#FreeKate Update: “Jailbait Manifesto” Appears on Twitter: UPDATED

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

I’m not certain who wrote it, but it was posted by “Rachael.”  I’m calling it, the “Jailbait Manifesto.” Rachael (MRC_43) on Twitter_20130908-142114

Now, this is both interesting, as well as disturbing.   However, since it was publicly posted, it’s grist for the mill, so to speak.  It was posted in segments, as you will see, and  I think I have the order correct.

 

 

Here, the author misses some rather important details…

They overlook that the relationship between the victim and her abuser began when the victim was 14.

She overlooks that from the texts revealed by the prosecution, there was a great deal of manipulation going on.

The Jailbait Manifesto’s author forgets these texts from the alleged sexual offender, Kaitlyn Hunt…

“Keep the f*ck quiet.”

“if my mom finds out we’re talking, I’m blaming it on you.”

“F*ck you…You’re stupid…you want me to go to jail…you’re such a messed up person…you snitched on me.”

And, who can remember this, from Kelley Hunt Smith, the alleged sexual offender’s mother?

“DELETE EVERYTHING..My Number is (redacted) my email is (redacted) PLEASE delete everything and make sure that NO ONE finds out you’ve spoken to Kate at all!”

As well all know, threats and manipulation are at the core of every “loving” relationship, right?

SJ Reidhead, a blogger who is also an abuse survivor, shared her insights in a very powerful post…

This is what Kate Hunt’s victim is looking forward to, for the next 30 or 40 years of her life.  She’s been separated from her parents, now probably doesn’t even trust them.  She won’t trust her old friends.  Friends at church will not be part of her life.

I know someone who dated a guy who was abusive.  His family thought they were above the law, so to speak.  His mother did everything she could to separate this person from her mother.  The damage has taken over thirty years to be repaired.  Their relationship has never been the same.  This is what the victim’s mother has to look forward to, if she is lucky.

Kate Hunt’s victim is at an extremely vulnerable age.  Being 14 and 15 is traumatizing enough, without being a young lesbian, and without being the victim of a psychopathic, narcissistic predator and her extremely vicious parents.  Dealing with life at her age is not easy.  You either hate or love yourself, both at the same time, almost bi-polar as normal.  You are up and you are down, all in the same minute.  When you sit, you hold a pillow in front of your body.  That’s normal.

The victim has been manipulated into thinking that Kate is probably the love of her life.  Her morals have been destroyed.  Her innocence is shattered.  Unless her parents take her far away from Florida, she’s never going to get a break.  The Hunts of this world are far too nasty and far too invasive.  If you  what Steve Hunt is doing to those who are writing about the story is bad, just wait until they continue to harass an innocent life and her family.

As you can see, the victim has been manipulated into thinking that she wants to be with Kate, even though alleged sexual offender,Kaitlyn Hunt, was reportedly in a relationship with another woman!

In this part of the manifesto, the author goes to great lengths to deceive the reader into thinking that this was a consensual relationship, when all along, it is well known that 14 year-olds cannot consent, and the fact that she was so completely manipulated is proof of why.

Here is the second post…

 

Here is the second post, from Rachael Carson Zerbe, of the “Jailbait Manifesto”

RCZ right to jailbait 2

Both girls were humiliated? How might that have happened?

Was it that the Hunts repeatedly named the victim and her family?

Was it the Hunts that went on the Today Show, MSNBC, CNN, and a host of others?

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Was it the Hunts the created petitions?

Did the Hunts use Facebook pages in an effort, among others, to discredit/embarrass/extort(?) the victim’s mother and the Detective (and, ironically Rachael published the said “information” about that detective openly on Twitter!)?

Did the prosecutors have to release the Arrest Affidavit and the Notice of Violation to counter the extensive and persistent lies told by the family on social media, as well as the national media?

So then, who did the embarrassing?

I really loved the part about “Christian Conservative Bloggers,” that “spew the most vile hate filled vitriolic bullsh*t.” Ofcourse, I’m one of those, and you know what?  The author is right.  We have published “vile, hate filled, vitriolic bullsh*t.”  Here are some examples of  vile, hate filled, vitrtiolic, bullsh*t…

James and Laurie Smith wouldn’t give up. They were out to destroy my daughter, they feel like my daughter “made” their daughter gay. They are bigoted, religious [zealots] that see being gay as a sin and wrong, and they blame my daughter. Of course I see it 100% different. I don’t see or label these girls as gay. They are teenagers in high school experimenting with their sexuality, all teens do it in one form or another. They are teens, its healthy and normal. And even if their daughter is gay, who cares, she is still their daughter.

Unfortunately by the letter of the law, this girl has NO voice. Her parents can play the “victims” and ruin my daughters life. We have written letters through our attorneys trying to appeal to these people as parents, talk through it and come to some agreement or understanding but James and Laurie Smith refuse. These people’s delusional stand, their hate and bigotry is tearing our daughter apart.

See, See
See Rachael, what you posted is correct.  We have posted all the vile, hate filled, vitriolic BS posted by the Hunts and their supporters. We have pointed out that they have been lying since day one. And, as we know from the liberals, truth=hate!

And, as we all know, trying to keep an adult from molesting your minor child is the epitome of  a “witchhunt.”

After all, Kate had the legal right, as a lesbian, to sample that jailbait, didn’t she Rachael?  Forget that PFLAG wouldn’t support Kate, because even they said that simple research showed that heterosexuals are prosecuted for the same thing on a regular basis.

