Three Workers at Disney Busted in Child Sex Sting


Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Three workers at Disney apparently thought that the “happiest place on Earth” is somehow equated with having sex with children.  Consequently The Disney Three, as I would coin them, were caught trying to arrange just that.  Dan Riehl has more…

According to the Orlando Sentinel, three of those arrested listed their employer as Walt Disney World: Robert Kingsolver, 49, Patrick Holgerson, 32, and Joel Torres, 32.

All have been charged with a variety of crimes, including traveling to meet a minor. Kingsolver’s LinkedIn page lists him as a Service Manager at the amusement park.

Patrick Holgerson profile picture features a photo of himself with Mickey Mouse.Another of the accused, Alexander Vorobets allegedly brought a Mcdonald’s Happy Meal and a box of condoms to what he thought was going to be a sexual encounter with a small child.

via Be Mine Sex Sting: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | HEAVY.

A Happy Meal and a box of condoms…that is really sick.  But, in the multicultural and “tolerant” now, this is to be expected-even at Disney.

Did I mention that there are a ton of people in Florida that want t0o make this legal? 


Sandy Hook Shooter, Adam Lanza, Had a Movie About ‘Man-Boy’ Love, Documents About ‘The Rights of Pedophiles’


Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook school shooter, had some sickening material on his computer.  Aside from materials on mass murders, there was a disturbing set of materials on “Man-Boy love,” and the “rights of pedophiles.”  The Other McCain has more…

This might give gay pedophiles a bad reputation:

The state’s attorney report on the horrific murders at the Sandy Hook Elementary School by shooter Adam Lanza found no “conclusive motive” for his actions but did document unsettling facts about the 20-year-old killer, including computer files he kept on the rights of pedophiles, a movie about man/boy love, instant messages concerning “homosexual fantasies,” numerous mass murder documents, and a computer game entitled “School Shooting.”

Jammie Wearing Fools: “Well, this will probably be the last you ever hear about Adam Lanza from the mainstream media.” Indeed.

I would have to agree with the assessment.  This seems to identify Adam Lanza as not only gay, but  pedophile, interested in “man-boy love.”

The full report is available via the State of Connecticut.


Why Did Teachers Not Cooperate in Police Investigation of Pedophile Peer?


Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

You would think that protecting children from sexual victimization would be that “no-brainer” kind of situation that would unite everyone.  And, for the most part, that remains true.  But we are seeing more and more disturbing reports indicating that many teachers are all too willing to side with pedophiles rather than the victimized children.  The Other McCain has more on the story of Matthew LoMaglio, a former Gym teacher teacher, who was recently sentenced to four years in prison for victimizing an eight year old.

…but the prosecutor said many of the criminal’s colleagues did not cooperate with the investigation:

Many in the community were also surprised and disappointed that more than 20 educators wrote to the court in the pre-sentencing phase, expressing support for LoMagio but little or no sympathy for the young victim.
“Some of the people (on the school staff) who were cooperative told us there was talk at school, sort of like ‘Are you for the teacher or for the student,’” Kyle Rossi, the assistant district attorney who tried the case against LoMaglio, told EAGnews. “It was very disappointing to make contact with teachers who wouldn’t give us the time of day until they were instructed to.” . . .
But building a case against LoMaglio was not easy, because a significant number of teachers and other school employees who had worked with the gym teacher over the years refused to cooperate with police and prosecutors during the investigation, Rossi said.
“I would say that many teachers and administrators at several schools where this guy had taught wouldn’t talk to us at all,” Rossi said. “We ran into cold shoulders all the way around. They would say things like ‘nothing happened here’ and ‘I don’t know anything, I don’t want to talk about anything.
“One person even told a police investigator ‘don’t call me again.’ Some were even rude.” . . .
“It was problematic for us. No one was volunteering to help. There were people who complied – they were cooperative because it was a police investigation – but nobody was excited to participate. There were teachers who simply refused to speak to us.”
Rossi said he was also troubled by the 22 letters the court received from various teachers, expressing support for LoMaglio. He said he is not authorized to turn over the letters to the public or divulge the names of the teachers who wrote them.
Some of the letters were written on school district letterhead. . . .
“These are people entrusted to work with children and they show no compassion for this kid.”

