Michigan Union Violence Update: Thugs use Racial Slurs While Destroying Local Business

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

When you leave the left to their own devices, they’ll most often show you their true thoughts and intentions.  This could not be more true recently in Michigan, where it was seen that union thugs displayed the violence and intelligence that has given them their “thug” designation   Of course, racism has deep roots in both the Democratic party, as well as unions, so it isn’t a surprise that racial slurs flew when a black businessman dared provide a service to Americans for Prosperity.

Stacey McCain has the background…

Lee Stranahan returned my phone call today. He was in Lansing, Michigan, to cover this week’s union goonfest for Breitbart.com, and he told me the story of what happened to Clint Tarver.

Clint is a beloved local figure, his hot dog stand across from the Michigan state capitol being a sort of institution, a landmark. “This is not a guy who’s about politics,” Lee explained. “He’s about hot dogs.”

Americans for Prosperity hired Clint to serve hot dogs at their tent on the capitol grounds, where AFP officials were presenting the pro-freedom side of the right-to-work argument. And when the union goons decided to assault the AFP tent, Clint became a target.

Union Thugs Shouted Racial
Slurs At Hot Dog Vendor While
Trashing His Business

Good Lord. Of course, they have no sense of shame, but are they also completely lacking a sense of irony? I mean, the Left has spent nearly four years building their “Tea Party is racist” meme, and the AFL-CIO brutes — who were nearly all white, as Stranahan reports and video verifies — decide they’ll just waste all that liberal media propaganda in order to terrorize a guy whose only “crime” is serving hot dogs?

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Legal Insurrection has more…

But unless you read conservative blogs and websites, you have not heard that the union protesters shouted racial slurs at the man, including the N-word.

Lee Stranahan at Breitbart.com has an interview with the man in which he details what happened.  You can jump ahead to the 3:42 mark to hear about the racial slurs.

Then, Clint Tarver gave a press conference.  However, I doubt anyone from the MSM bothered to attend.

So, this isn’t going to get covered, being against the narrative and all.  So, racism and violence can be on public display, but our impartial and balanced media will never cover it.

Remember kids, we live in a post-reality world.

Share

Stacey Dash on Receiving End of Tolerance, Racial Slurs Flung by Tolerant Leftists

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

The most noticeable  thing about liberal “tolerance” is it’s contradictory nature.  As Stacey Dash found yesterday, disagreeing with liberals brought out the typical “tolerant” reaction-racial slurs.  The Lonely Conservative has more…

Actress Stacey Dash endorsed Mitt Romney on Twitter and the oh-so-tolerant left showed their true colors.

Actress Stacey Dash, who has starred in everything from the 90?s hit Clueless to CSI, prompted a firestorm on Twitter after publicly endorsing Republican nominee Mitt Romney, and then standing by her opinion.

“Vote for Romney. The only choice for your future. @mittromney @teamromney #mittromney #VOTE #voteromney,” Dash wrote on her official Twitter page, accompanied by a photo of herself with an American flag.

Not long after, presumed Obama supporters began insulting Dash for her opinion, saying she isn’t “black” enough, severaleven asking if the actress would just “kill herself.”

One man wrote: “This hurts but you a Romney lover and you slutting yourself to the white man only proves why no black man married u @REALStaceyDash.”

As news of Dash’s treatment spread, however, First Amendment-lovers nationwide began voicing their support for the actress using the hashtag#ISupportStaceyDash. (Read More)

Twitchy has some more of the steaming hot tolerance.  

Remember kids, the left is only tolerant of people that agree with them.  If you step of the plantation, so to speak, expect punishment.

Share

Death Threats and Racial Slurs: WingNuts or False Flag?

Share

I was home sick yesterday, so I got to see some of Fox’s daytime coverage. In the past hour Cavuto had some Tea Party folks on who condemned attacks on others, and then played some of the death threats that they have received. This is nothing new; the left has been doing this sort of thing for years. It has NEVER been fully covered by the MSM.

For my next thoughts, let me say that this is 100% conjecture on my part. With disclaimer done, I believe that these attacks on the Democrats could very well have been done by folks on their side. Here’s why I think that this might be a possiblity:

1. Democrats have done this in the past, many times. Many racial incidents have been faked. Rather than belabor the point endlessly, you can see links to several events here, here, here, and here.  Please note that the last item appeared to be staged in order to pass a hate crimes bill.  A simple search will find many more.

2. I’ve been warning of “false flag” operations ever since the Tea Parties started. For the best example of this, I submit this from Obama mentor and Chris Matthews’s favorite community organizer, Saul Alinsky.

“Alinsky himself employed this method, quite deviously. Alinsky biographer, Sanford D. Horwitt provides an anecdote using precisely this same diabolical tactic to deceive the people. From Horwitt’s Let Them Call Me Rebel:

“…in the spring of 1972, at Tulane University…students asked Alinsky to help plan a protest of a scheduled speech by George H. W. Bush, then U.S. representative to the United Nations – a speech likely to include a defense of the Nixon administration’s Vietnam War policies. The students told Alinsky they were thinking about picketing or disrupting Bush’s address. That’s the wrong approach, he rejoined, not very creative – and besides causing a disruption might get them thrown out of school. He told them, instead, to go to hear the speech dressed as members of the Ku Klux Klan, and whenever Bush said something in defense of the Vietnam War, they should cheer and wave placards reading, ‘The KKK supports Bush.’ And that is what they did, with very successful, attention-getting results.”

They’ve been doing it for years, as I said.

3. It goes along with the Democratic/leftist tradition of not debating, and instead, attacking/discrediting the opposition. Remember Alinsky’s Rules:

‘Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it.’

– Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals.

4.  There is a long history of liberals posting inflammatory information on Conservative websites. They even tried it on CSPAN.  Ironically, there always seems to be a liberal website all too ready to “report” this “hateful” activity.  Sounds much like what is happening now, doesn’t it?

5.  Need I mention “Seminar Callers?”

6. The MSM has risen to cover these with great zeal. The coverage has been simultaneous and similar in tone. At the same time, they continue refuse to cover the threats that have been received by Tea Partiers and Republicans.  Historically, they also refused to cover threats made against President Bush, or the signs of him being a nazi, or a chimp, or the joker.  I guess it’s only wrong when it happens to the left.

7. As for publishing addresses, I did a post last year when gay group posted addresses, phone numbers, and employers of people that contributed to prop 8 in California. People were harassed, threatened, their employers or businesses were picketed, and many lost their jobs or lively hoods. MSM coverage of this? Zero.

8.  As I’ve displayed here, the left may be simply following their tradition of accusing their opposition of doing what they themselves do.

So, what does this tell us? For me, it shows that the media double standard and bias is alive and well. Also, it shows that the left isn’t above falsifying an event or two to smear their opponents, or get some legislation passed.

As I said in the beginning of the post, this is conjecture.  However, can we not use a group’s previous behavior to interpret their present behavior?  Can this also not be done to predict their future behavior?  Can we expect a movement that has previously acted deceitfully to suddenly be as innocent as a newborn?

That being said, this all could have been done by some fringe elements.  It’s very possible.  However, there is no evidence of that yet.  Threatening phone calls can be traced.  Fingerprints can be lifted from vandalized properties.  Evidence will show us either way.  As for the racial slurs, there is still only one video of the alleged event.

Share