The Other McCain has the details…

The local chapter of Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG) refuses to support accused sex offender Kaitlyn Ashley Hunt:

PFLAG of Vero Beach has received questions and comments regarding the controvery involving the two young ladies in Sebastian.
We have been watching the developments in this case since it was brought to our attention. PFLAG of Vero Beach cannot enter into the controversy for the following reason. We have not been able to find where the charges brought against this unfortunate young lady are inspired by homophobia, or are in any way anti-LGBTQ. . . .
The cry of discrimination, unless more facts come out, does not seem to apply here. Some very simple research yields cases where heterosexual kids have been arrested and prosecuted under the same law.

Moving right along…

 

Update:  Rachael Carson Zerbe was suspended from Twitter, but I had screencapped the “Jailbait Manifesto.”RCZ right to jailbait 3

Wow, this is just total nonsense. “Entrapment?” Didn’t Kaitlyn entrap herself by molesting the younger girl in a school restroom? Or, is the author just lamenting the fact that the victim didn’t lie for her abuser?  Then again, the victim didn’t lie for her abuser the second time, even after being instructed to lie, as well as destroy evidence.

Let’s tale a look at the final piece of text…

 

Update:  Rachael Carson Zerbe was suspended from Twitter, but I had screencapped the “Jailbait Manifesto.”RCZ right to jailbiat end

Wow, there is a Constitutional right for adults to have sex with minors? I’m not sure that I’ve ever read that in the Constitution before.

If this were an equal protection case, it would already be over, because, as PFLAG points out, heterosexual cases like this are prosecuted on a regular basis. Is the author suggesting that there is some “special right” for lesbians to molest minors?  The lesbians aren’t asking for it, so I wonder where this is coming from?

Heroines?  I can see it now.  Kaitlyn Hunt can be the “Harriet Tubman” of the jailbait.  Portraits will be painted of her, leading minors out of the dark, cold, night, and into her bed?

There is nothing heroic about molesting minors.  There is nothing virtuous about violating court orders, threatening a victim, or instructing the victim of a crime to destroy evidence.  There is nothing heroic or good about “digging up dirt” on a sexual abuse victim’s family, or a detective.  There is nothing praiseworthy about naming the family of the victim of a sex crime, and causing them to receive threats.  There is nothing noble about lying about a crime so much, that the prosecution has to release true information to correct the public record.  In fact, it is the opposite; it is cruel, manipulative, and completely evil.  A child was victimized, and the Hunts, along with their #FreeKate supporters keep lying and manipulating in order to make it all legal.

I have to admit that reading this “Jailbait Manifesto” was pretty disturbing.  My sarcasm was a reaction to the discomfort.  You see, I’d like to think of myself as a decent man, so seeing this blatant effort to legalize sex with minors is deeply disturbing.  I also know that leftists will work incrementally, so this is really the first slide on the slippery slope towards making sex with younger and younger children legal.  I know about Cultural Marxism.  I knew that this was coming.  It’s just the next step in the process.  It has been an openly stated objective for over 40 years.  But still, I get frankly upset when I see something so totally evil being promoted.  And, as long I have breath, and a keyboard, I’ll continue to point out the the pure evil, the hate, and the lies.

For now, I’m going to hit the “publish button,” and take a shower.

Linked at The Other McCain.  Thanks!

Linked by Regular Right Guy, Thanks!

Linked by Neosexist.  Thanks!

Share

Cultural Marxism Revisited: How Does #FreeKate fit in the Larger Scheme of Things?

Share

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

I’ve been pointing out that the #FreeKate effort is yet another in a long line of leftist causes.  The Hunts, and their #FreeKate minions are attempting to attack family structure, parental authority, and the rule of law-all in the name of making it legal for adults to have sexual relationships with minors.  As well all know, that has been a long term goal for several decades.  And, like other leftist entities, they use Alinsky styled tactics to achieve their ends.  For example, they have attempted smear and intimidate the actual victim, as well as the victim’s parents.  They have attacked and threatened people that have published facts about their case.   They have engaged in a steady stream of lies and falsehoods, all in order to cover for their own wrongdoing, as well as to achieve the goal of legalizing adult-minor sex.

But, why is this happening?  Why have we sunk so far that we are even having a debate as to whether or not it should be legal for adults to have sex with minors?  Shouldn’t it just make sense that we should protect kids from exploitation?  Apparently not.   There is, however, an explanation to all of this.

Take a look at the following, and you’ll have a better idea of why we even have a large number of people that think it’s OK for adults to have sex with children.  This is from a post that I originally published back in 2009.

First, we have to look at the term “Cultural Marxism.”

 

Before World War I, Marxist theory said that if Europe ever erupted in war, the working classes in every European country would rise in revolt, overthrow their governments and create a new Communist Europe. But when war broke out in the summer of 1914, that didn’t happen. Instead, the workers in every European country lined up by the millions to fight their country’s enemies. Finally, in 1917, a Communist revolution did occur, in Russia. But attempts to spread that revolution to other countries failed because the workers did not support it.

After World War I ended in 1918, Marxist theorists had to ask themselves the question: What went wrong? As good Marxists, they could not admit Marxist theory had been incorrect. Instead, two leading Marxist intellectuals, Antonio Gramsci in Italy and Georg Lukacs in Hungary (Lukacs was considered the most brilliant Marxist thinker since Marx himself) independently came up with the same answer. They said that Western culture and the Christian religion had so blinded the working class to its true, Marxist class interests, that a Communist revolution was impossible in the West, until both could be destroyed. That objective, established as cultural Marxism’s goal right at the beginning, has never changed.

