Anti-Semitism Alert: Vienna Crowd Chants ‘Kill, Kill the Jews’

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

It seems that when you leave regressives alone long enough, the unmask themselves and state their true intentions.  We’ve been saying, for some time, that so much of the current anti-Israel/pro-palestinian is thinly veiled anti-Semitism.  Clearly, the people supported by the regressives have the openly stated purpose of exterminating the Jews.    The unmasking continued in Vienna, when a crowd of tolerance tolerantly called for the tolerant extermination of intolerant Jews.  Legal Insurrection has more…

We saw it throughout Europe in the summer of 2014, as well as in multiple U.S. cities. And we have seen anti-Zionism easily morph into blatant anti-Semitism on many campuses. It’s why in Europe Walking While Jewish is so dangerous.

And it just happened again in Vienna, Austria. The Times of Israel reports:

Bosnian soccer fans joined a pro-Palestinian demonstration in Vienna on Friday and shouted anti-Semitic epithets in one of the city’s central plazas, Austrian newspaper Der Standard reported

A video posted to YouTube shows several dozen pro-Palestinian demonstrators waving Palestinian flags in Stephansplatz and calling “free, free Palestine!”

The Bosnian fans dressed in blue, yellow and white are seen standing among the protesters and joining them in their cries, before setting out on a chant of their own: “Ubij, ubij Židove!” or “Kill, kill the Jews!”

…. A wave of anti-Israeli and often anti-Semitic rallies hit European capitals in the summer of 2014 during the war between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The frequent protests, ostensibly calling for an end to Israel’s actions against Palestinians, often devolved into racist demonstrations in which the mob called out anti-Semitic slogans.

But, of course, there will be no mainstream discussion of this.  It doesn’t match the narrative.

Share

Unaired Gun Commercial Sure to Upset Liberals

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

As we all know, regressives hate gun rights.   It interferes with their ability to dominate the public. So, anything that glorifies, or even affirms gun ownership is evil.  So, fully knowing that the following video will terribly offend gun grabbing regressives, I proudly present the following…

 

Share

Liberals Stating That Dissent it Sedition: Calls For the Arrest of Those That Disagree With Totalitarianism

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Nazi Germany, Soviet Union, ChiComs, Chavez’s Venezuala, Cuba, Vietnam, to name a few, all had something in common; punishing dissent.

History is filled with regimes that made dissent a crime.  Prisons, concentration camps, gulags, and even psychiatric facilities were filled with people that simply disagreed with the ruling regime.  In fact, it still goes on today.  The reasoning is rather simple.  When the regime is based on socialism, it fails-and to cover up that failure, opponents must be blamed, and punished.  Then, when the opponents are jailed (or killed outright), the failure continues, and other people are then blamed for the ongoing failure.  After all, it has to be someone else’s fault! Any effort to point out the failure, let alone do something to change or prevent the failure, is branded as treason, or sedition.  In other words, to a liberal, you telling the truth is a crime.  Doing your job, and trying to fix the problem amounts to sedition.

Doug Ross (no relation) has quotes from liberal sources that indicate that is some had their way, a lot of us would be sent to some “camps.”

If Democrats regain control of the House, rest assured that your Second Amendment rights will be eviscerated as they very nearly did following the mass shooting by the lunatic in Sandy Hook. Dianne Feinstein — the loathsome and brazen crook from California — had her gun ban bill in place, just waiting for a nice, bloody tragedy to exploit.

These are some truly frightening portents.

Democrats are openly calling for the arrest of Sen. Ted Cruz “for sedition”. Never mind the Constitution explicitly grants the power of the purse to Congress, not the President. Never mind that James Madison himself described that the House could, in fact, shut down any program it wanted to. Never mind all that: the Constitution doesn’t matter to these hard left sixties retreads. They don’t want any political opposition. They want you gone. They want you silent, or in prison, or dead (what do you think Obamacare is really about?).

MSNBC plainly calls lawful dissent “sedition”, presumably punishable by death.

Democrat Congressman Steve Cohen (TN) labels conservatives “domestic enemies”, alluding to presidential actions to secure the country from the Tea Party, veterans, and Constitutional conservatives.

A public MoveOn.org petition calls for the arrests of Republicans in Congress by the Holder DOJ.

These are some dangerous times, my friends.

Larry Jackson, from Political Realities, has some rather insightful commentary…

The first thing that comes to mind is Hillary Clinton and her famous diatribe against George W. Bush.

I’m sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and disagree with this administration, somehow you’re not patriotic. We need to stand up and say we’re Americans, and we have the right to debate and disagree with any administration.

Funny thing, this debate and disagreement stuff. It applies to every administration, no matter if the man in the White House is Democrat or Republican. That right is guaranteed us by the United States Constitution, but you can’t tell it by listening to the liberals. The rhetoric and tactics in which they engage should serve as a warning to the rest of us. They have no qualms about attacking someone who disagrees with them, aka Brett Kimberlin. If it doesn’t make you wonder exactly what they are capable of, ie. what they are willing to do to further their agenda, then you might as well stop reading now.