As Stacy points out, this is reminiscent of the case of another former teacher, Neal Erickson, who was found guilty of molesting a student, and teachers supported him, and even made pleas for leniency.

As this blog, and even more so, The Other McCain has been covering, there are an ever growing number of cases in which a teacher has been caught in a sexual relationships with students.  What makes me shudder though, are two things; the first is how many other teachers are doing this, and are not being caught, and how many other teachers know that children are being violated, yet remain silent.

And, if you have kids in public schools, you should shudder too.


#FreeKate Update: Refuses Plea Deal, Was Kaitlyn Hunt “grooming” her Victim?


There have been developments in the Kaitlyn Hunt story.  For those of you that might have missed it, it’s the story of an 18 year old girl and had a sexual relationship with a 14 year old girl.  In any other context, this is an open and shut case.  The perpetrator had sex with an underage child, and goes to jail, right?  Well, this case is different, and the outcry over it inadvertently exposed one of the stated objectives of the gay rights crowd-to either lower, or outright eliminate age of consent laws.

In other words, they want to make it legal to have sex with children.

So, here are the ongoing developments…

Kaitlyn Hunt refuses plea-bargain.

Kaitlyn Hunt, the Florida 18-year-old who admitted a sexual affair with a 14-year-old girl, has rejected a plea-bargain offer from prosecutors in Indian River County and will face trial June 20 on charges of lewd and lascivious battery.

UPDATE: Hunt’s supporters had mounted an online campaign claiming that she was the victim of homophobic prejudice in an effort to pressure prosecutors to drop the felony charges against her.

While prosecutors had offered a plea bargain that would have kept Hunt out of prison on supervised release, Hunt and her supporters wanted the charges reduced to a misdemeanor. Hunt’s supporters say because her sexual involvement with a 14-year-old freshman girl — which began inside a toilet stall at Sebastian High School — was consensual, she should not be charged with a felony.

So then, any pedophile needs to say that the relationship was “consensual,” and they get off with a slap on the wrist, or scot-free?   There is a reason we have laws against having sex with children, they are too immature to consent!

And now, it seems that even though most of the supporters seem to be sticking with Kaitlyn in spite of the lies of her supporters, In fact, it seems that even the Daily Kos has exhibited some journalistic integrity on this one.

I should have warned you to sit down before I said that.  Lord knows home many people reading this via tablet or phone might have lost equilibrium. 

Joan McCarter of Daily Kos — who had originally posted a petition supporting Kaitlyn Hunt — removed that petition and corrected the story as soon as she learned the truth:

Thu May 23, 2013 at 10:29 AM PT: The public scrutiny of this case has brought to light problems with the initial reporting, and with the original story coming from the Hunt family. Previously, Hunt’s parents said that the younger girl was 15, and Hunt 17 when the relationship began. The release of the arrest warrant made clear, as subsequent news stories report, that the younger girl was 14 and Hunt was indeed 18 when the relationship began.
These corrections, and the initial dishonesty of Hunt’s parents, make this story much more problematic, and our original petition moot.

Wow! If only we could explain to McCarter that Keynesian economics doesn’t work and ObamaCare will bankrupt the county . . .

Now, looking at some other aspects of this case has my mind working OT.  let me unravel it here, and you can be the judge.

Pedophiles have a process for gaining access to, and cooperation from, their victims-it’s called grooming.  It can consist of giving gifts, portraying the relationship between the victim an perpetrator as “special,” or something that other people, particularly the victims parentages, “won’t understand.”  Also involved in an escalating exposure to sexual content.  Sadly, if perpetrator grooms his or her victim successfully, the victim will freely cooperate, or even initiate sexual contact.  In older children or teens, the victim may even think that the sexual contact was their idea, when all along, it was the perpetrator manipulating them.  If it sounds like brainwashing, you’re right-the processes are very similar.