 

Now, the meaning of the term “Western Culture” is not made explicit here.  To elaborate, here is a definition:

 

Western culture is a body of knowledge derived from reason.

This foundation of reason has made possible a vast accumulation of understanding related to reality or nature, including human nature.

This understanding is represented in several core ideals and values, which include individualism, happiness, rights, capitalism, science and technology.

Western culture can also be referred to as advanced culture; this is because its ideas and values promote the development and sustainment of advanced civilization.

 

So, when offered Communism, the workers rejected it.  Western Culture interfered.  The ideas of individuality, self reliance, success, work, owning property, the ability to rise above one’s origins, all give hope to the people, especially when the people can act upon and achieve these hopes.   The ability to earn, and keep what you earn; all lead to resistance to Communism.  After all, why would you give up the ability to earn and be successful to join a de-humanizing collective?

 

Christianity has another powerful role on resistance to Marxism.  Marxism is “Godless,” by it’s own description, however, I have often postulated that this is an incorrect.  I believe that in a Marxist state, God is replaced by the state as the giver of life and all things material.  Religion, and its reliance on a higher power creates a situation in which loyalty to the state is secondary to the loyalty to God.  This is intolerable to the Marxist.  The ‘god” of Marxism, the state, is a jealous one, and cannot stand competition.

 

Gramsci famously laid out a strategy for destroying Christianity and Western culture, one that has proven all too successful. Instead of calling for a Communist revolution up front, as in Russia, he said Marxists in the West should take political power last, after a “long march through the institutions” – the schools, the media, even the churches, every institution that could influence the culture. That “long march through the institutions” is what America has experienced, especially since the 1960s. Fortunately, Mussolini recognized the danger Gramsci posed and jailed him. His influence remained small until the 1960s, when his works, especially the “Prison Notebooks,” were rediscovered.

Please realize that Mussolini was not a good guy.  The fascists, particularly Hitler, viewed Marxism as a related, but inferior system to fascism.  Facsims was simply described by Mussolini, as “socialism for one state,” as opposed to the “global” Communism envisioned by Marx and Lenin.  Mussolini was simply imprisoning another political opponent, one from a related, but competing ideology.

Georg Lukacs proved more influential. In 1918, he became deputy commissar for culture in the short-lived Bela Kun Bolshevik regime in Hungary. There, asking, “Who will save us from Western civilization?” he instituted what he called “cultural terrorism.” One of its main components was introducing sex education into Hungarian schools. Lukacs realized that if he could destroy the country’s traditional sexual morals, he would have taken a giant step toward destroying its traditional culture and Christian faith.

 

 

I think it’s easy to see that the long march through the institutions has been largely completed, and the steps to taking political power are well underway.  They have education, law, media, and many other related fields.  Considering that they want to do away with alternative media, ban home schooling, and use law to accomplish both, the intent becomes clear.

 

Also, what conclusions can we make regarding the sexual revolution?  Is it about “liberating people,” or was it just about getting people away from religion?  After all, most religions teach sexual restraint.  This is taught in the home and at church.  However, if the media, and later the schools, teach the opposite, and literally encourage sexual experimentation, a disconnect with the religious instruction and belief is created.  This worked incredibly well in Communist states. And it’s worked equally well here.

 

Here’s another quote that shows that perhaps I’m on the right track…

 

P. Blanchard, in ‘The Humanist” 1983, continues: “I think that the most important factor moving us toward a secular society has been the educational factor. Our schools may not teach Johnny how to read properly, but the fact that Johnny is in school until he is 16 tends toward the elimination of religious superstition. The average American child now acquires a high school education, and this militates against Adam and Eve and all other myths of alleged history.”

 

As time wore on, these Marxists formed what was to be called the Institute for Marxism.  Realizing that people would be alarmed by that name, they instead called it the “Institute for Social Research.”  Colloquially, it was referred to as the “Frankfort School.”  It was meant to deceive, and it worked.

 

With the help of this new blood, Horkheimer made three major advances in the development of cultural Marxism. First, he broke with Marx’s view that culture was merely part of society’s “superstructure,” which was determined by economic factors. He said that on the contrary, culture was an independent and very important factor in shaping a society.

Second, again contrary to Marx, he announced that in the future, the working class would not be the agent of revolution. He left open the question of who would play that role – a question Marcuse answered in the 1950s.

Today, when Hollywood’s cultural Marxists want to “normalize” something like homosexuality (thus “liberating” us from “repression”), they put on television show after television show where the only normal-seeming white male is a homosexual. That is how psychological conditioning works; people absorb the lessons the cultural Marxists want them to learn without even knowing they are being taught.

 

Brainwashing, pure and simple.  Denigrate the culture, and make this denigration appear everywhere.  Schools, media, even some churches, all promote Cultural Marxism.  The sad thing is-they don’t even know they’re doing it!  Of course, we know, because they said what they were going to do, and it’s being done!  Once something has been taught and absorbed by so many, it becomes “normal.”   And once it’s “normal” it is transmitted to every member of society.  

To serve its purpose of “negating” Western culture, the Frankfurt School developed a powerful tool it called “Critical Theory.” What was the theory? The theory was to criticize. By subjecting every traditional institution, starting with family, to endless, unremitting criticism (the Frankfurt School was careful never to define what it was for, only what it was against), it hoped to bring them down. Critical Theory is the basis for the “studies” departments that now inhabit American colleges and universities. Not surprisingly, those departments are the home turf of academic political correctness.