Larry hits it right on the nose.  We have to wonder how far they are will to go, and what measures they are will to tale to reach their goals.  History is a very uncompromising teacher, and it shows, very clearly, that when people or groups state vile intentions, they most often try to follow through on them.  It is up to us, as students of history, to point out these intention, lest people be surprised when they come to fruition.

Make no mistake.  The only thing that separates our regressives from the Nazis and Bolsheviks is the speed at which they operate.  Our regressives have worked for decades at ruining our moral and economic systems.  Rather than a bloody coup de main, they have resorted to a slow process of subversion.  They have met success.  But even though they have operated for decades, violence will still have to be part of their final seizure of power.  then, once their seizure of power  is complete, and their system fails, more violence will be necessary to maintain it.  Any totalitarian system must suppress it’s population.  The regressives will. therefore. follow their fellow travelers.

I know, I don’t pain a pretty picture, but if we shy away, stay silent, and disengage, the bad guys will win, and we will be the first to the wall.


Share

Racist Liberals: Sean Penn’s Son Uses Racial Slur

Share

We’ve spend a great deal of time and effort here at the CH 2.0 pointing out the racism of the left.  Call them progressives, regressive, liberals, Democrats, or socialists, makes no difference.  They have been caught red-handed countless times…

1.  Creating Planned Parenthood for the stated purpose of exterminating the black race.  To this day, most of their offices are located in minority neighborhoods.

2.  Ruined education, especially for minority children, and near violently resist any efforts to change it.

3.  Think Detroit.

4.  And who can forget this quote from LBJ…

“These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days and that’s a problem for us since they’ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we’ve got to do something about this, we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference. For if we don’t move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there’ll be no way of stopping them, we’ll lose the filibuster and there’ll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of wild legislation. It’ll be Reconstruction all over again.”

5.  And remember then an  abortionist let loose what what he really thought? 

6.  And that regressive icon, Che Guevara?  Massive racist!

“The blacks, those magnificent examples of the African race who have maintained their racial purity thanks to their lack of an affinity with bathing, have seen their territory invaded by a new kind of slave: the Portuguese.”

“The black is indolent and a dreamer; spending his meager wage on frivolity or drink; the European has a tradition of work and saving, which has pursued him as far as this corner of America and drives him to advance himself, even independently of his own individual aspirations.”

Just think about it.  The regressives have made things terribly worse for many in this country, and all the while pretending to  be the best friends of the people that they are repressing.  So why is it all surprising when the son of Sean Penn, that great apologist for communist dictators, drops an n-bomb on a paparazzi?  I’m 41 has the video…

If you folks are starting to see a pattern here, it’s because there IS one!

Share

When Moonbats Attack: Cultural Marxists Argue to Assert Who is the Greatest Victim

Share

zombiesdemocrats

Take a look at the following video, as the moonbats argue to vie over the greater slice of the victim pie.  Apparently, their victim-hood is just like their economic model, and it’s a zero sum game.  There is only so much victimization to go around, so they have to fight and struggle their greater slice of the victim-hood pie.  Think uber victim.  Try to watch a few minutes…

Ok, there is a lot of screaming and talking in circles, but you get the gist of it.  There was much offense taken, butthurt inflicted, and drama generated.  I particularly enjoyed the part in which they complained that they were being talked over.  As leftists, they ought to know that they is one of their chief tool.  You see, in the world of tolerance and diversity, any opinion other than those held by regressives must be silenced.  Reality cannot intrude on the regressive bubble, so it must be extinguished whenever it occurs.  However, silencing others in the name of tolerance so ingrained in the liberal mind, that it is eventually used against other regressives that are either not tolerant enough, or accidentally spout reality.

Yeah, that’s over nine minutes of your life that you’ll never get back, but it does show you the post-reality world in which we live.

H/T: Breitbart

Share

Man Shoots and Kills Two Home Invaders: National Media Silent

Share

In yet another example of self defence using a firearm, a man used a gun to defend himself, and his toddler son from home invaders.  Yet, the national media chose to take a pass on covering it.

My last post about guns and self defence caused a big stink on some sites, where people took issue with the comment that the liberals would prefer people to be dead, as it is better for the narrative. Allow me to expand a bit: Democrats, liberals, regressives (whatever you want to call them) will not stop at taking ugly guns-they want them all.  So, at some point, their desire is to have a 100% disarmed populace.  When considering that, any example of the lawful use of firearms is detrimental to the confiscation narrative.  However, dead civilians, and especially dead children, are easily exploitable-they are convenient emotional justifications to ban guns.  However, if they ever did get all the guns, and only criminals had them, there would be even more dead children.  But, I would wager that those dead children would no longer be worth covering.  Dead children only have propaganda value in certain contexts.

Linked by:

NRA News

I Own the World

Doug Ross

Thanks to all!

Share

Bill Clinton Claims That Americans are Impatient?

Share

According to former POTUS Bill Clinton, we are inpatient.  Because, apparently, enduring four years of failure, and insisting that a POTUS make things better, and not worse, is a bad thing?  ABC NEWS has more…

Former President Bill Clinton said Friday that President Barack Obama is facing a tough re-election race because “impatient” Americans haven’t fully recognized an economy on the mend.

