbelievers’ in Canada,” CBC, September 22, 2104 (thanks to Sharia Unveiled) Coalition members among those targeted in latest ISIS propaganda speech
In an audio recording distributed widely on social media Sunday, Islamic extremist group ISIS urged attacks on civilians in member countries of the U.S.-led coalition opposed to their violent spread through areas of Syria and Iraq.
In the nearly 42-minute long meandering propaganda speech uploaded to Twitter, ISIS spokesman Abu Muhammad al-Adnani encourages Muslims to kill “disbelievers” in countries, including Canada, currently supporting American and French-backed military action against the group in Iraq “in any manner.”
Abu Mohammad al-Adnani, seen in this image grab taken from a video on July 8, 2012, issued fresh threats against Westerners in a speech released on audio. (CBC)
“If you can kill a disbelieving American or European — especially the spiteful and filthy French — or an Australian, or a Canadian, or any other disbeliever from the disbelievers waging war, including the citizens of the countries that entered into a coalition against the Islamic State … kill him in any manner or way however it may be,” said Adnani.
The Canadian government is undeterred by these threatening ISIS recordings.
In a statement released Sunday evening, Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s spokesman condemned the recording and said Canada will continue to support efforts to defeat ISIS.
“ISIS represents a threat not just to stability in the Middle East, but to global security,” said Jason MacDonald, the prime minister’s director of communications.
“We will continue to work with allies to push back against this threat. Like our allies we will not be cowed by threats while innocent children, women, men and religious minorities live in fear of these terrorists.”
The Canadian government has not said whether it views the recording as authentic, but the French government appeared to be treating it as authentic, as did SITE, a Washington based think tank that analyzes terrorist groups.
The Harper government has taken a hardline against ISIS. Last week Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird compared the fight against ISIS to the struggles against communism and fascism.
ISIS has been setting itself apart from previous terror groups by their social media savvy.
In his statement, Adnani mocked Western leaders over their deepening military engagement in the region and said U.S. President Barack Obama was repeating the mistakes of his predecessor, George W. Bush.
“If you fight it (Islamic State), it becomes stronger and tougher. If you leave it alone, it grows and expands. If Obama has promised you with defeating the Islamic State, then Bush has also lied before him,” Adnani said, according to the transcript.
Obama, who has spent much of his tenure extracting the United States from Iraq after its costly 2003 invasion and occupation, is sensitive to charges that he is being drawn into another long campaign that risks U.S. soldiers’ lives.
While Obama has ruled out a combat mission, military officials say the reality of a protracted campaign in Iraq and possibly Syria may ultimately require greater use of U.S. troops, including tactical air strike spotters or front-line advisers embedded with Iraqi forces.
Adnani also condemned Saudi Arabia, whose senior Muslim clergy have denounced Islamic State and whose ruling royal family has joined other Arab states in a pledge to tackle militant ideology as part of a strategy to counter the group.
Adnani slammed Western inaction over the conflict in Syria, where President Bashar al-Assad’s forces have been embroiled in a three-year-old civil war with mainly Sunni Muslim fighters. He said the West had “looked the other way” when barrel bombs were dropped and chemical weapons were used against Muslim civilians.
“So know that – by Allah – we fear not the swarms of planes, nor ballistic missiles, nor drones, nor satellites, nor battleships, nor weapons of mass destruction,” he said.
His response to the question was a resounding no! He then went on to point that many Muslim organizations and Muslim leaders from the Muslim world are speaking out against ISIS every day; but he admitted that’s not enough. When Kelly point out that the only countries talking about going to Iraq and Syria to fight ISIS are non-Muslims countries, he said it should be the UN peace keeping forces that take on ISIS and the majority of those forces should be from Arab countries.
Yes! This is what Asylum Watch has been saying for a long time. It’s high time the US and others stop being the proxy warrior for the Arab countries. I hope Obama and his NATO counter parts are listening.
It’s a rare day indeed when I find myself agreeing with a Muslim and with the UN.
Well, that’s what I’m thinking. What are your thoughts?