Studies in prejudice

The Frankfurt School sought to define traditional attitudes on every issue as “prejudice” in a series of academic studies that culminated in Adorno’s immensely influential book, “The Authoritarian Personality,” published in 1950. They invented a bogus “F-scale” that purported to tie traditional beliefs on sexual morals, relations between men and women and questions touching on the family to support for fascism. Today, the favorite term the politically correct use for anyone who disagrees with them is “fascist.”

 

This is one of the big lies of the left.  Anyone who believes in freedom is a “fascist.”  And to contrast,   anyone who believes in doing what the Marxists or Fascists actually did, are progressives!   This doesn’t actually present a way of thinking and doing that might be better, it’s about silencing and discrediting dissent.  If you can discredit a person, than you discredit their ideas.  The progressives have to avoid discussing ideas, especially when the ideas are superior to what they are trying to do.  So, by discrediting or smearing their opposition, they prevent their subjects from hearing facts and information that run contrary to the progressive narrative.  Just think of it as a large scale version of, “Ignore that man behind the curtain!”

 

The Frankfurt School again departed from orthodox Marxism, which argued that all of history was determined by who owned the means of production. Instead, they said history was determined by which groups, defined as men, women, races, religions, etc., had power or “dominance” over other groups. Certain groups, especially white males, were labeled “oppressors,” while other groups were defined as “victims.” Victims were automatically good, oppressors bad, just by what group they came from, regardless of individual behavior.

 

I remember having a discussion with a group of people that claimed that I have had some level of success in my life due to “white privilege.”  Now, this claim intends to do a few things:

 

  1. It attempts to negate the influence the actual effort and work.  This is a part of Western Culture.  I actually made a great effort to get educated, and then I worked hard at my career.  However, this is contrary to Marxism, so it must be discredited by claiming that anything I have came about because of my race.   More recently, it was part of the Barak Obama “You didn’t build that” speech. Frankly, like most authentic Americans, I don’t particularly appreciate my efforts being discredited.
  2. The ability to succeed gives hope to others.  To keep their victim classes on the “plantation,” the progressives must convince the “victims” that they are kept at a low level due to others having this “privilege.”   Victim classes can only be kept victims if they are thoroughly convinced that they cannot succeed.  What better way to do that than to convince them that successful people are only successful because of “special advantages?”  They also claim that any minorities that achieve success have “sold out.”  Remember Clarence Thomas’s confirmation?
  3. Many people are prompted to feel guilt when they are brought to the understanding of their “privilege.”  Don’t laugh!  I’ve literally heard people say this!  After all, if you are feeling guilty about having things because the culture is so totally in your favor, you might not feel very bad about giving up some things to make it all right, like, for example, your freedom?

 

In the end, I didn’t cave in to the Marxism, so I was accused of being a racist.  In typical progressive fashion, I had to be discredited.  Facts were irrelevant, and what I said had to be discounted.  The smear is the last defense of the progressives.

 

Though Marxists, the members of the Frankfurt School also drew from Nietzsche (someone else they admired for his defiance of traditional morals was the Marquis de Sade). They incorporated into their cultural Marxism what Nietzsche called the “transvaluation of all values.” What that means, in plain English, is that all the old sins become virtues, and all the old virtues become sins. Homosexuality is a fine and good thing, but anyone who thinks men and women should have different social roles is an evil “fascist.” That is what political correctness now teaches children in public schools all across America. (The Frankfurt School wrote about American public education. It said it did not matter if school children learned any skills or any facts. All that mattered was that they graduate from the schools with the right “attitudes” on certain questions.)

 

Well, it had to bring us to education eventually.  This is what we have been talking about for years now.  Scores are down, graduation rates are down, and illiteracy is up.  But this is acceptable, as most of the children reject God, and embrace Marxist teachings!

 

Marcuse also widened the Frankfurt School’s intellectual work. In the early 1930s, Horkheimer had left open the question of who would replace the working class as the agent of Marxist revolution. In the 1950s, Marcuse answered the question, saying it would be a coalition of students, blacks, feminist women and homosexuals – the core of the student rebellion of the 1960s, and the sacred “victims groups” of political correctness today. Marcuse further took one of political correctness’s favorite words, “tolerance,” and gave it a new meaning. He defined “liberating tolerance” as tolerance for all ideas and movements coming from the left, and intolerance for all ideas and movements coming from the right. When you hear the cultural Marxists today call for “tolerance,” they mean Marcuse’s “liberating tolerance” (just as when they call for “diversity,” they mean uniformity of belief in their ideology).

The student rebellion of the 1960s, driven largely by opposition to the draft for the Vietnam War, gave Marcuse a historic opportunity. As perhaps its most famous “guru,” he injected the Frankfurt School’s cultural Marxism into the baby boom generation. Of course, they did not understand what it really was. As was true from the Institute’s beginning, Marcuse and the few other people “in the know” did not advertise that political correctness and multi-culturalism were a form of Marxism. But the effect was devastating: a whole generation of Americans, especially the university-educated elite, absorbed cultural Marxism as their own, accepting a poisonous ideology that sought to destroy America’s traditional culture and Christian faith. That generation, which runs every elite institution in America, now wages a ceaseless war on all traditional beliefs and institutions. They have largely won that war. Most of America’s traditional culture lies in ruins.

 

So, when we are referred to as racists for questioning Obama’s policies, we know why.  When there is no outrage when Van Jones is an avowed Communist, we see through the ignorance.  When an untold number of protesters swarm Washington DC, and the MSM minimizes it, we see the cause.   When our children are indoctrinated, we see the purpose.