Pedophiles also have the twisted thought process that the entire process is consensual, and that they are doing nothing wrong.  In their truly twisted thought processes, they believe that society, the authorities, religion, their victim’s parents, and who ever else disagrees with them are wrong. After all, they’re in love, and one day, society will come along and accept their deviance.

So, why talk about grooming?  Here is why that term popped into my head. 

UPDATE: Ann Althouse blogged about the story and some of the most interesting bits are her remarks in the comments:

Based on the video [i.e., the WPEC-TV interview with Jim and Laurie Smith, parents of the younger girl], it seems that kids at school are putting a lot of pressure on their daughter to reject her parents.
Now, the parents did report her girlfriend in to the police. They did this, they say, as a last resort after their daughter had already run away (without telling them). That was not a good strategy for getting their daughter back, as it’s alienated her further, so that she may feel that her entire social life depends on rejecting her parents.
So, do you think that was very savvy of the parents?
I don’t think so, but the question is what can they do once the other girl has shifted the rhetoric?
The younger girl’s parents made one drastic decision: to report behavior that is, under the law, a felony.
The accused girl got control of the narrative, with much support, making it about homophobia.
There’s really no way back for the younger girl’s parents. They can present their point of view and make it somewhat better, but they must regret going to the police.

What happened, Professor Althouse, was that Kaitlyn Hunt’s parents lied. And why should lying — “shift[ing] the rhetoric” to gain “control of the narrative,” as you say — be rewarded? It seems important to me that liars should never prevail in a situation like this, or else the rule of law will be subverted by dishonesty.

The following is conjecture on my part-be warned…

Note the similarities to a pedophile “grooming” a victim, and this case.  The victim ran away from home to be with the perpetrator.  That matches a line of thought that there was grooming involved.  There appears to be a process in which the victim was encouraged to break from her parents.  Then, we see something even more disturbing, in that there are people helping the grooming process.  Remember that any type of abuser wants to isolate the victim from any source of help.  In this case, peers and persons unknown are helping Kaityln Hunt by convincing her victim that the people that reported the crime are the problem, and “don’t understand.”

I’d be interested to see what kind of texting went on between Kaitlyn Hunt and her victim.  I would not at all be surprised to see that there was a lot of escalating sexual talk between them, as Kaitlyn tried to break down the already  weak defences of an infatuated 14 year old girl.  Perhaps we will learn more as time wears on, especially if the prosecutors now start unfolding the case against Kaitlyn.

But, no matter what cause, the one thing that we learned in this case-and something that we should never lose sight of, is the following…

Liberals want to make it legal to have sex with children. 


Voice of Elmo, Kevin Clash, Steps Down After Second Underage Sex Accuser Emerges


We recently had covered that Kevin Clash, “the voice of Elmo,” was accused of having a sexual relationship with a teen.  Apparently, that wasn’t enough to prompt a reaction reaction from the makers of Sesame Street.  However, the second accuser seemed to make an impact…

And what’s that? You say Elmo likes boys just a little bit too much?

Kevin Clash — known as the voice of Elmo — is facing NEW allegations that he had a sexual relationship with a SECOND underage boy …
The accuser — who is now in his 30s — has filed a lawsuit against Clash … claiming the two met on a gay phone chat line … when the accuser was 15 years old and Clash was 32. . . .
Among the allegations, [Cecil] Singleton claims, “[Clash] trolled gay telephone chat line rooms to meet and have sex with underage boys.”
In the lawsuit, filed in federal court in NYC, Singleton claims Clash “groomed [the accuser] to gain his trust by, among other things, taking him to nice dinners and giving him money.”
Singleton claims while Clash was featured on “Sesame Street,” he was “preying on teenage boys to satisfy his depraved sexual interests.”

That’s so sad. And now Elmo’s going bye-bye.

Seriously, why isn’t this a major news story.  I mean, Sesame Street is featured on the publicly funded PBS, and the iconic red muppet (now an alleged pedophile) makes enough money in merchandising to fund PBS many times over, it seems to me that there might be some coverage of this sad affair?

I guess it’s that Elmo isn’t a Republican.