The progressive creed of political correctness (PC) has been foisted on western cultures for decades. I don’t know if the progressives used this weapon with the intention to divide and destroy our cultures or if they really believe in a kumbaya world. This humble observer of the asylum we all have to live in is to point where he no longer cares what their intentions are/were. It’s time _ no, scratch that _ it’s way past time that those who still maintain a modicum of sanity to stand up and be counted and to call this particular tool of the insane for what it is: a tool for achieving social rot and a tool to protect evil. To do otherwise is the most despicable form of cowardness.
The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis.
Political correctness and its partner in crime, diversity, have been used by our political class, to name just a few examples, to protect those who commit most of the acts of terrorism by irradiating the words Islam, Islamists, Muslims or radical Muslims from all anti-terror manuals of government agencies, they have used PC to tie the hands of law enforcement and border control with laws against racial profiling even those the crime statistic indicate good reason to use racial profiling to catch the law breakers, they used PC to attack freedom of religion, and they have used PC to prevent any real discussion of the social decay in our inner-cities.
As bad as the PC carnage is in the US, the PC pushers have had even more success in Jolly Ole England. Surely the worst exmaple of social rot and the protection of evil is on display in the disgusting and outrageous scandal that has been exposed in the city of Rotherham in the Yorkshire region of England where for 16 years more than 1400 children were sexually abused and the authorities were aware of what was happening but did nothing for fear of being branded racist or bigots.
16 YEARS!… 1400 CHILDREN!… THE AUTHORITIES KNEW!
I’ve resisted writing about the Rotherham scandal because the outrage I feel is literally not good for my health. The overwhelming desire to personally inflict great bodily harm on those who committed these heinous crimes and on those who looked the other way for 16 years is not healthy. So, rather than continue to write, I present the recent entry at the Woodpile Report by Ol’ Remus. Ol’ Remus and those he quotes do a pretty good job of capturing my feelings without all of the foul language which is yearning to flow from my keyboard.
Politically correct child rape
The rich tapestry of Diversity
By Ol’ Remus
The sexual abuse of about 1,400 children at the hands of Asian [UK code for Pakistani Moslems]men went unreported for 16 years because staff feared they would be seen as racist. Children as young as 11 were trafficked, beaten, and raped by large numbers of men between 1997 and 2013 in Rotherham, South Yorkshire. More than a third of the cases were already known to agencies. In two cases, fathers had tracked down their daughters and tried to remove them from houses where they were being abused—only to be arrested themselves when police were called to the scene, say De Graaf and Williams in this article at Daily Mail.
Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham (1997–2013), Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council, .pdf download, 2.05 Mb.
Remus says: If the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say, This was their lowest hour. A people who won’t protect their children, but instead knowingly protect their tormentors, doesn’t deserve to survive. The Tommies who fell in Europe would use those Webleys secreted in your garden walls rather than allow this outrage to go unanswered. At this point “appearances” are sufficiently served with mops and pails. Unless the good people of Yorkshire redeem this unconscionable betrayal by bringing vigilante justice—meaning extrajudicial corporeal punishment of the graphic kind—to the Pakistanis, the police, the child welfare authorities and all others involved, by commission or omission; that former sceptered isle is truly lost, by its own hand, and merits no respect from decent men.
Tony Woodlief af Instapundit says: A moral response to this behavior might involve those officials, among others, hanging from lampposts. The legal system is, ultimately, an ancient bargain: Renounce your mob violence and blood feuds and we will provide you with justice. It could be argued that such a default as this calls the whole bargain into question, and justifies self-help along ancient lines.