 

They infiltrated the institutions, just as they said they would.  They have since trained/indoctrinated generations of people.  Think for a moment… why are so many in the MSM are ignoring Obama’s lies, ObamaCare and jobs, Benghazi, the IRS scandal, Fast and Furious, and a host of other authentic news stories?  They were indoctrinated!  They went to the universities!  The Cultural Marxists occupied them first! Why are so many public school teachers towing the line?  Why are some even supporting pedophiles?  Come to think of it, why are so many engaging in pedophilia? Same thing!  They went to the universities!  They have absorbed the cultural rot! The list is virtually endless.  They have turned education into a leftist indoctrination machine, allowing them to then infiltrate every other institution in our nation.

 

This ties together with other topics that we have discussed.  For example, the Alinsky Method seems to be nothing more than a playbook for Critical Theory and tolerant repression.  It is a method to achieve the end.  The media’s ignorance and lies serve as well.  All of the indoctrinated institutions seem to act in the same way to work towards the goals, and circles the wagons for defense.

 

Where does this leave us?  We are in a precarious situation.  Our institutions are in the possession of people that would tear down and utterly destroy our republic.  The vast majority of them have no clue that they are working towards Marxist goals.  That is the evil brilliance of cultural Marxism.  The minions work towards the end goal, one of which they unaware.  They are programmed drones that have no idea that they are following the dictates of long dead Marxists.  None the less, they are doing their job, and doing it well.  But, we are aware, and that is a start.

As for #FreeKate, they will eventually implode.  I have a feeling this story will blow wide open, and soon.  But, we have to recognize that their responses have been very predictable.  They have been “programmed,” as our friend Bezmenov pointed out, “…to respond to certain stimuli.”   The Cultural Marxists, through the advocacy of permissive parenting, promoting sexuality at ever earlier ages, and promoting homosexuality, have destroyed our collective sense of morality.  The Cultural Marxists, in their promotion of victim groups, have created whole classes of people who, rather than deal with their own problems, blame them on others, and demand that the laws be changed to suit their own selfish, and often perverse needs.

Our fellow citizens on the Feminist, homosexual, and pedophile left do not realize that they are instrumental in destabilizing our culture, and bringing it to a point at which it becomes unmanageable.  They are programmed to do just that by destroying the institutions that have allowed us to resist Marxism.   Ironically, if they actually win, they really lose.  To their great, and perhaps final displeasure, they will find that once Marxism rules, their destabilizing influences will no longer be needed.  And, as Bezmenov points out…

…they think they will come to power.  Nothing can be further from the truth…  They will be lined up against the wall and shot.” 

 

It’s actually saddening that so many Americans are being used to accomplish the goals of a discredited and deadly ideology.  So many have been corrupted to a point of complete filth that they will never see the truth-until it is too late.  And, they are completely unaware that they are tools in a large game.  #FreeKate is a small part of that overall scheme, and they fail to realize it, nor will they ever. 

Linked by NeoSexist- Thanks!

Share

A Tale of Two Stories: #FreeKate and the Case of Convicted Sex Offender Neal Erickson

Share

You can really consider this an update on both stories, because I covered the situation with Neal Erickson a few weeks ago.  Here is the what is going on there…

Yes, you read that right.  A teacher has admitted to having repeated sexual contacts with a 14 year-old student, and there are a number of fellow teachers, as well as a school board member that have  come forward to defend him.  The Daily Caller has the disturbing details… 

Residents in a speck of a rural farm town in northern Michigan want to recall a school board member and fire several teachers who showed support for a local middle school teacher convicted of having sexual relations with an eighth-grade student.

The teacher, Neal Erickson, had been a science and computer-education teacher at Rose City Middle School. He was convicted of having sex with an eighth-grade student on multiple occasions, reports The Detroit News.

There were about 10 encounters. They involved oral sex, reports WSMH FOX 66. They occurred at the teacher’s house.

Erickson pleaded guilty to a single count of criminal sexual conduct. He was sentenced in July to 15 to 30 years in prison, reports the Ogemaw County Herald.

Prior to his sentencing, six current teachers and two retired ones penned letters to the presiding judge seeking leniency for their child-molesting colleague. The group — along with board member Michael Eagan — also sat with Erickson’s relatives during his sentencing hearing.

OK, let’s imagine for a moment that someone you know was revealed to be a child molester.  Not just one event, but  ten! Again, take a second to think about it, this guy did something he knew he shouldn’t have done, and then did it again-at least NINE more times!  That isn’t a mistake; it’s a pattern.  Now, given all of that, would you want anything to do with them?  Would you condemn them for their actions uncategorically?  And, what would you reasonably think of the people that are defending him?

So, that was the state of affairs at the time.  It has gotten even more interesting since…

The family of the victim has demanded that the teachers who supported criminal pervert Neal Erickson be fired, and have begun a petition drive to recall school board members who supported the criminal pervert. And guess what happened next?

A garage fire at John and Lori Janczewski’s house on Grandjean Road near Rose City destroyed the couple’s garage and melted the siding on their home early Saturday morning.
Lt. Melvin Matthews, post commander for the Michigan State Police Post in West Branch, said the fire is being ruled as arson. He said evidence gathered at the scene is being analyzed by the MSP crime lab, and new leads gathered since the incident occurred are being investigated.
The Janczewskis believe it was someone responding to their outspokenness against several West Branch-Rose City teachers and a board member, who they said publicly supported Neal Erickson, a former WB-RC teacher who recently pleaded guilty to first-degree criminal sexual conduct against the Janczewski’s son. . . .
John Janczewski said he doesn’t understand why someone would do something like this to his family.
“We don’t deserve this,” he said in tears. “We’re not a bad family. We’ve done nothing but stand up for our son, the victim. They could have killed my whole family. Whoever’s done this has no remorse. They have no soul.”
John Janczewski said he and his wife do not plan to stop. They are currently circulating petitions for the recall of WB-RC board member Mike Eagan.
“Whoever’s done this, we’re not going to quit,” he said. “We’re not giving up. We’re going to continue to fight, until the end.”