Campaigning for Obama in Green Bay, Wis., Clinton urged voters to stay the course as more signs of a recovery sink in. Clinton said voters should judge Obama on the past three years, in which private sector job growth has made up for lost ground.

“This shouldn’t be a race,” Clinton said. “The only reason it is, is because Americans are impatient on things not made before yesterday and they don’t understand why the economy is not totally hunky-dory again.”

Well, considering that Obama promised to “fix” all of that by the end of his first term, might we expect people to have some “buyers remorse?”  Also when Obama’s policies seem to have made it worse, and not better, are we inpatient for demanding actual results?

Here’s a more interesting comment…

“Gov. Romney acts like from the minute the president took his hand off the Bible he was responsible for every lost job,” Clinton said.

Now, remember the original Recovery website?  Remember when they were listing “jobs saved or created” that exceeded the number of employees of the organizations reporting them?  Remember the jobs that were created in zip codes and Congressional districts that don’t exist?  It seems to me that the Obama camp was taking credit for several million jobs “created” by the porkulus.  But now, all of a sudden, Obama isn’t responsible for jobs?

Folks, this is just another example of the blame game that the Democrats always play.  However, they have dialed it up to unprecedented levels. And now, it seems that they are saying that it’s OUR fault-apparently for not being smart enough to recognize Obama’s awesomeness.  But them again, that is the left.  We sheeple are way too dumb to recognize how how truly brilliant our regressive masters are.  So, men like Bill Clinton need to remind us of our lowly status, and how he and his regressives friends will fix things eventually.  Our only obligation is obedience.

Share

Are you a Racist? This Video Will Educate you

Share

As you are already probably aware, anyone who disagrees with the regressive line is automatically a racist.  Does it really matter if you don’t actually harbor any racist thoughts?  Of course not! You are so racist, that you don’t even know that you’re a racist.  To further educate the CH 2.0 readers, here is an education video discovered by our good friend, King Shamus…

Never let it be said that we don’t educate our audience!

Share

Gridlock: It's not a Flaw, It's a Feature

Share

The pundits often complain of gridlock, and how government cannot get anything “done” for the people.  While we would certainly argue that what is often done does little more than make matters worse, but that isn’t exactly today’s topic matter.  What we are really talking about is the fact that our Founders planned for, and sought to prevent rapid, sweeping changes to government and society.  The American Prospect, a regressive publication, t has a rather interesting article on the subject, and unintentionally makes many points for us…

Washington has ground to a halt, paralyzed by a political division deeper than any we have seen since the days when Abraham Lincoln warned that a house divided against itself cannot stand. “Nothing” also isn’t doing much to commend the American way to other countries. Much of the developing world now sees China and its model of capitalist authoritarianism as more efficient than the creaky workings of democracy. Nations still marvel at the United States, but today, it’s our gridlock that draws the world’s wonder.

It shouldn’t. The current impasse between the Republican House and the Democratic president and Senate has only highlighted what is a chronic—indeed, constitutional—condition: Just as the American people have a bias for action, the American government has a bias for stasis. Governmental gridlock is as American as apple pie.

The root cause of all this inactivity is our peculiar form of democracy. While most democracies are governed by parliamentary systems, our Founders opted for a presidential system, which they consciously booby-trapped with multiple veto points to impede decisive legislative action and sweeping social change.

In America, for instance, presidents take office, but they don’t form a government, as prime ministers do in virtually every other democracy. Presidents can form no more than an executive branch. They appoint cabinet members, sub-cabinet officials, military commanders, ambassadors, and the heads of regulatory agencies. They don’t appoint congressional leaders; often as not, their party may not control either or both houses of Congress. Indeed, the White House, the Senate, and the House have been controlled by the same party during just 8 of the past 30 years. Even when the same party holds Congress and the presidency, the system still fragments power.

That’s the point, dear reader.  Our Founders may have predated Cloward-Piven by almost 200 years by creating a system that is resistant to tyranny.  It has strained attempts to destroy it until the attackers have been broken.  Multiple checks on power prevent rapid or radical changes, in spite of the regressive’s efforts to undo them.  The results, even though we have been badly weakened, are clear.  We have remained strong and prosperous while Europe spent decades burying themselves in socialism, and the Russian, Chinese, and others spent decades slaughtering their own people by the tens of millions.  Those systems allowed for quick and more radical changes, and their populations have suffered accordingly.   It is through the wisdom of the Founders that we have survives as long as we have, especially considering that freedom have been under regressive onslaught for a century or more.   Sadly, the Founders were not able to create a system that is completely immune to tyranny-that’s where we come in.  It is up to us to elect the people needed to restore the Republic.  While the task seems insurmountable, we still must try.  The fate of human freedom, just not in the US, but planet wide, is at state.

I would encourage you to read the entire linked article.  It is long, but you will come away knowing another viewpoint.  It’s not something I would agree with, but a look at the Constitution from another perspective makes one think, and thinking is no vice.

Share