The best of European manhood almost died to a man on the battlefields of WWI, and that continent has experience a long, down-hill slide ever since with the bare few honorable men fighting a losing battle against the creeping, glacial crush of pathetic, simpering dullards and the culture-smashing pressure of unfettered immigration from the Third World. The thirst to be seen as civilized and un-bigoted is feeding this craven get-along/coexist stupidity. And it’s coming to America. Miller, comment at tonywoodlief.com
I apologize, dear readers. Now that I have the words of Ol’ Remus and others on my screen before me, I find I still need to vent some steam. Next to the title of the Ol’ Remus pice is a small box with an arrow coming out of it. That is a link to a Daily Mail article where they do indeed report the scandal. But, even so, they could bring themselves to identify in words who the child abusers were other than to refer to them as Asians. Too their credit they did publish photos of the men with their names. But, why was it so hard for the reporters to say that they were Pakistani Muslims? THEY WERE PAKASTANI MUSLIMS, DAMN IT! I’m sure they will get a civilized and politically correct trial and the citizens will get to pay for their care for the next fifty years. THEY SHOULD BE SUMMARILY EXECUTED _SLOWLY! The article reports that the Leader of the Rotherham Council stepped down but no council employees will receive disciplinary action. Seriously? TARRING AND FEATHERING WOULD BE TOO GOOD FOR THEM! The article, also, includes a video of the Chief of the South Yorkshire Police apologizing to the child victims. That’s it? You apologize for allowing this to go on for 16 years? YOU SHOULD HAVE HUNG YOURSELF IN YOUR OWN JAIL CELL!
What about all the social workers and school councilors who knew what was going on? What about thousands of parents of these kids? Are we to believe that none of them had a clue of what was happening to their children? What about the millions of progressives who pushed this PC poison for the last several decades? I hope Dante was right!
Well, that’s what I’m thinking. What are your thoughts?
Given that schools are now teaching that the holocaust never happened, and that the regressives are unmasking themselves and increasingly showing their anti-Semitic roots, would it be a big surprise that this crime would be committed by either muslims or liberals? Wouldn’t be a surprise at all, given the fact that muslims are ordered to kill Jews, and most mass shooters have had some connection to liberal causes or ideologies? Also, we must also consider that liberals all over the country have been calling for the extermination of the Jews. Is it a surprise that we will see people eventually act on those calls for genocide?
Time will tell, but something tells me that the media isn’t going to want to cover this.
If Philip Kiko is the “Majority Staff Director” for the House Select Committee on Benghazi, I’m expecting the “Minority Staff Director” to be, maybe, CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad, or Dalia Mogahed. It’s not a stretch. I admit I don’t know much about the way a House Select Committee is formed. I haven’t found anything explaining why an outside “majority staff director” is needed, but assuming one is needed, why has Rep. Trey Gowdy chosen lobbyist, Philip Kiko, who has worked on behalf of the most liberal of all organizations (see that partial list below).
• American-Arab Anti-Discrimination
• American Association for Affirmative Action
• American Federation of Teachers (AFL-CIO)
• Amnesty International
• Equal Justice Society
• Global Rights
• Immigration Equality
• Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund
• Muslim Advocates
• National Black Justice Coalition
• National Center for Lesbian Rights
• National Center for Transgender Equality
• National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty
• National Committee on Pay Equity
• National Council of La Raza
• National Immigration Forum
• National Immigration Law Center
• National Organization for Women
• Open Society Policy Center
• Sierra Club
• Southern Poverty Law
• and most of the member churches of the liberal National Council of Churches
Congressman Gowdy’s statement about Philip Kiko:
He has a proven record of effective leadership and management, and I am pleased to have him on our team as we conduct a serious, fact-driven investigation to ensure our fellow Americans know the full truth about what happened in Benghazi,” Gowdy said in a statement. Source: Politico
Speaker John Boehner, dragged kicking and screaming into this investigation, “praised” Kiko, who has a history of working for Republicans on the Hill. Boehner said Kiko is a “man of unquestioned integrity.” So there’s the story: Boehner picked him (is my guess). There is still reason, in my opinion, to believe that Boehner knew of, and approved Ambassador Chris Stevens’ mission — running weapons from Libya to the Syrian rebels, reason enough that Boehner, and perhaps the entire House leadership, did not want this investigation.