School teachers who are insane enough to support a criminal pervert are insane enough to commit any crime themselves.

I guess the translation is something like this…

Don’t speak out about child sex offenders, and those that support them, or bad things will happen to you. 

Now, back to #FreeKate, where we see that the victims parent’s in this situation are under threat as well-by people that want to make it legal for adults to have sex with minors…

Here are some examples…

So, as you can see.  Documented facts are really libelous.  However, let’s see what team #FreeKate thinks is not libelous…

James and Laurie Smith wouldn’t give up. They were out to destroy my daughter, they feel like my daughter “made” their daughter gay. They are bigoted, religious [zealots] that see being gay as a sin and wrong, and they blame my daughter. Of course I see it 100% different. I don’t see or label these girls as gay. They are teenagers in high school experimenting with their sexuality, all teens do it in one form or another. They are teens, its healthy and normal. And even if their daughter is gay, who cares, she is still their daughter.

Unfortunately by the letter of the law, this girl has NO voice. Her parents can play the “victims” and ruin my daughters life. We have written letters through our attorneys trying to appeal to these people as parents, talk through it and come to some agreement or understanding but James and Laurie Smith refuse. These people’s delusional stand, their hate and bigotry is tearing our daughter apart.


As you can see, there is a lot of “tolerance” out there from the pro-sexual abuse crowd. That’s really just a small sampling. But, there is even some more, from Kaitlyn Hunt’s lawyer!

lt looks as though we have an alleged victim who doesn’t agree with how things are being handled by the State, her parents or their attorney. She has felt compelled to do what she thought was the only thing to save Kaitlyn from the State and her parents and that was to reach out and let Kaitlyn know this was not her idea or what she wants. I am totally cognizant that she is a minor.

Nonetheless it comes down to we still have a situation of two teenagers who were in school together and involved in a consensual relationship. Yes one that under the current law is a crime, but still consensual. It was brought to an abrupt end and the older “adult” teen faces up to thirty years in prison. The younger teen cannot comprehend the seriousness of the matter because it was something she consented to. Her opinion is ignored by the State, interrogated by the Sheriff’s Department, taken to a church that labels being gay a sin, has the Bible thrown at her, all of her things in her room boxed up and taken from her, is apparently hit by her parents, and clearly yelled at for lying by her father in the presence of Detective Shepherd at the school in a subsequent interview. How could she not be confused, scared and feel as though this is all her fault and no one is listening? She already tried to speak to Kaitlyn’s mother, Kelley, who shut her down. So she turns to the only person who could possible understand in her eyes and a person she clearly does not want to see hurt and that is Kaitlyn. She wants to try to save her and in doing so she just causes the walls to continue to tumble down.

All of this is to attack the victim in this case.  She was manipulated terribly by Kaitlyn Hunt.  And this is where there is another parallel between out two stories.  Let’s go back and see how Neal Erickson’s victim, also 14 at the time, reacted…

The parents of the victim in this case were outraged to see Erickson’s fellow teachers supporting this confessed criminal pervert, whose molestation of their son caused horrible problems:

The victim’s mother also spoke prior to sentencing, telling Erickson he violated her son and caused a rift in the family. She said the family appeared happy on the outside, but on the inside, the home was a “battle zone.”
“We couldn’t figure out why (the victim) hated us,” she said. “He went after his father. There were physical fights.” . . .
“You were his teacher,” she said. “You were his mentor. You were his friend. And you violated him.”
She added the victim kept the sexual encounters a secret and suffered because of it.
“He kept all of this a secret, and he went through emotional pains,” she said.

SJ Reidhead, a blogger who is also an abuse survivor, shared her insights in a very powerful post…

This is what Kate Hunt’s victim is looking forward to, for the next 30 or 40 years of her life.  She’s been separated from her parents, now probably doesn’t even trust them.  She won’t trust her old friends.  Friends at church will not be part of her life.

I know someone who dated a guy who was abusive.  His family thought they were above the law, so to speak.  His mother did everything she could to separate this person from her mother.  The damage has taken over thirty years to be repaired.  Their relationship has never been the same.  This is what the victim’s mother has to look forward to, if she is lucky.

Kate Hunt’s victim is at an extremely vulnerable age.  Being 14 and 15 is traumatizing enough, without being a young lesbian, and without being the victim of a psychopathic, narcissistic predator and her extremely vicious parents.  Dealing with life at her age is not easy.  You either hate or love yourself, both at the same time, almost bi-polar as normal.  You are up and you are down, all in the same minute.  When you sit, you hold a pillow in front of your body.  That’s normal.

The victim has been manipulated into thinking that Kate is probably the love of her life.  Her morals have been destroyed.  Her innocence is shattered.  Unless her parents take her far away from Florida, she’s never going to get a break.  The Hunts of this world are far too nasty and far too invasive.  If you  what Steve Hunt is doing to those who are writing about the story is bad, just wait until they continue to harass an innocent life and her family.

This is what the victim and her family are facing, and just like SJ Reidhead described, the Hunts and their supporters are heaping even more damage upon the victim, while calling it “love.”  The Hunts and their supporters claim that indecision or conflicted feelings on the part of the now 15 year-old  victim are a sign that Kaitlyn really shouldn’t be guilty, because they are “in love.”  Instead, these feelings are symptoms of the  very abuse that Kaitlyn Hunt inflicted on her young victim.  Add to that the media campaign to attack the victim and her parents, and you can see why the younger girl might be suffering trauma.  And, in their effort to save their “special snowflake” from the consequences of her actions, the Hunts are dead set on inflicting even more trauma.  It’s scorched Earth, and they could care less about what happens to their victims.

Share

Teachers, School Board Members Under Fire for Supporting Child Molesting Collegue

Share

Yes, you read that right.  A teacher has admitted to having repeated sexual contacts with a 14 year-old student, and there are a number of fellow teachers, as well as a school board member that have  come forward to defend him.  The Daily Caller has the disturbing details… 

Residents in a speck of a rural farm town in northern Michigan want to recall a school board member and fire several teachers who showed support for a local middle school teacher convicted of having sexual relations with an eighth-grade student.

The teacher, Neal Erickson, had been a science and computer-education teacher at Rose City Middle School. He was convicted of having sex with an eighth-grade student on multiple occasions, reports The Detroit News.

There were about 10 encounters. They involved oral sex, reports WSMH FOX 66. They occurred at the teacher’s house.

Erickson pleaded guilty to a single count of criminal sexual conduct. He was sentenced in July to 15 to 30 years in prison, reports the Ogemaw County Herald.

Prior to his sentencing, six current teachers and two retired ones penned letters to the presiding judge seeking leniency for their child-molesting colleague. The group — along with board member Michael Eagan — also sat with Erickson’s relatives during his sentencing hearing.

OK, let’s imagine for a moment that someone you know was revealed to be a child molester.  Not just one event, but  ten! Again, take a second to think about it, this guy did something he knew he shouldn’t have done, and then did it again-at least NINE more times!  That isn’t a mistake; it’s a pattern.  Now, given all of that, would you want anything to do with them?  Would you condemn them for their actions uncategorically?  And, what would you reasonably think of the people that are defending him?

Once again, we are seeing the results of the Long March Through the Institutions.  We have seen all sorts of previously condemned behavior now being endorsed.  We are also seeing the effort to normalize sex with children.  If you recall, the #FreeKate crowd thinks that adults having sex with children is perfectly OK.  In this case, we see that making it less serious is in play-a necessary step towards normalizing it.

After this, it seems that Manhattan Infidel is more into prophesy than parody. 

Share

25 Year Old Teacher, Nikki Scherwitz, Arrested for Having Sex With a 16 Year-old Student

Share

What is with it with 20-something teachers having sex with high school students?  The latest is Nikki Scherwitz, a 25 year old teacher, that came to a post prom party drunk, and had sex with  a 16 year-old student.  Dan Riehl has more…

Go figure.

Nikki Scherwitz, who taught 10th Grade English at Brazosport High School, Houston, was charged with sexual assault of a child and improper relationship with a student. The boy is believed to have been in her class. She had only worked at the school for nine months. Freeport police said the sexual relationship had been going on for weeks.

nikki

via Nikki Scherwitz: Married teacher and mother – Mail Online.

OK then, I have a theory.  In a normal, functioning adult, there is a general urge to want to be with people of your own level of maturity, or sometimes more mature.  But, these women gravitate to those that should be less mature.  Note that I said “should be less mature?”  I’m hinting at that these women are on the same emotional/maturational level as the students they are teaching.  The real question is why is this happening in such large numbers? Are they paedophiles that are taking teaching jobs to  have access to children, or did they stop developing emotionally, and just fall into their own level.  It’s an curious problem, but is anyone compiling data on all of these teachers?

Share

Voice of Elmo, Kevin Clash, Steps Down After Second Underage Sex Accuser Emerges

Share

We recently had covered that Kevin Clash, “the voice of Elmo,” was accused of having a sexual relationship with a teen.  Apparently, that wasn’t enough to prompt a reaction reaction from the makers of Sesame Street.  However, the second accuser seemed to make an impact…

And what’s that? You say Elmo likes boys just a little bit too much?

Kevin Clash — known as the voice of Elmo — is facing NEW allegations that he had a sexual relationship with a SECOND underage boy …
The accuser — who is now in his 30s — has filed a lawsuit against Clash … claiming the two met on a gay phone chat line … when the accuser was 15 years old and Clash was 32. . . .
Among the allegations, [Cecil] Singleton claims, “[Clash] trolled gay telephone chat line rooms to meet and have sex with underage boys.”
In the lawsuit, filed in federal court in NYC, Singleton claims Clash “groomed [the accuser] to gain his trust by, among other things, taking him to nice dinners and giving him money.”
Singleton claims while Clash was featured on “Sesame Street,” he was “preying on teenage boys to satisfy his depraved sexual interests.”

That’s so sad. And now Elmo’s going bye-bye.

Seriously, why isn’t this a major news story.  I mean, Sesame Street is featured on the publicly funded PBS, and the iconic red muppet (now an alleged pedophile) makes enough money in merchandising to fund PBS many times over, it seems to me that there might be some coverage of this sad affair?

I guess it’s that Elmo isn’t a Republican.

Share

FBI Uncovers Consensual Relationship Between Adults

Share

Consensual relationships are our “thang.”

The Federal Bureau of Investigation, long known by its nickname “The Privacy Penetraters” has set the world of Washington DC afire with the discovery of the affair between CIA director David Petraeus and his biographer Paula Broadwell.