Remember the 2012 presidential elections when Republican presidential candidates Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, Jon Huntsman and Newt Gingrich failed to receive the required 10,000 signatures for a ballot placement in the important state of Virginia? They did not end up on the ballot, but Democrats in Michigan have better fortunes. Congressman John Conyers, running for yet another opportunity to screw the American people through his congressional privilege, allowed non-registered voters to circulate petitionsgathering names for his run,and — the petitions failed to get the required 1,000 VALID signatures. After the INVALID names were removed, Conyers had only about 400 presumed VALID names. The petitions were still circulated by unqualified persons. The Michigan Secretary of State said Conyers’ name would not be on the ballot and cited the state’s “purity of the ballot access process,” but a Detroit federal judge cited Conyers’ “good intentions.” Guess who won.
“The Michigan Election Law is designed to protect the purity of the ballot access process,” the Secretary of State’s review said. “The laws governing this activity place affirmative duties on petition circulators. As evidenced over the past two election cycles, when campaigns fail to comply with the law by executing basic principles of petition circulation, they create their own ‘ballot access crisis’ when their failures are discovered by or brought to the attention of election officials. In this instance, consultant Steve Hood freely admitted that he failed to ensure that the petition circulators he hired to work on Conyers’ campaign were registered to vote.”
Despite the state’s legal findings on the very same day that state election authorities determined that Conyers did not belong on the ballot, the Obama-appointed federal judge reversed that decision and insisted he be placed there anyway.
And Conners’ “good faith intentions:”
There’s evidence that the failure to comply with the law was a “result of good-faith mistakes that (circulators) believed they were in compliance with the statute,” the judge said. Source: Fox News
A little more detail:
After Conyers’s primary opponent, Reverend Horace Sheffield, challenged the congressman’s ballot petition, election officials discovered that a large number of his campaign’s signatures had been collected by volunteers who weren’t registered Michigan voters, as the law required. Source: National Review Online
In 2012, Michigan Republican representative Thad McCotter was kept off of the ballot because of invalid signatures. McCotter initially pursued a write-in campaign, before eventually dropping the effort and resigning from Congress.
Paul Weston, the leader of the Liberty GB party in Great Britain was arrested this past weekend for, of all things publicly quoting one of his country’s greatest statesmen, Sir Winston Churchill.
Yes, you read that right. It would analogous to Sarah Palin being arrested in America for publicly quoting George Washington, or Abraham Lincoln.
But before we get to the “crime” of quoting Churchill, just exactly what is the Liberty GB party? Well, it has been favorably compared to the Tea Party movement here in the United States.
Liberty GB has been compared to the USA’s Tea Party, and in fact has many similarities with it.
Looking at the Tea Party’s “15 Non-negotiable Core Beliefs” reveals that, apart from the belief about Obama’s stimulus which is specifically American, 13 out of the remaining 14 – the exception is about gun ownership, on which our views vary – are very close to our own core beliefs.
The 15 open with: “Illegal immigrants are here illegally.” It may appear a truism, but there’s an important reason why tautologies like this need to be enunciated, namely that the Left nonsensically tries to deny them and their implications, in the UK as in the USA. You couldn’t find a party in Britain which would agree with that sentiment expressed by the Tea Party more than Liberty GB.
Our manifesto contains “Deport all illegal immigrants” and “Establish a National Border Police Force to tackle illegal entry and other cross-border crime.”
Several Tea Party’s core beliefs, like ours, stress the importance of economic issues and of balancing the respective countries’ budgets.
The two entities also share a common belief in lowering taxes and reigning in spending.
Several Tea Party’s core beliefs, like ours, stress the importance of economic issues and of balancing the respective countries’ budgets.
So now we can get back on point, which is the arrest of the Liberty GB Party’s leader, Paul Weston. On Saturday, the 26th, he was standing on a public street, NOT private property when he was using a megaphone to read from a part of Sir Winston Churchill’s literary works.
At around 2pm, Weston was addressing the passers-by on the street from the steps of Winchester Guildhall with a megaphone. He quoted the following passage about Islam from Churchill book, The River War:
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the faith: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith.”
Reportedly a woman, who found the passage “disgusting”, came out of the Guildhall and called the police.
Responding to her call, six or seven police officers arrived and questioned Weston for about 40 minutes.
At about 3pm, they arrested and searched him, and took him away in a police van.