Speaking from Washington, FBI director Robert  Mueller told reporters that

The FBI prides itself on uncovering and destroying two things:  Organized crime and consensual relationships between adults.  But mainly consensual relationships between adults.  Oh hell who am I kidding.  We don’t touch organized crime.  Those guys are dangerous.  We are all civil servants making a civil servant’s salary.  Who wants to get killed over that?  So now we mainly monitor emails hoping to find sex stuff.

As is the FBI’s want, they were  monitoring CIA emails hoping to find evidence of sex.  That’s when they first uncovered the emails from Broadwell and the reference to “sex under a desk.

“At first we were confused as to the meaning” said Mueller.

Sex under a desk?  That’s a drink I have a happy hour.  In fact I asked one of the younger men here in the office if he’d like to have sex under a desk with me sometime and he kissed me and told me that I have given him the courage to come out of the closet. I mean, WTF?

Confused as to its meaning, The FBI brought in as a consultant an expert in the field:  former President Bill Clinton.

After reading the emails and the reference to “sex under a desk” Clinton immediately booked a flight to North Carolina, where Broadwell resides.

“He was out the door pretty fast” said Mueller.  “All he had was a plane ticket, flowers, condoms and a box of cigars.  We never heard from him again.”

Without Clinton’s help the FBI struggled to ascertain whether the phrase “sex under a desk” was in fact sex-related.  The Bureau finally decided it was sex-related after intercepting the following text exchange:

Petraeus:  I enjoyed having sex under a desk with you.

Broadwell:  I never knew sex under a desk could be so fun.

Petraeus:  We should do this every happy hour.

Bill Clinton:  Can I get in on the action?  I love sex under a desk and promise not to come in your mouth.

Petraeus:  What the hell? What’s he talking about?

Broadwell:   Excuse me this is a private conversation!

Clinton:  I got cigars!

The FBI then confronted Betraeus who was then forced to tender his resignation to President Obama.

“We’re still not 100 percent sure ’sex under a desk’ in fact refers to sexual relations” said Mueller.  “But I’ve learned to stop asking men in the office if they want to have sex under a desk with me.”

In a related note a message on the FBI’s website has asked Americans to “send us all their sex-related emails.  Please.  We’re very lonely.”

Bill Clinton could not be contacted in regard to this story.

Original Post:  Manhattan Infidel

Share

This is What Planned Parenthood Teaches Children: UPDATED The Video has been fixed

Share

The following video features “educational” materials that are given to children.  As such, they are completely innapropriate for children.

THIS IS NOT A CHILD-FRIENDLY POST!

Consider yourself warned.

The video is correct.  This is not education- it is marketing.  And from the content, you can clearly see what is being sold.

From a historical context, this is all part of the culture war that has been waging for decades.  Regular readers here will remember my discussion of Cultural Marxism.  The story of that movement starts with the pre-WWI prediction that the Western nations would fall to Communism.  That did not happen, so the Communists were left scratching their heads as to why.  For more, here is an excerpt from The American Thinker…

By the end of WWI, socialists realized that something was amiss, for the world’s proletariat had not heeded Marx’s call to rise up in opposition to evil capitalism and to embrace communism instead.  They wondered what had gone wrong.

Separately, two Marxist theorists-Antonio Gramsci of Italy and Georg Lukacs of Hungary-concluded that the Christianized West was the obstacle standing in the way of a communist new world order.  The West would have to be conquered first.

Gramsci posited that because Christianity had been dominant in the West for over 2000 years, not only was it fused with Western civilization, but it had corrupted the workers class.  The West would have to be de-Christianized, said Gramsci, by means of a “long march through the culture.”  Additionally, a new proletariat must be created.  In his “Prison Notebooks,” he suggested that the new proletariat be comprised of many criminals, women, and racial minorities.

The new battleground, reasoned Gramsci, must become the culture, starting with the traditional family and completely engulfing churches, schools, media, entertainment, civic organizations, literature, science, and history.  All of these things must be radically transformed and the social and cultural order gradually turned upside-down with the new proletariat placed in power at the top.

One of the chief subjects for attack was Christianity, and the Communists found an effective weapon against God…sex education.

In 1919, Georg Lukacs became Deputy Commissar for Culture in the short-lived Bolshevik Bela Kun regime in Hungary.  He immediately set plans in motion to de-Christianize Hungary.  Reasoning that if Christian sexual ethics could be undermined among children, then both the hated patriarchal family and the Church would be dealt a crippling blow. Lukacs launched a radical sex education program in the schools.  Sex lectures were organized and literature handed out which graphically instructed youth in free love (promiscuity) and sexual intercourse while simultaneously encouraging them to deride and reject Christian moral ethics, monogamy, and parental and church authority.  All of this was accompanied by a reign of cultural terror perpetrated against parents, priests, and dissenters.

Hungary’s youth, having been fed a steady diet of values-neutral (atheism) and radical sex education while simultaneously encouraged to rebel against all authority, easily turned into delinquents ranging from bullies and petty thieves to sex predators, murderers, and sociopaths.

It seems pretty clear, doesn’t it?  Of course, the standard American leftist will not always understand that they are pawns in a war waged by long dead purveyors of an evil concept.  So they will miss the obvious political and historical evidence for their useful idiocy.   But for those of us that study such things, we are again confronted with people that had a stated intent, created a plan of action to achieve that intent, and then followed through with those plans. And now, we see the predictable results.
H/T: Hot Air
Share